Team:NYMU-Taipei/Modeling/ModSensors
From 2013.igem.org
(48 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{:Team:NYMU-Taipei/Header}} | {{:Team:NYMU-Taipei/Header}} | ||
+ | =Sensors= | ||
+ | ==Backgrounds== | ||
- | |||
- | + | When ''Nosema'' enters the bees, it will trigger bees’ ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species) production, which in turn launches E. coli’s OxyR production. After that ROS and OxyR will form a complex and binds to AhpCp promoter, which function as a sensor/ switch to have the whole circuit opened when ''Nosema'' exists, and closed when ''Nosema'' is killed.. | |
+ | To increase the sensitivity of this switch, we add an additional circuit expressing OxyR regulated by a constitutive promoter to enhance the basal OxyR expression in ''E. coli''. | ||
- | + | The picture shows how oxyR and ROS form a complex: | |
- | + | ||
- | == | + | [[Image:NYMU_ros oxyr complex.png|center]] |
+ | |||
+ | ==Objectives== | ||
#To know the lag time between sensing the invasion and the production of the killing protein. | #To know the lag time between sensing the invasion and the production of the killing protein. | ||
- | #The minimal | + | #The minimal Oxidative stress that can activate the switch by choosing the proper constitutive promoter for boosting OxyR's concentration |
- | #To know the relation between ROS input and the | + | #To know the relation between ROS input and the AhpCp promoter open strength. |
- | #To see to which degree will | + | #To see to which degree will AhpCp promoter influence the production of LuxI, LuxR, and TetR, which will influence the second and the third circuit. |
+ | |||
+ | ==System== | ||
- | It is assumed that the concentration of ROS in bees is relative to the severity of Nosema infection, and that | + | It is assumed that the concentration of ROS in bees is relative to the severity of ''Nosema'' infection, and that OxyR is so abundant that once ROS appears, it will soon bind to ROS to form OxyR* and reach equilibrium. |
'''Equation1:''' | '''Equation1:''' | ||
Line 21: | Line 26: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<div lang="latex" class="equation"> | <div lang="latex" class="equation"> | ||
- | \frac{d[ | + | \frac{d[mRNA_O_x_y_R]}{dt}=PoPSconstitutive\times\frac{N}{V}-KdegmRNA[mRNAOxyR] |
</div> | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Line 31: | Line 36: | ||
V = volume of a cell | V = volume of a cell | ||
- | '''The aim of the equation is to know the production rate of | + | '''The aim of the equation is to know the production rate of mRNAOxyR, and choose the proper constitutive promoter for boosting OxyR's concentration.''' |
+ | |||
+ | [[know more1]] | ||
'''Equation2:''' | '''Equation2:''' | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<div lang="latex" class="equation"> | <div lang="latex" class="equation"> | ||
- | \frac{d[ | + | \frac{d[OxyR]}{dt}=RBS\times[mRNAOxyR]-KdegOxyR[OxyR] |
</div> | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Line 42: | Line 49: | ||
RBS = binding site strength | RBS = binding site strength | ||
- | + | KdegOxyR = degrading constant of OxyR | |
- | '''The aim of the equation is to know the production rate of | + | '''The aim of the equation is to know the production rate of OxyR and when it can reach the concentration activating AhpCp promoter, which can in turn be deduced to get the lag time between sensing the invasion and the production of the killing protein.''' |
+ | |||
+ | [[know more2]] | ||
'''Equation3:''' | '''Equation3:''' | ||
Line 50: | Line 59: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<div lang="latex" class="equation"> | <div lang="latex" class="equation"> | ||
- | [ | + | [OxyR*]=KOxyR*\times[ROS]\times[OxyR] |
</div> | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
- | + | KOxyR* = constant rate of ROS+OxyR→OxyR* | |
- | '''The aim of the equation is to know the concentration of | + | '''The aim of the equation is to know the concentration of OxyR* given the concentration of ROS and OxyR, which will know the relation between ROS input and the AhpCp promoter open time.''' |
+ | [[know more3]] | ||
'''Equation4:''' | '''Equation4:''' | ||
- | <html> | + | <html> <div lang="latex" class="equation"> |
- | <div lang="latex" class="equation"> | + | \frac{d[mRNA_L_a_c_I]}{dt}=\frac{ [mRNALuxI] }{dt}=\frac{ [mRNALuxR] }{dt} |
- | + | =\frac{ {[OxyR*]} ^{{n}^{OxyR*}}}{{{KdOxyR*}^{{n}^{OxyR*}}}+{[OxyR*]}^{{n}^{OxyR*}}}\times{PoPsAhpCp}\times\frac{N}{V} | |
- | </div> | + | </div> </html> |
- | </html> | + | |
PoPSconstitutive = promoter strength of constitutive promoter | PoPSconstitutive = promoter strength of constitutive promoter | ||
Line 73: | Line 82: | ||
V = volume of a cell | V = volume of a cell | ||
- | The aim of the equation is to know how | + | The aim of the equation is to know how AhpCp promoter strength (in PoPS) influences the production of TetR, LuxI, and LuxR. |
