From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)

Latest revision as of 03:48, 29 October 2013

Module 1: Resource-full Waste

Non-recyclable waste is sourced from a recycling centre, placed in a bioreactor with our M.A.P.L.E system which degrades the waste and synthesises the bioplastic P(3HB). Click the tabs to find out more

Overview
Specifications
Design
Modelling
Assembly
Testing & results
Future work

Waste from recovery facilities is a mixture of plastics and cellulosic rich biomass such as fibres and wood. The Resource-full waste module utilises the large variety of materials organisms can naturally degrade to recycle the waste and to provide food for the production of the bioplastic poly-3-hydroxybutyrate, P(3HB).

Separating polyurethane and selling its breakdown products

Certain enzymes have the ability to degrade plastics as a result of their evolutionary history, dealing with tough and highly variable substrates such as lignin. Various enzymes have been biobricked to deal with most of the major petrochemical plastics, except for polyurethane. Polyurethane is one of the plastic constituents of this mixed waste. We have designed biobricks containing naturally occurring polyurethane esterases (also known as PUR esterases) to break polyurethane down into its constituent chemicals of ethylene glycol and poly(isocyanate). These valuable chemicals will be separated using specialised filters and sold back to industry.

Using the residual material as a substrate for P(3HB) production

The remaining organic portion of the mixed waste is used as a carbon source for P(3HB) production. P(3HB) is produced by organisms containing the pha CAB operon, originally found in soil bacteria such as Ralstonia eutropha. The operon contains three genes which are members of the pathway required to make P(3HB). P(3HB) is used as a storage molecule in the organisms which produce it. They do this when nutrients are limiting but when there is a plentiful carbon source.

P(3HB) is produced commercially by several companies. One of the crucial factors in whether production is economical or not is the efficiency of bioplastic production. We have hugely increased the efficiency of P(3HB) production; an important step in making our system feasible.

To scale up the production of P(3HB), our system would require large amounts of purified sugars. We would, therefore, hydrolyse the long polysaccharide components to release the sugars. This is a current industrial pre-treatment technique to allow the fermentation of ligno-cellulosic biomass.

References:

Harding KG, Dennis JS, von Blottnitz H, Harrison STL. Environmental analysis of plastic production processes: Comparing petroleum-based polypropylene and polyethylene with biologically-based poly-beta-hydroxybutyric acid using life cycle analysis. J Biotechnol 2007 MAY 31;130(1):57-66.
Kim S, Dale BE. Energy and Greenhouse Gas Profiles of Polyhydroxybutyrates Derived from Corn Grain: A Life Cycle Perspective. Environ Sci Technol 2008 OCT 15;42(20):7690-7695.
Kendall A. A life cycle assessment of biopolymer production from material recovery facility residuals. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 61 (2012) 69– 74
Chul-Hyung Kang, Ki-Hoon Oh, Mi-Hwa Lee, Tae-Kwang Oh, Bong Hee Kim, Jung- Hoon Yoon. A novel family VII esterase with industrial potential from compost metagenomic libraryMicrobial Cell Factories 2011, 10:41 doi:10.1186/1475-2859-10-41
Da Almeida, Alejandra. Effect of the granule associated protein phasin (PhaP) on cell growth and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) accumulation from glycerol in bioreactor cultures of recombinant E. coli. Volume 131, Issue 2, Supplement, September 2007, Pages S167.

Specification

1. Our bacteria should survive and grow in mixed waste

In order for the bacteria to produce bioplastic from the mixed waste they first need to be able to use it as a carbon source

2. Our bacteria should secrete a functional polyurethane esterase

To recover the resources from polyurethane in the mixed waste, the enzymes should secrete in an active form.

3. Our bacteria should be able to tolerate mixed waste degradation products, such as ethylene glycol

The products of polyurethane degradation are toxic and so any bacteria growing with them must be able to survive to a concentration which will allow economical production of ethylene glycol. We have chosen a strain of E.coli-MG1655, which is resistant to ethylene glycol toxicity.

4. Our bacteria should produce P(3HB)

5. Our bacteria should produce P(3HB) from the mixed waste

PUR Degradation: Pathway ▼

Lignin degrading microbial enzymes are capable of degrading plastics. Some previous iGEM teams have exploited this ability. We have built on their work and extended the plastic degradation capabilities of the synthetic biology community by improving polyurethane (PUR) degradation, as this has not been successfully achieved before. We have identified 5 PUR-esterase enzymes from the literature that are capable of catalyzing the below reaction.

We have synthesised all of the genes in the below table and are testing them for expression in E.coli, secretion, activity and PUR degradation capabilities. Our ultimate design is to be able to control the relative levels of different enzymes in a waste-degrading bio-reactor, in order to adjust it to the composition of waste. We have, therefore, designed the expression constructs accordingly. Our models predict the degradation rate of polyurethane at the bioreactor scale. .

PUR Degradation: BioBrick Designs ▼

enzyme	source organism	biobrick	reference
EstCS2	uncultured unknown bacterium (GU256649.1)	BBa_K1149002	Kang et.al 2011
pueA	Pseudomonas chlororaphis	BBa_K1149003	Stern et al., 2000
pueB	Pseudomonas chlororaphis	BBa_K1149004	Howard et al., 2001
pudA	Comamonas acidovorans	BBa_K1149005	Allen et al. 1999
pulA	Pseudomonas fluorescens	BBa_K1149006	Vega et al., 1999

Secretion Strategy:

E.coli is commonly used as a chassis in innovative iGEM projects that aim to prove a concept and make the case for a novel function in a biologically engineered machine. In our case, we aim to degrade and synthesise plastic and the degradation part of our system needs to be extracellular. There are many strategies for secretion. You can read about these on our Secretion Guide page and find the corresponding biobricks and projects. If you are currently in the process of designing a Genetically Engineered Machine in E.coli, this page provides a good starting point to look for information.

We chose the pelB secretion tag as it has been demonstrated to work in many cases, sometimes with very high transport efficiency (1)(2). pelB has been used in iGEM projects for many years and is part of 50+ constructs. The UC-Davis team last year used it to secrete LC-Cutinase, a PET plastic degrading enzyme [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K936013 (BBa_K936013)] successfully, which is somewhat similar to our plastic-degrading enzymes.

Safety:

We considered the safety aspects of using the PudA enzyme, since its sequences were originally from a Risk Group 2 (RG2) organism. We submitted our safety information to iGEM for review. Safety forms were approved on October 2nd, 2013 by the iGEM Safety Committee. We did not use the organism only the part itself and the final sequences were codon optimised for expression in E. coli, which included the elimination of the forbidden restriction sites.

References

Thanassi DG, Hultgren SJ. Multiple pathways allow protein secretion across the bacterial outer membrane. Current opinion in cell biology 2000;12(4) 420-430.
Sletta H, Tondervik A, Hakvag S, Aune TEV, Nedal A, Aune R, et al. The presence of N-terminal secretion signal sequences leads to strong stimulation of the total expression levels of three tested medically important proteins during high-cell-density cultivations of E.coli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2007;73(3) 906-912.

Bioplastic Synthesis: Pathway ▼

Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate P(3HB) is a polyester which is naturally produced inside bacteria such as Ralstonia eutropha, where it accumulates as granules inside the cell. In its native bacteria it is produced as an energy store (1).It's properties as a plastic has gained it the attention of researchers and industrialists. In our system, the bacteria will take up organic molecules from waste and use them for P(3HB) production.

We have made P(3HB) in E.coli, transferring three genes naturally found in Ralstonia eutropha into E.coli MG1655. These encode the three enzymes necessary for P(3HB) production; polyhydroxyalkanoate synthase(phaC), 3-ketothiolase(phaA) and acetoacetyl coenzyme A reductase(phaB). These are encoded by the pha CAB operon. We have altered the expression of these three genes to maximise the production of P(3HB) as high yields are required for it to be economically viable.

3-ketothiolase:

Acetoacetyl coenzyme A reductase:

Polyhydroxyalkanoate synthase:

Bioplastic Synthesis: Biobrick Designs ▼

We used the pha CAB biobrick [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K934001 BBa_K934001] to produce P(3HB) which contains the native operon of Ralstonia eutropha. Inthe future we would like to see our system implemented at an industrial scale. This requires high yields to be economically viable. We created P(3HB) synthesis models to inform our experimental attempts to increase P(3HB) yield. We were especially interested to find out if up or down-regulation of any of the enzymes involved in the biosynthetic pathway could increase yields. To analyse this, we needed to know the reactions in the metabolic pathway and also the relative parameters of the enzymes and their dynamic relationships in order to identify bottlenecks in the flux of metabolites. The results from the metabolic model suggest that the amount of pha B is especially critical and increasing its level should give us more P(3HB). (Please see our modelling section for details.) To do this, we designed constructs with stronger promoters to up-regulate the expression of the operon.

We designed and constructed two new constructs for increased expression of the operon (including pha B). The first construct uses the constitutive promoter [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23104 J23104] and the [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0034 RBS 0034] with a following scar site TACTAGAG in front of the ATG of the pha C gene. The second construct was designed as a hybrid promoter incorporating BBa_J23104 and the original promoter first, followed by the native promoter and RBS, due to recent results of high expression from a hybrid promoter[http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0056321]. The region containing the native promoter and RBS is 352 nucleotides long and might contain important regulatory elements and therefore we were interested to test the hybrid construct in comparison to both the native and constitutive promoter configurations.</

Chassis Design: Tolerance to Waste ▼

We chose the MG1655 E.coli strain as chassis because it constitutively expresses genes that make it resistant to toxic waste degradation products, such as Ethylene glycol. The [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K892010 aldA] and [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K892009 fucO] genes have an important role in decreasing the toxic effects of ethylene glycol by converting it into glycolaldehyde which is a link to the cell`s central metabolism. We have received these genes from the registry and future work could be to express these in Bacillus or cellulose-degrading organisms to make them tolerant as well.

Enzyme Secretion Strategy ▼

E.coli is commonly used as a chassis in innovative iGEM projects that aim to prove a concept and make the case for a novel function in a biologically engineered machine. In our case, we aim to degrade and synthesise plastic and the degradation part of our system needs to be extracellular. There are many strategies for secretion. You can read about these on our Secretion Guide page and find the corresponding biobricks and projects. If you are currently in the process of designing a Genetically Engineered Machine in E.coli, this page provides a good starting point to look for information.

We chose the pelB secretion tag as it has been demonstrated to work in many cases, sometimes with very high transport efficiency (3). pelB has been used in iGEM projects for many years and is part of 50+ constructs. The UC-Davis team last year used it to secrete LC-Cutinase, a PET plastic degrading enzyme [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K936013(BBa_K936013)] successfully, which is somewhat similar to our plastic-degrading enzymes.

References

Economou A. Following the leader: bacterial protein export through the Sec pathway. Trends in microbiology 1999;7(8) 315-320.
Thanassi DG, Hultgren SJ. Multiple pathways allow protein secretion across the bacterial outer membrane. Current opinion in cell biology 2000;12(4) 420-430.
Sletta H, Tondervik A, Hakvag S, Aune TEV, Nedal A, Aune R, et al. The presence of N-terminal secretion signal sequences leads to strong stimulation of the total expression levels of three tested medically important proteins during high-cell-density cultivations of E.coli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2007;73(3) 906-912.

Safety ▼

Safety issues regarding our chassis can be found here.

