Team:USTC CHINA/Project/ProjectDetails/Design
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(3 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
<p>To be more user-friendly, 4# contains a reporting system. After melting in water, the spores will germinate and express blue pigment protein (amilCP) to report the best using time. Meanwhile, 4# could also ensure biosafety, as 4# engineering bacteria can kill all the engineered bacteria after use.</p> | <p>To be more user-friendly, 4# contains a reporting system. After melting in water, the spores will germinate and express blue pigment protein (amilCP) to report the best using time. Meanwhile, 4# could also ensure biosafety, as 4# engineering bacteria can kill all the engineered bacteria after use.</p> | ||
<h3>4.1 Reporter</h3> | <h3>4.1 Reporter</h3> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/cb/2013ustc-china_genecircuit2.png" width="580" height=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/cb/2013ustc-china_genecircuit2.png" width="580" height="160"/> |
<p>T-vaccine is also a user-friendly product. Our potential users are not medical professionals, they activate T-vaccine by exposing it to water, and the patch gives visualized signal to notify users whether the status of engineered bacteria is all right and when to stick the patch to arms. We achieve this simply with the regulation of promoter 43, which is recognized by sigma factor A. The activity of promoter 43 is maximal during the exponential growth phase. In other words, we expect engineering Bacillus subtilis to express blue pigment a few hours before expressing massive antigens and adjuvants. It is the perfect time.</p> | <p>T-vaccine is also a user-friendly product. Our potential users are not medical professionals, they activate T-vaccine by exposing it to water, and the patch gives visualized signal to notify users whether the status of engineered bacteria is all right and when to stick the patch to arms. We achieve this simply with the regulation of promoter 43, which is recognized by sigma factor A. The activity of promoter 43 is maximal during the exponential growth phase. In other words, we expect engineering Bacillus subtilis to express blue pigment a few hours before expressing massive antigens and adjuvants. It is the perfect time.</p> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
<p>In B.subtilis, when it comes to the stationary phase, the environmental pressure increases and nutrition becomes limited, so B.subtilis begins to produce spore. Now the community will be divided into two different parts. One of them are trying to kill others to get enough nutrient, delaying the production of spores and achieving a competitive advantage. Killing is mediated by the exported toxic protein SdpC. SdpI will appear on the membrane surface to avoid itself from being damaged. SdpI could bind free SdpC and autopressor SdpR, to remove inhibition of SdpR against I and R, to produce more SdpI to offset SdpC, finally guaranteeing the subgroup alive, thereby delaying the spores production.We transfer SdpC which is fused by promoter SdpI/R into high copy plasmids in order to damage the balance of the system, thereby killing whole colony. When SdpC appears, SdpI on the membrane will bind free SdpC and adsorb SdpR to cease its inhibition against SdpI P/R, trying to produce more SdpI. At the same time, it will activate the promoter SdpR/I in our circuits and generate more SdpC. The system would fall into an infinite loop, and according to our modeling,the amount of SdpC increases beyond the ability of SdpI. Thus, the cells with protection mechanism will crack and die because of too much SdpC. All of them formed the killing device.</p> | <p>In B.subtilis, when it comes to the stationary phase, the environmental pressure increases and nutrition becomes limited, so B.subtilis begins to produce spore. Now the community will be divided into two different parts. One of them are trying to kill others to get enough nutrient, delaying the production of spores and achieving a competitive advantage. Killing is mediated by the exported toxic protein SdpC. SdpI will appear on the membrane surface to avoid itself from being damaged. SdpI could bind free SdpC and autopressor SdpR, to remove inhibition of SdpR against I and R, to produce more SdpI to offset SdpC, finally guaranteeing the subgroup alive, thereby delaying the spores production.We transfer SdpC which is fused by promoter SdpI/R into high copy plasmids in order to damage the balance of the system, thereby killing whole colony. When SdpC appears, SdpI on the membrane will bind free SdpC and adsorb SdpR to cease its inhibition against SdpI P/R, trying to produce more SdpI. At the same time, it will activate the promoter SdpR/I in our circuits and generate more SdpC. The system would fall into an infinite loop, and according to our modeling,the amount of SdpC increases beyond the ability of SdpI. Thus, the cells with protection mechanism will crack and die because of too much SdpC. All of them formed the killing device.</p> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/8/89/2013ustc-china_killswitch1.png" width="580" height=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/8/89/2013ustc-china_killswitch1.png" width="580" height="160"/> |
<p>We Also designed a test circuit, which contains promotor grac and sdpABC only, aiming to determine the ability of SdpC.</p> | <p>We Also designed a test circuit, which contains promotor grac and sdpABC only, aiming to determine the ability of SdpC.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <div><h1>References<h1></div> | ||
+ | <div><p>1.Kang, T.J., et al., Expression of the B subunit of E. coli heat-labile enterotoxin in the chloroplasts of plants and its characterization. Transgenic Res, 2003. 12(6): p. 683-91.<br> | ||
+ | 2.Mrsny, R.J., et al., Bacterial toxins as tools for mucosal vaccination. Drug Discovery Today, 2002. 7(4): p. 247-258.<br> | ||
+ | 3."Role of the major antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in cell wall biogenesis." | ||
+ | Belisle J.T., Vissa V.D., Sievert T., Takayama K., Brennan P.J., Besra G.S. | ||
+ | Science 276:1420-1422(1997)<br> | ||
+ | 4."Evidence for a partial redundancy of the fibronectin-binding proteins for the transfer of mycoloyl residues onto the cell wall arabinogalactan termini of Mycobacterium tuberculosis." | ||
+ | Puech V., Guilhot C., Perez E., Tropis M., Armitige L.Y., Gicquel B., Daffe M.Mol. Microbiol. 44:1109-1122(2002)<br> | ||
+ | 5."The carboxyl-terminal end of protective antigen is required for receptor binding and anthrax toxin activity."Singh Y., Klimpel K.R., Quinn C.P., Chaudhary V.K., Leppla S.H. J. Biol. Chem. 266:15493-15497(1991)<br> | ||
+ | 6."Identification of a receptor-binding region within domain 4 of the protective antigen component of anthrax toxin." Varughese M., Teixeira A.V., Liu S., Leppla S.H. Infect. Immun. 67:1860-1865(1999)<br> | ||
+ | 7.Blumberg B, Alter H (1965). "A "new" antigen in leukemia sera". JAMA 191: 101–106.<br> | ||
+ | 8.Tiollais P, Christine P, Dejean A. The hepatitis B virus.Nature, 1985,371: 489.<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Latest revision as of 23:55, 27 September 2013