- | + | [[know more4]] | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ==Results== | |
- | + | This picture predicts the buildup of concentration of mRNAOxyR, mRNACI, OxyR, CI will reach in a newborn Bee. coli (without ''Nosema'' invasion). | |
- | + | [[Image:NYMU_oxyR normal.png|center]] | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | Since naturally produced oxyR in Bee.coli (our E.coli) is not sufficient, we add a constitutive promoter before the oxyR-producing gene to increase oxyR concentration to reach the effective level (0.005M). The picture shows that after adding constitutive promoter, oxyR concentration can reach the effective level to activate ROS/oxyR complex-induced promoter 50 hours after ''Nosema'' infection. | |
- | + | ==Discussion== | |
- | + | The results shown in killing protein and ethanol production means that the adjusted OxyR concentration is high enough to swiftly form a complex after ROS is heighten, therefore turning on the switch. | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | In reality, the final centration of OxyR can reach much more higher than we had expected after a longer period of time. The inaccuracy will be discussed below. | |
- | + | The reason why the actual result of OxyR concentration differing from the expected one may be that we did not take the negative feedback of OxyR production. | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | This picture shows OxyR cycle in E. coli: | |
- | + | [[Image:NYMU_SS.png|center]] | |
- | + | The top molecule is reduced form of OxyR, whose Cys199 to sulfoxide will be oxidized by hydrogen peroxide (the oxidative reagent as well as a kind of ROS). | |
+ | |||
+ | After the water exclusion and disulfide bond formation, the reduced form of oxy turns into the oxidized one. Oxidized OxyR is an activator of target promoter, which stimulates downstream gene expression. | ||
+ | However, Oxidized form of OxyR protein is transformed into reduced OxyR protein (inactivated) by thioredoxin reductase (GSH). Reduced OxyR protein (the top molecule)provides the autorepression of OxyR gene (a negative feedback). | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Parameters== | ||
+ | {|class="wikitable" !Model!!Parameter!!Description!!Value!!Unit!!Reference | ||
+ | ! style="text-align: center;"|Model | ||
+ | ! style="text-align: center;"|Parameter | ||
+ | ! style="text-align: center;"|Description | ||
+ | ! style="text-align: center;"|Value | ||
+ | ! style="text-align: center;"|Unit | ||
+ | ! style="text-align: center;"|Reference | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |rowspan=5 style="text-align: center;"|'''Sensor''' | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center;"|KdegOxyR | ||
+ | |OxyR degrading rate | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center;"|10<sup>7</sup> | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center;"|M<sup>-1</sup> x min<sup>-1</sup> | ||
+ | |rowspan=3|Regulation of the OxyR transcription factor by hydrogen peroxide and the cellular thiol—disulfide status | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center;"|KdOxyR* | ||
+ | |Dissociation constant of OxyR* | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center;"|10<sup>-7.33</sup> | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center;"|M | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center;"|KOxyR | ||
+ | |OxyR producing rate constant | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center;"|5.012 x 10<sup>14</sup> | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center;"|X | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center;"|nOxyR* | ||
+ | |Hill coefficient of OxyR* | ||
+ | |Ranging from 0.75~3.5,depends on what kind of ROS it react with | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center;"|X | ||
+ | |OxyR: A Molecular Code for Redox-Related Signaling | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center;"|N | ||
+ | |Copy number | ||
+ | |887(cells containing 25% plasmid bearing cells) | ||
+ | |Single piece | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | #Escherichia coli Plasmid Copy Number Assay | ||
+ | #Improved determination of plasmid copy number using quantitative real-time PCR for monitoring fermentation processes | ||
+ | |} | ||
- | |||
{{:Team:NYMU-Taipei/Footer}} | {{:Team:NYMU-Taipei/Footer}} |
Latest revision as of 02:23, 29 October 2013
Contents |
Sensors
Backgrounds
When Nosema enters the bees, it will trigger bees’ ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species) production, which in turn launches E. coli’s OxyR production. After that ROS and OxyR will form a complex and binds to AhpCp promoter, which function as a sensor/ switch to have the whole circuit opened when Nosema exists, and closed when Nosema is killed.. To increase the sensitivity of this switch, we add an additional circuit expressing OxyR regulated by a constitutive promoter to enhance the basal OxyR expression in E. coli.