Modelling

What we learnt from the PUR degradation model:

The model assisted the design of enzyme assays, in particular:
The toxicity of the PUR degradation product, Ethylene glycol was taken into account in the modelling and it successfully determined the maximum tolerance of the system.
Ethylene glycol toxicity assays were carried out in the wet lab and were designed according to the results from our model.

What we learnt from the P(3HB) synthesis model:

Scanning concentration of pha B and sensitivity analysis showed that increasing the concentration of pha B would increase the production rate of P(3HB) in our engineered 'E.coli'.
Simulations showed that the constitutive promoter J23104 could lead to a higher expression of pha B than the native promoter. As a result the Wet lab team designed and built [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051 BBa_K1149051], which significantly increased bioplastic production.
Results from the metabolic model suggested that the synthesis of P(3HB) would be accompanied by a drop of ATP over time and hence allowed us to identify potential limitations of our engineered system. This is important for the Industrial Implementation of our system.

1.0 Polyurethane (PUR) degradation model ▼

Introduction

The efficiencies for polyurethane (PUR) degradation and ethylene glycol production are important for the performance of our system. We built a mathematical and deterministic model that is based on MATLAB extension Simbiology for polyurethane degradation. The model contains the kinetic properties of degradation enzymes that are helpful for the design of assays. As we scaled up the initial concentrations of all substrates to meet the conditions for a bio-reactor, the model can provide preliminary simulations and predictions for the MAPLE system.

Design

Objective

Here are some specific objectives for the model to achieve:

1. The model should contain the gene expression model of the degradation enzymes because the enzyme concentration determines the rate of plastic degradation. In our case for PUR degradation, we used [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K206000 pBAD strong promoter K206000] for most enzymes. We built the gene expression model based on inducible pBAD promoter, which gene expression rate can be regulated by inducer concentration.

2. The model should show the efficiency of the enzyme secretion to the culture from the cells. It's also important because the enzyme concentration in the culture depends on it. Here we used pelB secretion tag for most enzymes in order to achieve a high efficiency.

3. The model basically predicts how long will take to degrade a known concentration of soluble polyurethane. It is assumed that the enzyme in our assays has the same kinetic properties as the enzyme used in the literature. The model can suggest a suitable concentration of the plastic to use in order to get good results from the assays.

4. It is known that ethylene glycol is toxic to E.coli. It has, however, no clear effect on the growth of our MG1655 strain when the concentration of ethylene glycol is below 200 mM. The model, therefore, should suggest a safe range of polyurethane concentration to avoid a high concentration (>200mM) of ethylene glycol produced.

The Model

Polyurethane (PUR) degradation involves 5 different degradation enzymes:

enzyme	source organism	biobrick	reference
EstCS2	uncultured unknown bacterium (GU256649.1)	[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149002 BBa_K1149002]	[http://www.microbialcellfactories.com/content/10/1/41 Kang et.al 2011]
pueA	Pseudomonas chlororaphis	[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149003 BBa_K1149003]	[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09056.x/pdf Stern et al., 2000]
pueB	Pseudomonas chlororaphis	[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149004 BBa_K1149004]	[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830501000427 Howard et al., 2001]
pudA	Comamonas acidovorans	[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149005 BBa_K1149005]	[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830598000663 Allen et al. 1999]
pulA	Pseudomonas fluorescens	[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149006 BBa_K1149006]	[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830598000687 Vega et al., 1999]

4 of the 5 enzymes are not well characterised before, so we could't find enough kinetic data from the literature. The only well-characterised PUR degradation enzyme PudA is used in the model as an illustration of all PUR degradation enzymes. The model will be more complete when the kinetic data of the other enzymes are defined. The finished PUR degradation model is shown as below:

There are two compartments which represents cells and the culture from left to right. The "cell" compartment contains the gene expression module whereas the "culture" compartment contains the degradation module. The "secretion" block that connects two compartments is the secretion module.

Parameters and assumptions

Parameter	Description	Value	Units	Source	Assumptions/Notes
β	maximum rate of transcription	0.015	mM/min	Please see derivation 1 below.	Please see derivation 1 below.
K	Activation coefficient	0.0031	mM	[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K206000:Characterization]	Taking the "switch point" as the activation coefficient
d_mRNA	mRNA degradation rate	0.035	1/min	[http://jb.asm.org/content/189/23/8746.full]	There is no active degradation pathway and that dilution is the dominant way by which it degrades. Rate = ln2/doubling time, where doubling time of strain MG1655 = 20min. Assuming steady-state growth in LB broth as presented in paper. rate = ln2/20 = 0.035/min
d_protein	Protein degradation rate	0.035	1/min	[http://jb.asm.org/content/189/23/8746.full]	There is no active degradation pathway and that dilution is the dominant way by which it degrades. Rate = ln2/doubling time, where doubling time of strain MG1655 = 20min. Assuming steady-state growth in LB broth as presented in paper. rate = ln2/20 = 0.035/min
k₂	Protein production rate (PudA)	2.2	1/min	Please see derivation 2 below.	Please see derivation 2 below.
[Arabinose]	Concentration of arabinose	Initial: 0.008	mM	-	-
[mRNA]	Concentration of mRNA	-	mM	-	-
[PudA]	Concentration of PudA	-	mM	-	-

1.Derivation of the maximal expression rate,β

Average molecular weight (Mw) of a base pair = 660g/mol[http://www.geneinfinity.org/sp/sp_dnaprop.html][http://www.lifetechnologies.com/uk/en/home/references/ambion-tech-support/rna-tools-and-calculators/dna-and-rna-molecular-weights-and-conversions.html]
Average mass of a base pair = 660g/mol x 1.66x10^-24 = 1.1x10^-21g
Volume of an E.coli cell = 1µm³[http://kirschner.med.harvard.edu/files/bionumbers/fundamentalBioNumbersHandout.pdf] = 1x10^-15L
- ∴Mass concentration =
- ∴Molar concentration of 1 base pair in the volume of E.coli = = 1.66x10^-6 mM
BioBrick assembly plasmid pSB1C3 is a high copy number plasmid (100-300 copies per cell)[http://parts.igem.org/Part:pSB1C3?title=Part:pSB1C3]
- assume 200 copies per cell
∴ concentration of the gene per cell = N x 200 x 1.66x10^-6mM, where N = number of base pairs
- ∴ concentration of the gene PudA (N = 1644) in the volume of an E.coli cell is = 0.55mM
Transcription rate in E.coli = 80bp/s[http://kirschner.med.harvard.edu/files/bionumbers/fundamentalBioNumbersHandout.pdf] = 80 x 1.66x10^-6mM/s = 80 x 1.66x10^-6 x 60mM/min = 7.97x10^-3mM/min
∴ Rate of mRNA_pudA production under the control of pBAD = 7.97x10^-3 ÷ 0.25 = 0.015/min

2.Protein production rate of PudA, k₂

Average molecular weight(Mw) of an amino acid(aa)= 110g/mol[http://www.genscript.com/conversion.html][http://www.promega.com/~/media/Files/Resources/Technical%20References/Amino%20Acid%20Abbreviations%20and%20Molecular%20Weights.pdf]
Average mass of an amino acid = 110g/mol x 1.66x10^-24=1.83x10^-22g/L
- ∴Mass concentration of one aa in the volume of an E.coli = = 1.83x10^-6g/L
- ∴Molar concentration of one aa = = 1.66x10^-5mM
Translation rate = 20aa/s = (20 x 1.66x10^-5 x 60)mM/min = 0.020mM/min
PudA comprises of 548aa[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830598000663]
- ∴concentration of PudA's aa in the volume of an E.coli = 1.66x10^-5mM x 548 = 9.10x10^-3mM
∴ Rate of protein production = 0.020 ÷ 4.25x10^-3 = 2.2/min

PUR degradation module

The reaction equation of the PUR degradation is:

[Polyurethane]+[PudA]= 4 [ethylene glycol] + 4 [polyisocyanate] + [PudA]

Assumptions:

We assumed 1 mole of polyurethane dispersion can produce 4 moles of ethylene glycol.

The molecular weight of a single polyurethane monomer is 470 g/mol whereas the molecular weight of the polyurethane dispersion is around 2000 g/mol.[http://www.polyurethanes.basf.de/pu/solutions/en/content/group/Arbeitsgebiete_und_Produkte/Grundprodukte/Lupraphen-Produktuebersicht_Gewicht]Therefore, the short-chain polyurethane consists approximately 4 monomers. 4 molecules of ethylene glycol will be produced by degrading one chain of polymer.

We also assumed a simple Michaelis-Menten mechanism for PudA

"[PudA]"is the concentration of the PudA enyme whereas "[Polyurethane]" is the concentration of the polyurethane. The kinetic parameters are defined as below:

Parameter	Description	Value	Units	Sources	Species
Km	Michaelis constant	51.5	mM	[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830598000663]	Comamonasacidovorans
Kcat	Turnover number	141.75	1/min	[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830598000663]	Comamonasacidovorans

Assumptions:

1. The kinetic parameters of PudA are not from the strain E.coli K12 MG1665 we are using. So the assumption here is that the kinetic property of pudA in E.coli is close to that in Comamonasacidovorans

2. Considerations of temperature change and PH change are not included in the model. Therefore, the assumption is that they remain constant during the degradation

Secretion module

The efficiency of Secretion is assumed to be 90% secretion over 2 hours.[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1251600/] The rate of secretion in the model is therefore:

rate of secretion = 0.9[concentration of PudA]/120 (mM/mins)

Simulation Results and Industrial Implementation

The simulation result we worked out is especially related to the industrial degradation SRF which we aim to achieve a high degradation efficiency. According to the data we estimated for the percentage Polyurethane in SRF, we have about 5% Polyurethane contained in the waste. Therefore, in the model, we assumed 50g of polyurethane in 1kg of SRF based on the estimation. If we put 1kg of waste into a 5L bioreactor, the approximate concentration of polyurethane would be 5mM. Here is the simulation result:

The modelling result shows that we can efficiently degrade Polyurethane in SRF even in industrial scale. 5mM of polyurethane dispersion can be efficiently degraded in 15 mins. The final concentration of ethylene glycol we produced would be 20 mM that is under the toxicity limitation, this proves that our bio-reactor can maintain the efficiency without the toxicity effects.

As for the implementation of MAPLE system, the polyurethane degradation enzymes in our system are very efficient. Therefore, we need an efficient filter which removing ethylene glycol from the system.

PUR degradation model:Download

2.0 P(3HB) synthesis model ▼

This section is about modelling the plastic-synthesising E.coli developed in our project. The plastic that this module synthesises is the bioplastic poly-3-hydroxybutyrate, also known as P(3HB). The content below shows the process of building, designing and optimising the model. Also, the considerations, assumptions and limitations will be discussed.

The model was built and simulated in Simbiology, a Matlab package designed for modelling biological systems. In our model we have a compartment (labelled "E.coli_1") that represents our engineered cell. The compartment contains the reactions and species that interact with the polymer synthesis pathway.

Here is our model for P(3HB) synthesis. It is part of module 1, this model uses glucose from waste as the input. Here we have the phaCAB operon, which convertsthe metabolite acetyl-coA into poly-3-hydroxybutyrate. We integrated our synthetic pathway into the metabolic pathway. This allowed us to quantitatively predict the P(3HB) production over time. More details about the metabolic model can be found in Module 2.

Firstly, consider the model concerning the synthetic pathway. This model does not take into account the existence of the metabolic pathway present within the bacteria. The synthetic pathway is mainly used for a sensitivity analysis by assuming minimum interference to the cell metabolism. The pathway is rearranged for clarity.

