Team:Evry/Modeltr2

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(5 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
</p>
</p>
-
<h2>Goals</h2>
+
<h2>Goal</h2>
<p>
<p>
This model was made to check if our first strategy was viable. It aims to answer the following question: <br/>
This model was made to check if our first strategy was viable. It aims to answer the following question: <br/>
Line 53: Line 53:
<br/>
<br/>
-
<h2>Parameters:</h2>
 
-
The simulations was made with following parameters:<br/><br/>
 
<table border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;">
<table border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;">
<tr>
<tr>
Line 99: Line 97:
<td><b>δ</b></td>
<td><b>δ</b></td>
<td>mol<sup>-1</sup></td>
<td>mol<sup>-1</sup></td>
-
<td>Dimensional parameter</td>
+
<td>Chelation rate</td>
</tr>
</tr>
</table>
</table>
-
 
+
<br/><br/>
The graph on the right explains the reasoning: for instance, the arrow with a + between N and P means that the variation of P has a positive linear term in N.
The graph on the right explains the reasoning: for instance, the arrow with a + between N and P means that the variation of P has a positive linear term in N.
</p>
</p>
Line 215: Line 213:
<td>2.65*10<sup>-8</sup></td>
<td>2.65*10<sup>-8</sup></td>
<td>mol<sup>-1</sup></td>
<td>mol<sup>-1</sup></td>
-
<td>Dimensional parameter</td>
+
<td>Chelation rate</td>
<td><a href="#Ref">[4]</a></td>
<td><a href="#Ref">[4]</a></td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 230: Line 228:
<h2>Models and scripts</h2>
<h2>Models and scripts</h2>
<p>
<p>
-
This model was made using the Python language. You can <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/2e/Duodenum.zip"> download the python script here</a>.
+
This model was made using the Python language. You can <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/a/ae/Duodenummodel.zip"> download the python script here</a>.
</p>
</p>
Line 239: Line 237:
<li>Physiol Rev 93: 1721–1741, 2013 doi:10.1152/physrev.00008.2013 - Tomas Ganz "SYSTEMIC IRON HOMEOSTASIS"</li>
<li>Physiol Rev 93: 1721–1741, 2013 doi:10.1152/physrev.00008.2013 - Tomas Ganz "SYSTEMIC IRON HOMEOSTASIS"</li>
   <li>Calculated from : Computational Modeling and Simulation of the Human Duodenum - B. Hari, S. Bakalis, P. Fryer - 2012</li>
   <li>Calculated from : Computational Modeling and Simulation of the Human Duodenum - B. Hari, S. Bakalis, P. Fryer - 2012</li>
-
 
+
  <li>Wikipedia</li>
   <li>Calculated from : Bacterial iron homeostasis - Simon C. Andrews, Andrea K. Robinson, Francisco Rodriguez-Quinones</li>
   <li>Calculated from : Bacterial iron homeostasis - Simon C. Andrews, Andrea K. Robinson, Francisco Rodriguez-Quinones</li>
-
  <li>Wikipedia</li>
 
  </ol>
  </ol>
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 03:36, 29 October 2013

Iron coli project

Final flush treatment model

Introduction

This model comes right after the Disease model. We now want to model the flush treatment by simulating a flush of iron-chelating bacteria.

Observations

Once our genetically modified bacteria are released in the duodenum lumen, they produce siderophores to chelate the solved iron, thus making it unavailable for intestinal absorption. Then, they eventually flush out of the duodenum. The main hypothesis in this model is that the bacteria do not colonize the duodenum : they only flow through. They do not even have time to grow, for the time required to flush through is close to 40 seconds.
Because some of the parameters remain unknown, it is a theoretical simulation which will not give any numerical results, only qualitative results.

Goal

This model was made to check if our first strategy was viable. It aims to answer the following question:
"Is it possible to chelate a significant amount of iron with a flush strategy?"

Assumptions

The same assumptions as in the previous model apply:

  • Our bacteria don't settle in the duodenum
  • No regulation in the patient's iron absorption
  • Constant iron flow in the duodenum lumen
  • Homogeneous fluid
  • The bacterial quantity is constant
  • The bacterial natural absorption is insignificant compared to the chelation
  • The patient ingests 20mg of iron per day (Guideline Daily Amounts)

Materials and methods

A : Total quantity of iron absorbed by the duodenum (mol)
S : Quantity of solved iron (mol)
P : Total quantity of enterobactin produced by our population of bacteria (mol)
Q : Total quantity of chelated iron (mol)
N : Number of bacteria



Sp mol.s-1 Iron pulse
v m.s-1 Chyme's flow average speed
L m Duodenum length
α s-1 Duodenum absorption rate
K mol/s Activator Magnitude
p mol.s-1 Value at zero of the activator
h - Activator efficiency
d mol Activator threshold
δ mol-1 Chelation rate


The graph on the right explains the reasoning: for instance, the arrow with a + between N and P means that the variation of P has a positive linear term in N.

Where is our Logistic function (which we will here abusively call activator).

Results

Absorption
Figure 1 : Iron Absorption in the duodenum with and without treatment.

The Figure 1 represents the total iron absorbed by the duodenum during an average meal (with and without bacterial treatment), whereas the Figure 2 represents the instant ambient iron in the duodenum lumen(with and without bacterial treatment).


Quantity
Figure 2 : Iron in the duodenum during the simulation. The grey strip represent the presence of the bacteria in the duodenum.

The Figure 2 points out the influence of our bacteria on the middle. The blue curve decreases significantly under the bacterial flow. That underlines the fact that the treatment doesn't directly affect the absorption. After 150 seconds, the chyme is considered to progressively leave the duodenum (entering the jejunum), thus reducing the iron absorption in both cases, which finally leads to a steady state.



Parameters:

The simulations was made with following parameters:

Name Value Unit Description Reference
Sp 4.5*10-9 mol.s-1 Iron pulse [1][2]
v 0.007 m.s-1 Chyme's flow average speed [2]
L 0.3 m Duodenum length [3]
α 0.03 s-1 Duodenum absorption rate Disease model
K 100 mol/s Activator Magnitude set
p 0.005 mol.s-1 Value at zero of the activator set
h 10-5 - Activator efficiency set
d 10-9 mol Activator threshold [4]
δ 2.65*10-8 mol-1 Chelation rate [4]


Conclusion

The combination of the two curves clearly shows that bacteria would be able to neutralize a significant quantity of iron before it is absorbed by the duodenum.
It would thus be possible to approximately divide the intestinal iron intake by 2 if the patient takes one pill during each meal. This means that the patient would endure a lighter treatment : less bloodletting for people suffering from hemochromatosis, and less iron chelator's side effects for the thalassemia.

Models and scripts

This model was made using the Python language. You can download the python script here.

References:

  1. Physiol Rev 93: 1721–1741, 2013 doi:10.1152/physrev.00008.2013 - Tomas Ganz "SYSTEMIC IRON HOMEOSTASIS"
  2. Calculated from : Computational Modeling and Simulation of the Human Duodenum - B. Hari, S. Bakalis, P. Fryer - 2012
  3. Wikipedia
  4. Calculated from : Bacterial iron homeostasis - Simon C. Andrews, Andrea K. Robinson, Francisco Rodriguez-Quinones