The picture shows how oxyR and ROS form a complex:
Objectives
- To know the lag time between sensing the invasion and the production of the killing protein.
- The minimal Oxidative stress that can activate the switch by choosing the proper constitutive promoter for boosting OxyR's concentration
- To know the relation between ROS input and the AhpCp promoter open strength.
- To see to which degree will AhpCp promoter influence the production of LuxI, LuxR, and TetR, which will influence the second and the third circuit.
System
It is assumed that the concentration of ROS in bees is relative to the severity of Nosema infection, and that OxyR is so abundant that once ROS appears, it will soon bind to ROS to form OxyR* and reach equilibrium.
Equation1:
PoPSconstitutive = promoter strength of constitutive promoter (J23102)
N = number of plasmid in a single cell
V = volume of a cell
The aim of the equation is to know the production rate of mRNAOxyR, and choose the proper constitutive promoter for boosting OxyR's concentration.
Equation2:
RBS = binding site strength
KdegOxyR = degrading constant of OxyR
The aim of the equation is to know the production rate of OxyR and when it can reach the concentration activating AhpCp promoter, which can in turn be deduced to get the lag time between sensing the invasion and the production of the killing protein.
Equation3:
KOxyR* = constant rate of ROS+OxyR→OxyR*
The aim of the equation is to know the concentration of OxyR* given the concentration of ROS and OxyR, which will know the relation between ROS input and the AhpCp promoter open time.
Equation4:
PoPSconstitutive = promoter strength of constitutive promoter
N = number of plasmid in a single cell
V = volume of a cell
The aim of the equation is to know how AhpCp promoter strength (in PoPS) influences the production of TetR, LuxI, and LuxR.
Results
This picture predicts the buildup of concentration of mRNAOxyR, mRNACI, OxyR, CI will reach in a newborn Bee. coli (without Nosema invasion).
Since naturally produced oxyR in Bee.coli (our E.coli) is not sufficient, we add a constitutive promoter before the oxyR-producing gene to increase oxyR concentration to reach the effective level (0.005M). The picture shows that after adding constitutive promoter, oxyR concentration can reach the effective level to activate ROS/oxyR complex-induced promoter 50 hours after Nosema infection.
Discussion
The results shown in killing protein and ethanol production means that the adjusted OxyR concentration is high enough to swiftly form a complex after ROS is heighten, therefore turning on the switch.
In reality, the final centration of OxyR can reach much more higher than we had expected after a longer period of time. The inaccuracy will be discussed below.
The reason why the actual result of OxyR concentration differing from the expected one may be that we did not take the negative feedback of OxyR production.
This picture shows OxyR cycle in E. coli:
The top molecule is reduced form of OxyR, whose Cys199 to sulfoxide will be oxidized by hydrogen peroxide (the oxidative reagent as well as a kind of ROS).
After the water exclusion and disulfide bond formation, the reduced form of oxy turns into the oxidized one. Oxidized OxyR is an activator of target promoter, which stimulates downstream gene expression. However, Oxidized form of OxyR protein is transformed into reduced OxyR protein (inactivated) by thioredoxin reductase (GSH). Reduced OxyR protein (the top molecule)provides the autorepression of OxyR gene (a negative feedback).
Parameters
Model | Parameter | Description | Value | Unit | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensor | KdegOxyR | OxyR degrading rate | 107 | M-1 x min-1 | Regulation of the OxyR transcription factor by hydrogen peroxide and the cellular thiol—disulfide status |
KdOxyR* | Dissociation constant of OxyR* | 10-7.33 | M | ||
KOxyR | OxyR producing rate constant | 5.012 x 1014 | X | ||
nOxyR* | Hill coefficient of OxyR* | Ranging from 0.75~3.5,depends on what kind of ROS it react with | X | OxyR: A Molecular Code for Redox-Related Signaling | |
N | Copy number | 887(cells containing 25% plasmid bearing cells) | Single piece |
|