The pathways on the right half of the cell are genetic expressions of the 3 enzymes involved in the plastic synthesis pathway. The pathways on the left represent the actual P(3HB) production pathway.

As can be seen in the Key (above), the yellow, solid circle represents a reaction object and for each object parameter the following needs to be specified for the simulation to work:

Rate equation or kinetic law (e.g. mass action, Michaelis-Menten etc.)
Parameters in the rate equation
Species involved in the reaction
Value and units for each parameter

Simbiology will then use an ODE solver (ode15 or sundial) to solve these ODEs and give a plot of the specified output(s) (concentration level of a species over time, for instance).

Note that 3HB deg, Acetoacetate deg, AcetoacetylCoA deg and 3HB-CoA deg are degradation rates (all = 0.035/min, please see assumptions below) of the corresponding species formed along the P(3HB) synthesis pathway.

2.1 Ordinary Differential Equations ▼

Genetic regulations and expressions

BDH2 (3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase)

Schematic of the gene expression of BDH2 as seen in the model diagram

PhaB (Acetoacetyl-CoA reductase)and PhaC (P(3HB) synthase)

Schematic of the gene expression of PhaB and PhaC as seen in the model diagram

Values, sources and assumptions ▼

Parameter	Description	Value	Units	Sources	Assumptions/Notes
β	maximum rate of transcription	0.032	mM/min	Please see derivation 1 below.	Please see derivation 1 below.
n	Hill coefficient	2.0	dimensionless	[http://parts.igem.org/Part:pSB1C3?title=Part:pSB1C3]	For pBAD strong. Taken from the parts registry page. Rounded to 2.0 from 2.26 as Simbiology wouldn't allow a non-integer value for such parameter.
K	Activation coefficient	0.0031	mM	[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K206000:Characterization]	For pBAD strong. Taking the "switch point" (from the corresponding parts registry page) as the activation coefficient.
d_mRNA	mRNA degradation rate	0.035	1/min	[http://jb.asm.org/content/189/23/8746.full]	There is no active degradation pathway and that dilution is the dominant way by which it degrades. Rate = ln2/doubling time, where doubling time of strain MG1655 = 20min. Assuming steady-state growth in LB broth as presented in paper. rate = ln2/20 = 0.035/min
d_protein	Protein degradation rate	0.035	1/min	[http://jb.asm.org/content/189/23/8746.full]	There is no active degradation pathway and that dilution is the dominant way by which it degrades. Rate = ln2/doubling time, where doubling time of strain MG1655 = 20min. Assuming steady-state growth in LB broth as presented in paper. rate = ln2/20 = 0.035/min
k₂	Protein production rate (BDH2)	4.7	1/min	Please see derivation 2 below.	Please see derivation 2 below.
k₃	Protein production rate (PhaCB)	0.58	mM/min	Please see derivation 3 below.	Please see derivation 3 below.
[Arabinose]	Concentration of arabinose	Initial: 0.008	mM	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"
[mRNA]	Concentration of mRNA	-	mM	-	-
[BDH2]	Concentration of BDH2	-	mM	-	-
[PhaB]	Concentration of PhaB	-	mM	-	-
[PhaC]	Concentration of PhaC	-	mM	-	-

Derivations ▼

1.Derivation of the maximal expression rate,β

Average molecular weight (Mw) of a base pair = 660g/mol[http://www.geneinfinity.org/sp/sp_dnaprop.html][http://www.lifetechnologies.com/uk/en/home/references/ambion-tech-support/rna-tools-and-calculators/dna-and-rna-molecular-weights-and-conversions.html]
Average mass of a base pair = 660g/mol x 1.66x10^-24 = 1.1x10^-21g
Volume of an E.coli cell = 1µm³[http://kirschner.med.harvard.edu/files/bionumbers/fundamentalBioNumbersHandout.pdf] = 1x10^-15L
- ∴Mass concentration =
- ∴Molar concentration of 1 base pair in the volume of E.coli = = 1.66x10^-6 mM
BioBrick assembly plasmid pSB1C3 is a high copy number plasmid (100-300 copies per cell)[http://parts.igem.org/Part:pSB1C3?title=Part:pSB1C3]
- assume 200 copies per cell
∴ concentration of the gene per cell = N x 200 x 1.66x10^-6mM, where N = number of base pairs
- ∴ concentration of the gene BDH2 (N = 768) in the volume of an E.coli cell is = 0.25mM
Transcription rate in E.coli= 80bp/s[http://kirschner.med.harvard.edu/files/bionumbers/fundamentalBioNumbersHandout.pdf] = 80 x 1.66x10^-6mM/s = 80 x 1.66x10^-6 x 60mM/min = 7.97x10^-3mM/min
∴ Rate of mRNA_BDH2 production under the control of pBAD = 7.97x10^-3 ÷ 0.25 = 0.032/min

2.Protein production rate of BDH2, k₂

Average molecular weight(Mw) of an amino acid(aa)= 110g/mol[http://www.genscript.com/conversion.html][http://www.promega.com/~/media/Files/Resources/Technical%20References/Amino%20Acid%20Abbreviations%20and%20Molecular%20Weights.pdf]
Average mass of an amino acid = 110g/mol x 1.66x10^-24=1.83x10^-22g/L
- ∴Mass concentration of one aa in the volume of an E.coli = = 1.83x10^-6g/L
- ∴Molar concentration of one aa = = 1.66x10^-5mM
Translation rate = 20aa/s = (20 x 1.66x10^-5 x 60)mM/min = 0.020mM/min
BDH2 comprises of 256aa[http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q2PEN2&format=html]
- ∴concentration of BDH2's aa in the volume of an E.coli= 1.66x10^-5mM x 256 = 4.25x10^-3mM
∴ Rate of protein production = 0.020 ÷ 4.25x10^-3 = 4.7/min

3.Protein production rate for PhaB and PhaC, k₃

Relative promoter strengths: J23104 = 1.3RPU, J23101 = 1.0RPU.[http://sb6.biobricks.org/poster/automated-bioparts-characterisation-for-synthetic-biology/]
- ∴ 104 is 1.3x stronger than 101.
In absolute units: take GFP synthesis rate (molecules per min per cell) and approximate that as a generic protein synthesis rate for the promoter.
- GFP synthesis rate of 101 = 2232 molecules per min per cell.[http://sb6.biobricks.org/poster/automated-bioparts-characterisation-for-synthetic-biology/]
- ∴ GFP synthesis rate of 104 = 1.3 x 2232 = 2902 molecules per min per cell
Assume 1 molecule in an E.coli cell gives a concentration of 1nM.
- ∴ GFP synthesis rate of 104 = 2902 x 1nM = 2.9x10^-6nM/min per cell
Plasmid copy number assumed as 200 (as in derivation 1)
- ∴ GFP synthesis rate of 104 in our E.coli = 200 x 2.9x10^-6 = 0.00058nM/min = 0.58mM/min

2.2 Enzyme kinetics ▼

Note:
- v = velocity of reaction
- Ac-CoA = acetyl-CoA
- AcAc-CoA = Acetoacetyl-CoA
- AcAc = acetoacetate

BDH2 (3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase)

Reaction R1:

Reaction R1r:

Values, sources and assumptions

Parameter	Description	Value	Units	Source	Assumptions/Notes
k_{cat,BDH2_f}	Turnover number of BDH2 in forward reaction	22200	1/min	[http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2009/01/03/jb.mvn186.full.pdf]	Sequences derived from Pseudomonas fragi but kinetic values from expression and purification of enzymes in E. coli XL1 Blue
k_{cat,BDH2_r}	Turnover number of BDH2 in reverse reaction	7200	1/min	[http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2009/01/03/jb.mvn186.full.pdf]	Sequences derived from Pseudomonas fragi but kinetic values from expression and purification of enzymes in E. coli XL1 Blue
K_i,NAD+	Inhibition constant of BDH2 with NAD+	2.5	mM	[http://www.hal.inserm.fr/hal-00374321/]	Organism Tetrahymena pyriformis
K_i,NADH	Inhibition constant of BDH2 with NADH	1.1	mM	[http://www.hal.inserm.fr/hal-00374321/]	Organism Tetrahymena pyriformis
K_m,AcAc	Michaelis constant for AcAc	0.37	mM	[http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2009/01/03/jb.mvn186.full.pdf]	Values in paper reference
K_m,NAD+	Michaelis constant for NAD+	0.24	mM	[http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2009/01/03/jb.mvn186.full.pdf]	Values in paper reference
K_m,NADH	Michaelis constant for NADH	0.010	mM	[http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2009/01/03/jb.mvn186.full.pdf]	Values in paper reference
K_m,3HB	Michaelis constant for 3HB	0.80	mM	[http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2009/01/03/jb.mvn186.full.pdf]	source organism Pseudomonas fragi
[BDH2]	Concentration of BDH2	-	mM	-	-
[NAD+]	Concentration of NAD+	initial: 1.6x10^-13	mM	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"
[3HB]	Intracellular concentration of 3HB	6.4x10^-14	mM	-	External concentration of 3HB assumed to be 0.01g. This is shared by 1.5x10¹² cells. Therefore, one cell has 0.01/1.5x10¹² = 6.7x10^-15 g. To convert it into mol/L: mass of 3HB/molar mass of 3HB = 6.7x10^-15/104.1 = 6.4x10^-17 M = 6.4x10^-14 mM
[AcAc]	Concentration of AcAc	initial: 1.0x10^-13	mM	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"
[NADH]	Concentration of NADH	initial: 2.5x10^-14	mM	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"

atoAD (Acetyl-CoA:acetoacetyl-CoA transferase (α and β subunits))

Reaction R2:

Reaction R2r:

Values, sources and assumptions

Parameter	Description	Value	Units	Sources	Assumptions/Notes
V_{max,atoAD_f}	Maximum rate of atoAD in forward reaction	0.00244	mM/min	[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000398617590003X]	Enzyme is naturally expressed in E.coli: assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.
V_{max,atoAD_r}	Maximum rate of atoAD in reverse reaction	0.0108	mM/min	[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000398617590003X]	Enzyme is naturally expressed in E.coli: assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.
K_m,AcAc	Michaelis constant for AcAc	1.86	mM	[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000398617590003X]	Enzyme is naturally expressed in E.coli: assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.
K_m,Ac-CoA	Michaelis constant for Ac-CoA	0.26	mM	[http://www.brenda-enzymes.org/php/result_flat.php4?ecno=2.8.3.8]	Enzyme is naturally expressed in E.coli: assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.
K_m,Acetate	Michaelis constant for Acetate	53.1	mM	[http://aem.asm.org/content/73/24/7814.full.pdf]	Enzyme is naturally expressed in E.coli: assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.
K_m,AcAc-CoA	Michaelis constant for AcAc-CoA	0.035	mM	[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000398617590003X]	Enzyme is naturally expressed in E.coli: assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.
[AcAc]	Concentration of AcAc	initial: 1.0x10^-13	mM	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"
[Acetate]	Concentration of Acetate	initial: 1.0x10^-13	mM	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"
[AcAc-CoA]	Concentration of AcAc-CoA	initial: 1.0x10^-13	mM	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"
[Ac-CoA]	Concentration of Ac-CoA	initial: 1.0x10^-14	mM	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"

phaB (Acetoacetyl-CoA reductase)

Reaction R3:

Reaction R3r:

Values, sources and assumptions

Parameter	Description	Value	Units	Sources	Assumptions/Notes
k_{cat,PhaB_f}	Turnover number of PhaB in forward reaction	6120	1/min	[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23913421]	Gene in Ralstonia eutropha was engineered to put in E.coli and then purified
k_{cat,PhaB_r}	Turnover number of PhaB in reverse reaction	3600	1/min	[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3286259]	originally in Zoogloea ramigera, expressed in E.coli and then purified
K_m,NADPH	Michaelis constant for NADPH	0.15	mM	[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23913421]	Gene in Ralstonia eutropha was engineered to put in E.coli and then purified
K_m,AcAc-CoA	Michaelis constant for AcAc-CoA	0.0057	mM	[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23913421]	Gene in Ralstonia eutropha was engineered to put in E.coli and then purified
K_m,NADP+	Michaelis constant for NADP+	0.0060	mM	[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb12740.x/pdf]	purified from Methylobacterium extorquens
K_m,3HB-CoA	Michaelis constant for 3HB-CoA	0.026	mM	[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3286259]	originally in Zoogloea ramigera, expressed in E.coli and then purified
[PhaB]	Concentration of PhaB	-	mM	-	-
[AcAc-CoA]	Concentration of AcAc-CoA	initial: 1.0x10^-13	mM	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"
[NADPH]	Concentration of NADPH	initial:3.8x10^-14	mM	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"
[NADP+]	Concentration of NADP+	initial:1.5x10^-13	mM	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"
[3HB-CoA]	Concentration of 3HB-CoA	-	mM	-	-

phaC (P(3HB) synthase)

Reaction R4:

Values, sources and assumptions

Parameter	Description	Value	Units	Sources	Assumptions/Notes
k_cat,PhaC	Turnover number of PhaC	1680	1/min	[http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0003986101925226/1-s2.0-S0003986101925226-]	-
K_m,PhaC	Michaelis constant of PhaC with 3HB-CoA	0.14	mM	[http://www.brenda-enzymes.org/php/result_flat.php4?ecno=2.3.1.B5]	Enzyme is naturally expressed in E.coli: assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.
[PhaC]	Concentration of PhaC	-	mM	-	-
[3HB-CoA]	Concentration of 3HB-CoA	-	mM	-	-

atoB (acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase)

Reaction R5:

Reaction R5r:

Values, sources and assumptions

Parameter	Description	Value	Units	Sources	Assumptions/Notes
V_{max,atoB_f}	Maximum rate of atoB in forward reaction	3.8x10^-5	mM/min	[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9904]	Enzyme is naturally expressed in E.coli: assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.
V_{max,atoB_r}	Maximum rate of atoB in reverse reaction	8.5x10^-4	mM/min	[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9904]	Enzyme is naturally expressed in E.coli: assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.
K_m,atoB	Michaelis constant of atoB with Ac-CoA	0.47	mM	[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003986176901521]	Enzyme is naturally expressed in E.coli: assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.
K_m,AcAc-CoA	Michaelis constant for AcAc-CoA	0.1	mM	[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003986176901521]	Enzyme is naturally expressed in E.coli: assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.
K_m,CoA	Michaelis constant for CoA	0.25	mM	[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003986176901521]	Enzyme is naturally expressed in E.coli: assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.
[Ac-CoA]	Concentration of Ac-CoA	initial: 1.0x10^-13	mM	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"
[AcAc-CoA]	Concentration of AcAc-CoA	initial: 1.0x10^-13	mM	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"
[CoA]	Concentration of CoA	initial: 5.5x10^-13	mM	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"	see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"

Reaction kinetics and mechanisms ▼

List of enzymes and the corresponding mechanisms by which they work in the synthesis pathway

BDH2: Ordered-sequential bi-bi mechanism[http://www.brenda-enzymes.org/php/result_flat.php4?ecno=1.1.1.30]
atoAD: Ping-pong bi-bi mechanism[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000398617590003X]
atoB: Ping-pong bi-bi mechanism[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000398617590003X]
PhaB: Ordered-sequential bi-bi mechanism[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]
PhaC: Michaelis-Menten[http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/85133798/new-insights-activation-substrate-recognition-polyhydroxyalkanoate-synthase-from-ralstonia-eutropha]

2.3 Simulation results ▼

Using the values presented in the tables above, the deterministic model was simulated to see how much P(3HB) could be formed inside the cell. However, with the single cell model, it would be difficult to reflect how much of the plastic could actually be formed on a macroscopic scale. Therefore, modifications to the simulation algorithm were needed to give scaled-up simulation results.

In the scaled-up regime, though, new limitations were encountered. For example, growth, cell division and the concentration gradient that each cell encounters and how much can be taken up by the cells. Given the data available, what could be done was to assume that the bacteria were in a bioreactor, with constant nutrient and oxygen supply, and that they were in the phase of stationary growth (please see assumptions and explanations under the graphs below).

Here, three graphs are presented to show P(3HB)formation over time. The first two graphs are (i)single-cell model results, concentration in mM and (ii) single-cell model results, concentration in g/L. The first graph was the original graph produced from Simbiology as all concentrations were expressed in mM in the model. However, to gain a more intuitive sense of how much could be produced g/L was used. The third graph is the scaled-up simulation result.

(i) please see assumptions and explanations below

(ii) please see assumptions and explanations below

(iii) please see assumptions and explanations below

Graphs (i) and (ii): assumptions and explanations

To convert from mM to g/L:
- Molecular weight(Mw) of P(3HB) = 1.8x10¹²g/mol[http://webpages.charter.net/hvalentin/PDF-files/18.pdf]

(Please note that this value was taken from a paper about the "Production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) in recombinant Escherichia coli grown on glucose" instead of the production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate). However, this is the closest we managed to get as far as species, substrate and type of plastic are concerned.

Also, it was noticed that the molecular weight would change depending on the cultivation time (as conditions such as growth and pH can also affect it) and it was hard to find a paper that contains the exact same conditions and the range of cultivation times for our simulations. Furthermore, in reality there wouldn't be a single value of molecular weight obtained, but a range of values (known as polydispersity).[http://aem.asm.org/content/78/9/3177.full] Therefore, it was assumed that the molecular weight would remain constant during the time course of the simulation and that the value should be considered as an average.)

∴P(3HB)concentration in mM x 10^-3 x 1.8x10¹²g/mol = concentration in g/L

Graph (iii): assumptions and explanations

Assume 1.5x10¹²cells in a 1L broth, calculated from value obtained from BioNumbers. A range was given: 1-2x10⁹ cells/ml, so 1.5x10⁹ was taken. [http://bionumbers.hms.harvard.edu/bionumber.aspx?s=n&id=104831&ver=5]
- Conditions and considerations accompanying this value are:
  - growth medium: LB broth
  - Cultivation temperature: 37°C
  - wild-type E. coli K-12 strain MG1655 (NB: though not exactly our engineered one, it is the correct strain)
Assume stationary growth phase.
Assume that the amount of P(3HB) accumulated during the time course of simulation doesn't exceed the cell's capacity or ability to contain it.
Same metabolic considerations as above (single-cell results)
Simbiology single-cell simulation results multiplied by the number of cells stated above to give the red curve.

2.4 Model-guided design and optimisation ▼

Sensitivity analysis: species concentrations

What is sensitivity analysis and why do it?

In order to look at how we could increase the production of P(3HB) we decided to run a sensitivity analysis (also in Simbiology) to identify what species in the model P(3HB) is sensitive to, given the specific conditions with which we set the model. In other words, we calculated the time-dependent sensitivity of P(3HB) with respect to the initial conditions of other species (species formed along the synthesis pathway and enzymes involved).[http://www.mathworks.co.uk/help/simbio/ug/calculating-sensitivities.html#brbumlr|ref]

For a species x, whose concentration depends on time, it can be expressed as x(t). To calculate the sensitivity of x(t) with respect to another species y(t), the sensitivity with normalisation relative to the numerator x(t) can be calculated as:

Imperial College Sensitivity halfnorm.JPG

Therefore, the underlying algorithm for this sensitivity analysis of P(3HB) is:

Sensitivity analysis: enzyme concentrations

The sensitivity analysis of the enzymes involved in the synthetic pathway is carried out, which determine the most sensitive enzyme in the pathway

We plot a time integral of the sensitivity analysis which has the algorithm as:

The senstivity result is:

According to the simulation result, we found that the PHB production is highly sensitive to the concentration of PhaB and PhaC. In contrast, the system is not sensitive to the concentration of atoAD and atoB. In theory, increase the concentration of any of the enzyme will increase the flux of the system. However, for the strain E.coli K12 MG1655, both atoAD (acetoacetate:acetoacetyl-coA transferase) and atoB （acetoacetyl-coA thiolase) favour the reverse reactions, it becomes the rate limiting step in our pathway. Acetoacetyl-coA intends to be converted to acetoacetate instead of 3HB-coA. [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003986177904969]Therefore, the concentration of PhaB become really critical which push the system to flow in the forward direction.

Scan with different levels of PhaB

The plot below is to show that increasing PhaB concentration within the engineered organism would have a positive effect on the concentration of the P(3HB) synthesised. As so many parameters within the model were taken from different sources, it would be difficult to give a simulation plot that is accurate quantitatively. It was decided to show the single cell simulation for this because the scans were carried out up to the doubling time of 20mins, hence avoided the issue of scaling-up which would have otherwise subjected the simulation to more errors. Therefore, this plot should be interpreted from a qualitative perspective and the trend should be observed.

Imperial College PhaB scan Single cellmM.JPG

Difference between promoter expressions after optimisation

In order to choose the strongest promoter that is available to increase the gene expression. We ran a parameter scan of enzyme expression rates of a range of Anderson's constitutive promoters. The simulations shows the PHB production under different Anderson's promoters. The promoters we tested are:

promoter	biobrick	GFP synthesis rate (mM/min)
J23100	[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23100]	0.41
J23101	[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23101]	0.45
J23104	[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23104]	0.58
J23118	[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23118]	0.31

The derivations of the GFP synthesis rate are:

*Relative promoter strengths: J23104 = 1.3RPU, J23101 = 1.0RPU, J23100 = 0.92RPU, J23118 = 0.76RPU[http://sb6.biobricks.org/poster/automated-bioparts-characterisation-for-synthetic-biology/]

In absolute units: take GFP synthesis rate (molecules per min per cell) and approximate that as a generic protein synthesis rate for the promoter.
- GFP synthesis rate of 101 = 2232 molecules per min per cell.[http://sb6.biobricks.org/poster/automated-bioparts-characterisation-for-synthetic-biology/]
Assume 1 molecule in an E.coli cell gives a concentration of 1nM.
- ∴ GFP synthesis rate of 101 = 2232 x 1nM = 2.2x10^-6nM/min per cell
Plasmid copy number assumed as 200 (as in derivation 1)
- ∴ GFP synthesis rate of 101 in our E.coli = 200 x 2.2x10^-6 = 0.00045nM/min = 0.45mM/min
- ∴ The GFP synthesis rates of other promoters can be calculated by multiplying the RPU value with the GFP synthesis rate of J23101 promoter.

The simulation result:

Although there is just a small increase the gene expression rate, J23104 promoter achieved a much higher PHB production than other constitutive promoters. Therefore, we decided to use J23104 promoter for our improved biobrick [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051 BBa_K1149051].

Here is our experimental results that show we have 11 times more PHB after the change of promoter.

Comparison of P3HB production (left) 1.5ml tube, natural phaCAB (BBa_K934001) (right) 5ml tube, phaCAB expressed from the hybrid promoter, (BBa_K1149051).

P(3HB) synthesis model:Download

Additional script:Download

2.5 Metabolic considerations ▼

In Module 1: Resourceful Plastic, glucose from the degradation is used as the input for the system that produces P(3HB). The P(3HB) synthetic pathway hence needs to be adapted for this purpose. To do so, 3HB monomer would no longer be the source input to the engineered system. So, BDH2 should be removed from the pathway. Acetyl-coA would then become the key resource to produce P(3HB). Also, a metabolic model was needed to show the production of Acetyl-coA from glucose. Furthermore, our synthetic pathway involves several key metabolites from the pathway such as NADPH, NADP+, NADH and NAD+. The initial concentration of those metabolites can be determined from the metabolic model by assuming they are in their steady states. More features and results of the metabolic model can be found in Module 2.

Initial concentrations of metabolites

The model presented in Section 2.0 contains a synthesis pathway that interact metabolic species involved in so many other metabolic reactions elsewhere in the cell. It was, therefore, difficult to determine how much of these metabolites would be left available for our plastic synthesis pathway to utilise. So, a simple metabolic model of the cell (more detail in next paragraph) was needed to simulate and show insight into this problem. We decided to use the steady state levels of these metabolites (without the engineered pathway) and plug the values into the P(3HB) synthesis model in Section 2.0 as the initial concentrations.

The metabolic model involves two pathways - glycolysis pathway and the TCA cycle, where glucose is used as the sole carbon source. The reason is that glucose is directly taken by the glycolysis pathway and there are interactions between Acetyl-coA and TCA cycle. This Simbiology model is based on the one built by Angela Dixon in Predictive Mathematical Model for Polyhydroxybutyrate Synthesis in Escherichia coli.[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]. All reactions and pathways are based on ODEs and kinetics data presented in the original model. It can dynamically predict the concentration of all metabolites involved over a defined simulation time course.

The metabolic model for determining steady state concentrations is shown as below:

Keys:

The initial concentrations of all metabolites and kinetic data are referenced in the paper.[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/] The simulation of the metabolites is:

Table of initial and steady-state concentrations of the metabolites:

Substrates	Initial concentration	Steady state concentration	Units	Sources
NADH	200	250	uM	[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]
NAD+	1200	1600	uM	[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]
Acetyl-coA	1000	100	uM	[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]
Coenzyme A	250	5500	uM	[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]
NADPH	200	380	uM	[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]
NADP+	1200	1100	uM	[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]

<p align="justify"> It should also be noted that acetate, acetoacetate and acetoacetyl-CoA cannot be predicted by the metabolic model. Therefore, their initial concentrations are rough estimates (value similar to other metabolites) such that a reasonable P(3HB) output can be produced.

Assembling the optimised bioplastic producing operon

We made two new improved constructs by modifying the native operon:

The modellers in the drylab predicted that an increased level of pha B enzyme will increase the amount of PHB produced and therefore we decided to change the native Ralstonia eutropha promoter and RBS to a strong constitutive E.coli promoter (J23104) and RBS (0034) in front of the operon. We have succeeded with the swap and built the new biobrick [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149052 BBa_K1149052] which we refer to as constitutive phaCAB. In parallel, we have also assembled a different configuration of transcription initiation region: the "hybrid". Surprisingly, our results show that our "hybrid" phaCAB construct [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051 BBa_K1149051] significantly increased bioplastic production compared to native pha CAB. Please read on to discover more. </p>

We tested the promoter and RBS by cloning them in front of amilCP blue chromoprotein gene ([http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149020 BBa_K1149020]). As you can see from the plate below, this expresses a bright blue protein, which became an intrinsic part of our BioNouveau palette.

In order to change the promoter, we designed a forward primer that binds to the beginning of the first gene in the operon and contains a Xba restriction site: Pha_Fw (cgcttctagagatggctactgggaaaggagccg). We used pha_Fw and the suffix primer G1005 primer pain to amplify the insert out of the backbone. The new promoter and RBS were J23104 and B0034 from the biobrick [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K608002 BBa_K608002] We digested the pSB1C3 backbone with this biobrick with SpeI and PstI.

Summary diagram of construction steps:

We performed DpnI digest on the gel purified PCR product (insert) in order to get rid of any contamination from the original plasmid. We did Alkaline Phosphatase treatment of the backbone to remove terminal phosphates in order to decrease self-ligation of plasmid. We transformed the ligation into NEB5 cells and we grew overnight cultures from single cell colonies. The next day, we purified the plasmids and digested 200 ng of them with Xba and PstI to screen for the right clones:

Colony #8 had the expected 4.2kB insert and therefore we sent this plasmid for sequencing. After having the sequenced it, we submitted the new part to registry as [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051 BBa_K1149051]. This construct has double P+RBS since the native P+RBS stayed there in between the new P+RBS and the operon. We have identified a clone (from colony #6) that contains the new constitutive promoter only and submitted it as [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149052 BBa_K1149052] biobrick. We are testing both the hybrid and normal constitutive constructs for PHB bioplastic production.

Partial sequence of the constitutive phaCAB construct ([http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149052 BBa_K1149052]):

Partial sequence of the hybrid phaCAB construct ([http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051 BBa_K1149051]):

Our chassis (MG1655) survives in mixed waste ▼

These assays were designed to test whether our chassis, E.coli (MG1655) could grow directly with waste over a long period of time.

Waste media

LB-waste assay(A) Waste media (B) E.coli containing mCherry stress biosensor (BBa_K639003) were grown in mixed waste (A) over 3 days, then streaked in a qualitative assay to check for growth. (C) mCherry stress biosensor (BBa_K639003) transformed E.coli were streaked again after 7 days growth in SRF. Figure made by Imperial College London 2013 iGEM.	PBS-waste assay(A) waste media made up in PBS (phosphate buffered saline). (B) E. coli expressing mCherry stress biosensor (BBa_K639003) grown in waste media (A) over 3 days, then streaked onto an antibiotic containing plate to qualitatively assess whether the E.coli had survived. (C) Streaked again after 6 days growth in SRF. Figure made by Imperial College London 2013 iGEM.

Conclusion: MG1655 E.coli are viable and grow on mixed waste alone. Therefore we have established that our chassis could survive in a mixed waste bio-reactor context, which is validation of our concept to industrially implement our system.

Waste conditioned media

These assays were designed to test whether our chassis, E.coli MG1655 strain could grow with waste conditioned media (WCM) over a period of 24-48 hours. Waste conditioned media is a filter sterilised version of the waste media and was designed for several reasons; Firstly we were unsure whether mixed waste would be toxic to E.coli and hence a less concentrated version may be more suitable and secondly large chunks of waste would prevent accurate OD600 measurements and therefore we decided to filter out the largest chunks.

Photograph of waste conditioned media cultures mCherry stress biosensor (BBa_K639003) transformed MG1655 were grown with LB-WCM at 37ºC, with shaking for 48 hours. Figure made by Imperial College London 2013 iGEM.
Growth assay in waste conditioned media (WCM).E.coli MG1655 strain transformed with [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K639003 mCherry stress biosensor.] were grown with LB-based waste conditioned media at 37ºC, with shaking. Error bars represent S.E.M., n=4. Figure made by Imperial College London 2013 iGEM.	Growth assay in waste conditioned media (WCM). E.coli MG1655 strain transformed with either empty vector control (EV) or mCherry stress biosensor (BBa_K639003) were grown in WCM for 5 hours, with shaking at 37ºC. Error bars are SEM, n=4. Figure made by Imperial College London 2013 iGEM.

Conclusion: MG1655 transformed with either empty vector (EV) control or mCherry stress biosensor (BBa_K639003) vector are viable and can grow in waste conditioned media. Therefore waste conditioned media is an appropriate and novel experimental media with which to characterise biobricks within a mixed waste/landfill context. These data are also characterisation of an existing biobrick (BBa_K639003)

Mixed waste degradation: Polyurethane (PUR) ▼

PUR Esterase enzyme activity

Cell lysate assay

Since the PUR Esterases were not secreted, initially the cells were lysed to obtain crude cell extracts in order to test whether the enzymes are active. The Western Blot results showed that the constructs EstCS2 [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149002 BBa_K1149002], PueB [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149004 BBa_K1149004] and PulA [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149006 BBa_K1149006] were being expressed. The cultures expressing these three constructs were grown, lysed by sonication and utilised in a colourimetric assay with the substrate analog para-Nitrophenyl butyrate. The data shows that PUR Esterase EstCS2 [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149002 BBa_K1149002] is definitely active.

para-Nitrophenyl butyrate (p-NP) is commonly used to indicate an enzyme’s esterase activity. The enzyme cleaves the ester bond and releases the 4-nitrophenol (4-NP), thus causing a colour change from colourless to yellow and an increased absorbance at wavelength 405 nm.

para-Nitrophenyl butyrate is cleaved by Esterases to release 4-Nitrophenol. This is accompanied by an increase in absorbance at 405 nm. Figure adapted from TU Darmstadt 2012 iGEM

The assay was run in the [http://www.eppendorf.com/int/index.php?sitemap=2.1&action=products&contentid=1&catalognode=87236 Eppendorf BioSpectrometer] was used to automatically read the absorbance of the reaction mixture every 30 seconds. The concentration of 4-Nitrophenol produced from the reaction was calculated using the Beer-Lambert Law; the extinction coefficient of 4-NP is 18,000 M-1 cm-1 at 405 nm.

The results below show the concentration of 4-NP produced by the three different PUR esterases and compare them to the Empty Vector and Substrate alone as negative controls.

The increase in absorbance that accompanies the cleavage of para-Nitrophenyl butyrate by PUR Esterase EstCS2. Figure by Imperial College London iGEM 2013

The concentration of 4-Nitrophenol released by PUR Esterase EstCS2 activity. Empty Vector and Substrate alone were used as negative controls. Figure by Imperial College London iGEM 2013

The above graphs clearly show that PUR Esterase EstCS2 is active and cleaving p-NP. The recorded concentrations of 4-NP, in the presence of this PUR Esterase, are much greater than with the Empty Vector or the Substrate alone. Is PUR Esterase EstCS2 active? Yes!

The enzyme activity of PUR Esterase PueB. The graph shows the concentration of the 4-Nitrophenol released during 10 minutes incubation of para-Nitrophenyl butyrate with PueB and Empty Vector, as well as the p-NP substrate by itself. Figure made by Imperial College London 2013 iGEM

The enzyme activity of PUR Esterase PulA. The graph shows the concentration of the 4-Nitrophenol released during 10 minutes incubation of para-Nitrophenyl butyrate with PulA and Empty Vector, as well as the p-NP substrate by itself.Figure made by imperial College London 2013 iGEM

The enzymes expressed by both PueB and PulA do not appear to have esterase activity for this substrate. There is a tiny increase in 4-NP concentration for PueB, PulA, Empty Vector and Substrate alone. This probably indicates that the substrate is slowly degrading by itself. Other constituents of the cell lysates are likely to be causing a slight increase in p-NP degradation, as PueB, PulA and Empty Vector show higher concentrations of 4-NP than the Substrate alone.

Conclusion: PUR Esterase EstCS2 is active!

Mixed waste degradation: Toxicity ▼

Ethylene glycol

Ethylene glycol in LB with Stress Response cells. MG1655 were grown in ethylene glycol, a byproduct of polyurethane degradation. Cells were grown in 0mM, 100mM or 200mM Ethylene Glycol. At 37°C, the concentrations of ethylene glycol used do not affect growth, however at 30°C, the increasing concentration results in halved growth. A two-tailed t-test addressing the null hypothesis, temperature does not affect growth with ethylene glycol shows that the null hypothesis must be rejected as p = 0.001. Data points show final time point after 6h growth for each concentration. Growth was at 37°C and 30°C with shaking over 6h. Error bars are SEM, n=4. Figure made by Imperial College London 2013 iGEM.

Reduced growth at 30°C likely due to decreased efficiency of MG1655 ethylene glycol break down enzymes. These enzymes (see UC Davis 2012) are endogenously expressed and detoxify Ethylene Glycol.

Bioplastic production ▼

E.coli MG1655 containing the PhaCAB construct Part:BBa_K934001[http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K934001] accumulates the bioplastic P3HB inside its cells. P3HB can be visualised through staining with Nile Red, which fluoresces strongly in a hydrophobic environment, such as when it binds to the P3HB. However staining will be much lower in cells where P3HB is not present. To see whether P3HB was being produced we grew E.coli containing the phaCAB operon under the native promoter from Ralstonia eutropha. This produced the results we hoped for as seen in the image below.

The P3HB production model indicated that upregulating atoB would lead to an increase in bioplastic production. We changed the promoter before the phaCAB operon to the strong promoter J23104 and a hybrid promoter we created.

The Nile Red plates also provide a preliminary way in which to investigate the effect of changing the promoter to a stronger version. The darker staining of the streaks of the constitutive and hybrid promoter containing constructs suggests the production of higher levels of P3HB in these strains.

E.coli transformed with the phaCAB operon(native, hybrid and constitutive are different promoters expressing the operon) fluoresce when grown on LB-Agar plates with Nile Red stain. The P3HB produced within them is stained. Those without the operon do not(EV- transformed with empty pSB1C3). When the promoter is changed from the native form to the hybrid or constitutive J23104 then the fluorescence is more intense, indicating increased P3HB production.

We imaged the cells using the fluorescent microscope to qualitatively understand how much P3HB is produced per cell. As indicated by other authors(1), we saw that P3HB is found in localised granules within the bacteria. Empty vector containing cells show little fluorescence. In those that do, the staining is qualitatively different than in the phaCAB containing strains. Nile Red is also used as a lipid stain and this is indicated by its staining of the membranes of EV cells. In contrast, in phaCAB containing cells, staining is restricted to points within the cells.

Each fluorescent image was created by exciting the stain at 530nm for 100ms. Despite this standard treatment of samples the intensity of fluorescence produced by the cells containing the hybrid promoter is greater than from the constitutive ones. This could indicate a difference in the strength of the promoters which lead to phaCAB expression and therefore the amount of P3HB produced. The images also suggest that not every single E.coli is stained. This may be due to the conditions in which the cells were grown or may be dependent upon the stage in the lifecycle of the E.coli.

Fluorescent microscope images of E.coli stained with Nile Red. 1 -Empty vector, 2 - constitutive promoter phaCAB, 3 - hybrid promoter phaCAB. Images labelled a are fluorescent images excited at 530nm ovelaid on the bright field images shown in the b set of images. Images by Imperial College iGEM Team

We extracted the P3HB using a simple technique which maintains the chain length of the P3HB while releasing it from the cells. The amount of plastic extracted from the hybrid promoter-phaCAB(BBa_K1149051[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051]) was much larger compared to the native promoter-phaCAB. All other conditions were kept the same.

A comparison between the amount of plastic produced by bacteria containing an empty plasmid(EV), native promoter-phaCAB and hybrid promoter-phaCAB after plastic extraction. The EV does not produce P3HB while the hybrid produces much more than the native promoter.

Increasing Bioplastic Production ▼

We converted the data into the format with which industry compares P3HB production. These are mass of plastic per dry biomass and mass of plastic per litre of culture media. The strain containing the hybrid promoter had a ten fold higher ratio of plastic to biomass than that produced by the original part BBa_K934001

A summary of the improved production of P3HB by our hybrid promoter-phaCAB construct(BBa_K1149051) over the native promoter-phaCAB.

Comparing the amount of plastic produced by the two constructs is visually striking.

Comparison of P3HB production (left) 1.5ml tube, 90mg produced by native promoter-phaCAB (BBa_K934001), (right) 5ml tube, hybrid promoter-phaCAB produced 2.05g P3HB, (BBa_K1149051).

Bioplastic from mixed waste ▼

P(3HB) From Mixed Waste

E. coli (MG1655) transformed with native phaCAB (BBa_K934001) were grown with 600ml waste media (12g mixed waste in 600ml M9M- Minimal Media) overnight (16h) at 37oC with shaking. Prior to centrifugation large mixed waste chunks were filtered out. P(HB) was purified as described in Protocols.

P(3HB) purification: The diagram summaries the process of P(3HB) purification from E. coli (MG1655) transformed with native phaCAB (BBa_K934001)

See here a video of the process.

3HB Assay: Confirming production of 3HB

We have adapted a medical kit for 3HB detection for chemically analysing our samples. This provided a simple but accurate mean to measure the 3HB liberated from the polymer after phaZ1 depolymerase enzyme treatment. The monomer 3HB indicated the presence of P(3HB) in the material we purified from cells grown on waste as a sole carbon source. Please see the protocol here and our data and calculations here.

The chemical analysis of the produced bioplastic. The samples break break down to 3HB monomers after treatment with our PhaZ1 enzyme (BBa_K1149010). We synthesised P(3HB) using our improved Biobrick part (hybrid promoter phaCAB, BBa_K1149051). Our engineered bioplastic producing E.coli synthesised P(3HB) directly from waste. (Imperial iGEM data here.)

The bioplastic produced by our bacteria contains PHB and can be broken down into monomers by PhaZ1 enzyme (expressed by our bacteria)Imperial iGEM data.

We repeated the previously described experiment with E.coli cells containing all three P(3HB) production operons, grown on waste media. We also also tested the material left after the extraction protocol from cells containing the Empty vector only, grown on waste media. The yellow colour indicates presence of 3HB.

Production of PHB from waste confirmed. Imperial iGEM data.

Extras ▼

Growth assays with different experimental media

In additional to standard LB and minimal media, several novel experimental media were developed in order to characterise Biobricks within a mixed waste/landfill setting. These media were characterised through an examination of pH and through an array of growth assays with the project chassis, E.coli MG1655 strain.

Media characterisation. E.coli strain MG1655 were transformed with a control plasmid and grown in different experimental media over a period of 5 hours. LB media, minimal media (M9M), supplemented minimal media (M9S), as described here or waste conditioned media (WCM), which is made from sterile filtrated mixed waste, see here. OD600 measured, error bars are S.E.M., n=4. Figure made by Imperial College London 2013 iGEM.	pH of experimental media. pH measurements of experimental media were made both before and after several experiments. The time periods refer to the duration MG1655 transformed E.coliwere cultured in the media before a pH measurement was made. Figure made by Imperial College London 2013 iGEM.

Conclusion: E.coli strain are viable and grow in all of our experimental medias. We have established a novel media that is optimised for characterisation of biobricks within a mixed waste/landfill context.

Protocols ▼

Waste Conditioned Media (WCM)

We added 1g [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refuse-derived_fuel SRF] (Solid Recovered Fuel) /50 mL LB and then autoclaved the mixture. Once autoclaved, large waste chunks were removed through filter sterilisation (0.2 µm filters) before being used in growth assays as waste conditioned media (WCM). SRF refers to the refuse from recycling facilities that has no value currently and is incinerated to produce power at a cost to the recycling facility, it is composed of 30% plastics while the rest is cellulosic waste

See here how we make up waste conditioned media and purify plastic from it.

Waste Growth Assay

Overnight (O/N) cultures of MG1655 transformed with (BBa_K639003) were diluted to OD 0.05 in either fresh LB or waste conditioned media and plated into 96 well plates (200 µl/well). OD600 was read at the indicated time points and media only (LB) was taken away as background signal. In addition to this a qualitative assay as performed. 9 mL mCherry bacteria were transferred into 300 mL of autoclaved SRF in LB, which were placed in a shaking incubator at 37°C. After 2 days 200 µL of this solution was plated out on chloramphenicol plates, this was then repeated a week later to gauge whether or not the bacteria were still alive. To show that the MG1655 could grow on waste solely, they were grown in PBS (phosphate buffered saline) and autoclaved waste. In 100 mL PBS + waste, 1 mL MG1655 mCherry E.coli were added. They were then grown in a shaking incubator at 37°C and samples were plated after 2 days and 6 days.

MSDS ▼

Some of the reagents we used were slightly toxic to human. In order to reduce the risks of using toxic reagents, we always wear gloves and labcoats. For some toxic reagents, we performed in fume cupboard. Click on the reagents to see the MSDS.

1. [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=GB&language=en&productNumber=W222305&brand=ALDRICH&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Faldrich%2Fw222305%3Flang%3Den Tributyrin]

2. [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=GB&language=en&productNumber=458392&brand=ALDRICH&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Faldrich%2F458392%3Flang%3Den Poly(diethylene glycol adipate)].

3. [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=GB&language=en&productNumber=19123&brand=SIGMA&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Fsigma%2F19123%3Flang%3Den Nile red].

4. [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/PleaseWaitMSDSPage.do?language=&country=GB&brand=SIGMA&productNumber=A3256&PageToGoToURL=http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/sigma/a3256?lang=en&region=GB Arabinose].

5. [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=GB&language=en&productNumber=N9876&brand=SIGMA&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Fsigma%2Fn9876%3Flang%3Den 4-Nitrophenyl butyrate].

6. [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=GB&language=en&productNumber=270717&brand=ALDRICH&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Faldrich%2F270717%3Flang%3Den Acetonitrile].

7. [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=GB&language=en&productNumber=S8511&brand=SIGMA&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Fsigma%2Fs8511%3Flang%3Den N-Succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Leu p-nitroanilide].

8. [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=GB&language=en&productNumber=L3126&brand=SIGMA&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Fsigma%2Fl3126%3Flang%3Den Lipase from porcine pancreas].

Future work

We are changing the pelB secretion tag to OsmY-fusion partner for better secretion

As seen in the Western Blot results, some of the enzymes designed for secretion were not secreted. These proteins may have been stuck in the periplasmic space. Thus we are optimising enzyme secretion by building a new construct with OsmY [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K892008 BBa_K892008] fusion for secretion. OsmY is naturally secreted from E.coli and will carry our PUR esterase enzyme with. Once in the culture medium, we think that the enzyme is going to be functional in the fusion form but we included a TEV site in between the domains that can be cleaved by TEV protease if needed.

The linker sequence we have designed between the domains is T G S E N L Y F Q G S (ACCGGCAGCGAGAACCTGTACTTCCAAGGCAGC) and includes the 7 amino acids of the TEV site as well as 4 other amino acids for flexibility.

This construct will be a substitute for [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149002 BBa_K1149002] which is the PUR esterase EstCS2 with the pelB seretion tag.

UPDATE 28-10-13:

Whilst further optimisation is required a western blot analysis of our new construct OsmY-ESTC2 indicated that our enzyme maybe secreting into the supernatant.

We will test our Hybrid phaCAB within a bioreactor setup

We will inoculate a 15L bioreactor at Imperial College London to perform a pilot scale test of our plastic producing system.

Our Sponsors

125px

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{:Team:Imperial_College/Templates:header}}
 __NOTOC__
-         <h1>Module 1: Resourceful Waste</h1>
+         <h1>Module 1: Resource-full Waste</h1>
-[[File:Module_1_summary.jpg|800px|center]]
+[[File:Mod1diagram.png|thumbnail|800px|center]]
-<br>
 <b>Non-recyclable waste is sourced from a recycling centre, placed in a bioreactor with our M.A.P.L.E system which degrades the waste and synthesises the bioplastic P(3HB). Click the tabs to find out more</b>
@@ Line 23: / Line 22: @@
      <div class="TabbedPanelsContent">
-<br><br>
+<br>
+<p>Waste from recovery facilities is a mixture of plastics and cellulosic rich biomass such as fibres and wood. The Resource-full waste module utilises the large variety of materials organisms can naturally degrade to recycle the waste and to provide food for the production of the bioplastic poly-3-hydroxybutyrate, P(3HB).  </p>
+<h4>Separating polyurethane and selling its breakdown products</h4>
-<p>Mixed waste is one of the major challenges facing waste management as the materials cannot be recovered by recycling processes dedicated to individual materials. As a result the resources in the many products made of mixed materials and others that are mixed during disposal are not properly utilised. We wanted to create a way to recover these materials and produce something useful and valuable from them. We have designed this module to leverage the ability for organisms to work together to carry out complex tasks; in this case breaking down a common mixed waste to release the valuable platform chemical ethylene glycol and turn the remaining material into the bioplastic poly-3-hydroxybutyrate. </p>
+<p>Certain enzymes have the ability to degrade plastics as a result of their evolutionary history, dealing with tough and highly variable substrates such as lignin. Various enzymes have been biobricked to deal with most of the major petrochemical plastics, except for polyurethane. Polyurethane is one of the plastic constituents of this mixed waste. We have designed biobricks containing naturally occurring polyurethane esterases (also known as PUR esterases) to break polyurethane down into its constituent chemicals of ethylene glycol and poly(isocyanate). These valuable chemicals will be separated using specialised filters and sold back to industry.<p>
-<p>The mixed waste we have chosen is produced in recycling centres as a byproduct of the separation of valuable items from commercial and industrial waste. It is currently disposed of by incineration, causing harm to the environment and human health. It also wastes the resources present, many of which are non-renewable. We are upcycling this waste into new commodities.</p>
-<p>To do this we will break down the petrochemical polyurethane to recoup the valuable and finite feedstocks which produced it. We have chosen to break down polyurethane as we want to expand the range of major petrochemical plastics that can be broken down by the parts registry so that novel functions which require these abilities can be pursued with biobricks.</p>
+<h4>Using the residual material as a substrate for P(3HB) production</h4>
-<p>In order to do this we will secrete polyurethane degrading enzymes, often called PUR esterases, which have the ability to break polyurethane down. These genes are found naturally in organisms which must degrade tough substrates, particularly lignin. This makes them useful in breaking down plastics as these too are resistant polymers. We have tested five of these PUR esterases to find the most effective. The product of polyurethane breakdown, ethylene glycol is toxic and we have modeled the maximum rate of degradation which will still allow <i>E.coli</i> MG1655 to survive and continue to produce esterases. This is significant for whether this technique could be used to produce industrially relevant levels. Our bacteria have expressed an active PUR esterase, EstCS2 and we are working on having it secreted.</p>
+<p>The remaining organic portion of the mixed waste is used as a carbon source for P(3HB) production. P(3HB) is produced by organisms containing the pha CAB operon, originally found in soil bacteria such as <I>Ralstonia eutropha</I>. The operon contains three genes which are members of the pathway required to make P(3HB). P(3HB) is used as a storage molecule in the organisms which produce it. They do this when nutrients are limiting but when there is a plentiful carbon source.</p>
-<p>After the oil derived plastics are removed from the mixed waste there is energy rich organic matter left over. This is what the bacteria will feed on to produce the bioplastic P3HB. P3HB is produced inside the cells of bacteria containing the phaCAB operon which is found in <I>Ralstonia eutropha</I> and other soil living bacteria. The ability of some bacteria to produce poly hydroxyalkanoates (the family of polyesters of which P3HB is a member) has been known since the 1920's. P3HB is produced industrially inside bacteria grown with sucrose and other sugars from crops such as corn. Life cycle analyses of P3HB indicate it has superior environmental qualities compared to petrochemical plastics(1,2). Using the organic component in waste from mixed recycling facilities has been theoretically analysed and indicates an energy and carbon cost half that of producing P3HB from biomass(3)</p>
+<p>P(3HB) is produced commercially by several companies. One of the crucial factors in whether production is economical or not is  the efficiency of bioplastic production. We have hugely increased the efficiency of P(3HB) production; an important step in making our system feasible.</p>
+<p>To scale up the production of P(3HB), our system would require large amounts of purified sugars. We would, therefore, hydrolyse the long polysaccharide components to release the sugars. This is a current industrial pre-treatment technique to allow the fermentation of ligno-cellulosic biomass.</p>
+</html>
+[[File:Overviewdiagram.png|800px|center]]
+<html>
-<p>We transformed <I>E.coli</I> with phaCAB and produced P3HB when grown on mixed waste. P3HB is currently expensive in comparison to oil derive plastics with the choice of substrate having a large impact upon the cost. Another important factor is the yield of P3HB which can be produced with higher yields making the process more economically feasible. The model we produced suggested we could increase the level of P3HB by upregulating the limiting enzyme within the operon, phaB. We then implemented this in the lab by placing testing the operon with two strong constitutive promoters; one of our own design and also J23104 from the registry. This resulted in a ten fold increase in P3HB production when compared with the native operon and has vastly improved the part. We then used this data to improve the accuracy of model. This also allowed us to compare the amount of P3HB production to that currently produced industrially.</p>
-<p>E.coli grow well on the mixed waste without any additional carbon source and produced P3HB while growing on it. We confirmed the identity of the P3HB we produced by incubating the material we produced with Phaz1, the extracellular P3HB depolymerase expressed in the next module. 3-HB was detected as the product of this with a 3-HB detection kit. </p>
 <br><br><br>
@@ Line 48: / Line 53: @@
              <li>Kendall A. A life cycle assessment of biopolymer production from material recovery facility residuals. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 61 (2012) 69– 74 </li>
 conomou A. Following the leader: bacterial protein export through the Sec pathway. Trends in microbiology 1999;7(8) 315-320.
+<li>Chul-Hyung Kang, Ki-Hoon Oh, Mi-Hwa Lee, Tae-Kwang Oh, Bong Hee Kim, Jung- Hoon Yoon.<cite> A novel family VII esterase with industrial potential from compost metagenomic library</cite>Microbial Cell Factories 2011, 10:41 doi:10.1186/1475-2859-10-41</li>
+<li>Da Almeida, Alejandra. <cite>Effect of the granule associated protein phasin (PhaP) on cell growth and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) accumulation from glycerol in bioreactor cultures of recombinant E. coli.</cite> Volume 131, Issue 2, Supplement, September 2007, Pages S167.</li>
 </ol>
@@ Line 54: / Line 61: @@
 <h2 id="specification">Specification</h2>
-         <p><b>1. The bacteria should survive and grow in mixed waste</b></p>
+         <p><b>1. Our bacteria should survive and grow in mixed waste</b></p>
             <p>In order for the bacteria to produce bioplastic from the mixed waste they first need to be able to use
                it as a carbon source</p>
-         <p><b>2. The bacteria should secrete a functional polyurethane esterase</b></p>
+         <p><b>2. Our bacteria should secrete a functional polyurethane esterase</b></p>
                <p>To recover the resources from polyurethane in the mixed waste, the enzymes should secrete in an active form.</p>
-         <p><b>3. Our Bacteria should be able to tolerate mixed waste degradation products, such as Ethylene Glycol</b></p>
+         <p><b>3. Our bacteria should be able to tolerate mixed waste degradation products, such as ethylene glycol</b></p>
-         <p>The products of Polyurethane degradation are toxic and so any bacteria growing with them must be able to survive to a concentration which will allow economical production of ethylene glycol. We have chosen a strain of <i>E.coli</i>-MG1655, which is resistant to ethylene glycol toxicity.</p>
+         <p>The products of polyurethane degradation are toxic and so any bacteria growing with them must be able to survive to a concentration which will allow economical production of ethylene glycol. We have chosen a strain of <i>E.coli</i>-MG1655, which is resistant to ethylene glycol toxicity.</p>
-         <p><b>4. The bacteria should produce P3HB</b></p>
+         <p><b>4. Our bacteria should produce P(3HB)</b></p>
-         <p><b>5. The bacteria should produce P3HB from the mixed waste</b></p>
+         <p><b>5. Our bacteria should produce P(3HB) from the mixed waste</b></p>
 </div>
      <div class="TabbedPanelsContent">
-<h2 id="design">Design<font size="4"> [Click on the tabs below to expand]</font size="4"></h2>
 <div id="CollapsiblePaneldesign1" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h3>PUR Degradation: Pathway</h3></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>PUR Degradation: Pathway      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
@@ Line 78: / Line 83: @@
 <img style="float: right;" IMG SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/6/6c/Module1_3-13.jpg" ALT="testing" WIDTH=450 HEIGHT=450 POSITION=INLINE>
-<p>It is known from previous research that some lignin degrading microbial enzymes to be so tough that they can even deal with more difficult polymers: plastics. Some previous iGEM teams have exploited this and worked on enzymatic degradation of various kinds of plastic. We would like to build on this  work and extend the plastic degradation capabilities of the synthetic biology community by improving PUR degradation in particular as this has not been successfully achieved before. We have identified 5 PUR-esterase enzymes from the literature that are capable of catalyzing the below reaction. </p>
+<p>Lignin degrading microbial enzymes are capable of degrading plastics. Some previous iGEM teams have exploited this ability. We have built on their work and extended the plastic degradation capabilities of the synthetic biology community by improving polyurethane (PUR) degradation, as this has not been successfully achieved before. We have identified 5 PUR-esterase enzymes from the literature that are capable of catalyzing the below reaction.</p>
 <IMG SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/9/9e/Pur_degradation.JPG" ALT="PUR molecular degradation" WIDTH=450 HEIGHT=450>
 <br>
+We have synthesised all of the genes in the below table and are testing them for expression in <i>E.coli</i>, secretion, activity and PUR degradation capabilities. Our ultimate design is to be able to control the relative levels of different enzymes in a waste-degrading bio-reactor, in order to adjust it to the composition of waste. We have, therefore, designed the expression constructs accordingly. Our models predict the degradation rate of polyurethane at the bioreactor scale.
-We have synthesised all of the genes in the below table and are testing them for expression in <i>E.coli</i>, secretion, activity and PUR degradetion capabilities. Our ultimate design is to be able to control the relative levels of different enzymes in waste degrading bio-reactor in order to adjust it to the composition of waste. Therefore we designed the expression constructs accordingly. Our models predict the degradation rate of PUR at the bioreactor scale.
+.
@@ Line 92: / Line 97: @@
 <div id="CollapsiblePaneldesign2" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h3>PUR Degradation: BioBrick Designs</h3></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>PUR Degradation: BioBrick Designs      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
@@ Line 136: / Line 141: @@
 </table>
-<IMG SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/7/76/PUR_biobricks_ICL.JPG" ALT="testing" WIDTH=500 HEIGHT=500>
+<IMG SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/8/86/PUR_biobricks_new.JPG" ALT="testing" WIDTH=400 HEIGHT=400>
+</html>
+<p><b>Secretion Strategy:</b> </p>
+<p align="justify"><i>E.coli</i> is commonly used as a chassis in innovative iGEM projects that aim to prove a concept and make the case for a novel function in a biologically engineered machine.  In our case, we aim to degrade and synthesise plastic and the degradation part of our system needs to be extracellular. There are many strategies for secretion. You can read about these on our [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/SecretionHelp Secretion Guide page] and find the corresponding biobricks and projects. If you are currently in the process of designing a Genetically Engineered Machine in E.coli, this page provides a good starting point to look for information.</p>
+<p align="justify">We chose the pelB secretion tag as it has been demonstrated to work in many cases, sometimes with very high transport efficiency (1)(2). pelB has been used in iGEM projects for many years and is part of 50+ constructs. The UC-Davis team last year used it to secrete LC-Cutinase, a PET plastic degrading enzyme [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K936013 (BBa_K936013)] successfully, which is somewhat similar to our plastic-degrading enzymes.</p>
+<html>
+<p><b>Safety:</b> </p>
+<p>We considered the safety aspects of using the PudA enzyme, since its sequences were originally from a Risk Group 2 (RG2) organism. We submitted our safety information to iGEM for review. <b>Safety forms were approved on October 2nd, 2013 by the iGEM Safety Committee.</b> We did not use the organism only the part itself and the final sequences were codon optimised for expression in E. coli, which included the elimination of the forbidden restriction sites.</p>
+<p>References</p>
+<ol class="reference">
+        <li>Thanassi DG, Hultgren SJ. Multiple pathways allow protein secretion across the bacterial outer membrane. Current opinion in cell biology 2000;12(4) 420-430.</li>
+    <li>Sletta H, Tondervik A, Hakvag S, Aune TEV, Nedal A, Aune R, et al. The presence of N-terminal secretion signal sequences leads to strong stimulation of the total expression levels of three tested medically important proteins during high-cell-density cultivations of <i>E.coli</i>. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2007;73(3) 906-912.</li>
 </div>
@@ Line 143: / Line 163: @@
 <div id="CollapsiblePaneldesign3" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h3>Bioplastic Synthesis: Pathway</h3></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>Bioplastic Synthesis: Pathway      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
-<p align="justify">Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate(P3HB) is a bioplastic which is naturally produced inside bacteria such as Ralstonia eutropha, where it accumulates as globules inside the cell. In its native bacteria it is produced as an energy store(1) but it is as a plastic that it interests researchers and industrialists. </p>
+<p align="justify">Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate P(3HB) is a polyester which is naturally produced inside bacteria such as  <i>Ralstonia eutropha</i>, where it accumulates as granules inside the cell. In its native bacteria it is produced as an energy store (1).It's properties as a plastic has gained it the attention of researchers and industrialists. In our system, the bacteria will take up organic molecules from waste and use them for P(3HB) production. </p>
-        <p align="justify">	We have made P3HB in <i>E.coli</i>, transferring three genes, naturally found in Ralstonia eutropha into <i>E.coli</i> MG1655. These encode the three enzymes necessary for P3HB production; polyhydroxyalkanoate synthase(phaC), 3-ketothiolase(phaA) and acetoacetyl coenzyme A reductase(phaB). These are encoded by the phaCAB operon. We have altered the expression of these three genes to maximise the production of P3HB as high yields are required for it to be economically viable.</p>
-<IMG SRC="http://www.igem.org/wiki/images/f/f3/Reaction_phaC.jpg" ALT="testing" WIDTH=800 HEIGHT=800>
+<IMG SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/2/25/Module2555.png" ALT="testing" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=600>
+        <p align="justify">We have made P(3HB) in <i>E.coli</i>, transferring three genes naturally found in  <i>Ralstonia eutropha</i> into <i>E.coli</i> MG1655. These encode the three enzymes necessary for P(3HB) production; polyhydroxyalkanoate synthase(phaC), 3-ketothiolase(phaA) and acetoacetyl coenzyme A reductase(phaB). These are encoded by the pha CAB operon. We have altered the expression of these three genes to maximise the production of P(3HB) as high yields are required for it to be economically viable.</</p>
+<p><b>3-ketothiolase:</b></p>
+<IMG SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/7/75/PhaA_reaction_diagram.jpg" ALT="testing" WIDTH=1000 HEIGHT=1000>
+<p><b>Acetoacetyl coenzyme A reductase:</b></p>
+<IMG SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/9/9c/PhaB_reaction_diagram.jpg" ALT="testing" WIDTH=1000 HEIGHT=1000>
+<p><b>Polyhydroxyalkanoate synthase:</b></p>
+<IMG SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/df/PhaC_reaction_diagram.jpg" ALT="testing" WIDTH=1000 HEIGHT=1000>
 </div>
@@ Line 158: / Line 188: @@
 <div id="CollapsiblePaneldesign4" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h3> Bioplastic Synthesis: Biobrick designs</h3></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4> Bioplastic Synthesis: Biobrick Designs      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
-<p> We will first use the phaCAB biobrick [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K934001 BBa_K934001] to produce P3HB. Our aim is the industrial production of P3HB and this require high yields to be economically viable. The results from the metabolic model suggest that  to do this the amount of phaB should be increased. To do this we designed constructs with stronger promoters to upregulate the expression of the operon. </p>
+<p>We used the pha CAB biobrick [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K934001 BBa_K934001] to produce P(3HB) which contains the native operon of <i>Ralstonia eutropha</i>. Inthe future we would like to see our system implemented at an industrial scale. This requires high yields to be economically viable. We created P(3HB) synthesis models to inform our experimental attempts to increase P(3HB) yield. We were especially interested to find out if up or down-regulation of any of the enzymes involved in the biosynthetic pathway could increase yields. To analyse this, we needed to know the reactions in the metabolic pathway and also the relative parameters of the enzymes and their dynamic relationships in order to identify bottlenecks in the flux of metabolites. The results from the metabolic model suggest that the amount of pha B is especially critical and increasing its level should give us more P(3HB). (Please see our modelling section for details.) To do this, we designed constructs with stronger promoters to up-regulate the expression of the operon. </p>
-<p>The operon was originally under the native promoter from Ralstonia eutropha. However our modelling predicted that we could increase P(3HB) production and so we designed two promoters to increase transcription. The first uses the constitutive promoter [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23104 J23104]. The second was designed as a hybrid promoter incorporating BBa_J23104 and the original promoter due to recent results of high expression from a hybrid promoter[http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0056321]. </p>
+<p>We designed and constructed two new constructs for increased expression of the operon (including pha B). The first construct uses the constitutive promoter [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23104 J23104] and the [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0034 RBS 0034] with a following scar site TACTAGAG in front of the ATG of the pha C gene. The second construct was designed as a hybrid promoter incorporating BBa_J23104 and the original promoter first, followed by the native promoter and RBS, due to recent results of high expression from a hybrid promoter[http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0056321]. The region containing the native  promoter and RBS is 352 nucleotides long and might contain important regulatory elements and therefore we were interested to test the hybrid construct in comparison to both the native and constitutive promoter configurations.</</p>
-https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/6/60/PhaCAB_all_kinfds_of_parts.jpg
+https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/6/60/PhaCAB_all_kinfds_of_parts.jpg
 <html>
@@ Line 176: / Line 206: @@
   <div id="CollapsiblePaneldesign5" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h3> Chassis Design: Tolerance to Waste </h3></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4> Chassis Design: Tolerance to Waste      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
-<p align="justify">We chose the MG1655 <i>E.coli</i> strain as chassis because it constitutively expresses genes that make it resistant to the potentially toxic molecule.
+<p align="justify">We chose the MG1655 <i>E.coli</i> strain as chassis because it constitutively expresses genes that make it resistant to toxic waste degradation products, such as Ethylene glycol.
-The [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K892010 AldA] and [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K892009 FucO] genes have an important role in decreasing the toxic effects of Ethylene-glycol by converting it into Glycolaldehyde which is a link to the cell`s central metabloism. We have received these genes from the registry and future work could be to express these in Bacillus or cellulose degrading organisms to make them tolerant as well. </p>
+The [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K892010 aldA] and [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K892009 fucO] genes have an important role in decreasing the toxic effects of ethylene glycol by converting it into glycolaldehyde which is a link to the cell`s central metabolism. We have received these genes from the registry and future work could be to express these in <i>Bacillus</i> or cellulose-degrading organisms to make them tolerant as well.
+</p>
+https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/8/8f/AldA_fucO_pathway.jpg
 <html>
 </div>
 </div>
 <div id="CollapsiblePaneldesign6" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h3>Enzyme Secretion Strategy </h3></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>Enzyme Secretion Strategy </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
-<p align="justify"><i>E.coli</i> is commonly used as a chassis in innovative iGEM project that aim to prove the concept and make the case for a novel function in a biologically engineered machine.  In our case, we aim to degrade and synthesise plastic and the degradation part of our system needs to be extracellular. There are not only such biotechnological but also many other reasons for the extracellular targeting of a protein:  It can be a product with a medical function, like the  [http://www.2009.igem.org/Team:METU-Gene/EGF_Transportation EGF hormone in a previous iGEM project]  or be important in bioremediation such as  in [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Project/Mop Dundee Team’s toximop system] and much more. There are many strategies for secretion. On the following page, you can read about these and find out why we chose the pelB tag for all our degradation enzymes and how we improved the ESTCS2 esterase by changing the phoA outer-membrane anchoring tag in the original Biobrick to pelB. Our story will help you to choose a secretion strategy best suited to your project and also give you guidance with the technical details of using it. </p>
-<h5>Alternative strategies for protein secretion in <i>E.coli</i>:</h5>
+<p align="justify"><i>E.coli</i> is commonly used as a chassis in innovative iGEM projects that aim to prove a concept and make the case for a novel function in a biologically engineered machine.  In our case, we aim to degrade and synthesise plastic and the degradation part of our system needs to be extracellular. There are many strategies for secretion. You can read about these on our [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/SecretionHelp Secretion Guide page] and find the corresponding biobricks and projects. If you are currently in the process of designing a Genetically Engineered Machine in E.coli, this page provides a good starting point to look for information.</p>
-<p align="justify"> <b>N terminal secretion-signal peptides</b> are recognised by the sec pathway .  The pathway transports to the periplasm and additional mechanism are usually necessary to further export the protein to the extracellular space. An approach for using this pathway is the addition of an N terminal signal peptide to the target protein which can obtain as high as 90% efficiency in secretion to the extracellular space. Such signals are pelB and phoA tags which are available as biobricks. PelB can get cleaved off by pelB peptidase in the periplasm but phoA will anchor your protein to this localisation. </p>
-<p>
-<b>Fusion partners</b> are endogenous proteins that naturally get secreted in <i>E.coli</i> and can be fused to the target protein. Some such proteins were demonstrated to be a powerful carriers of medically relevant human proteins in <i>E.coli</i>.  The yebF and ompF proteins exit the cell via the sec pathway and use additional mechanism for leaving the periplasm where they interact with outer-membrane porins for extracellular secretion. The osmY is available as a Biobrick and we have submitted ompF this year.  </p>
-<p><b>The porin proteins</b> such as ompF and ompA, can be used as fusion partners too and anchor proteins to the outer surface of <i>E.coli</i>. </p>
-<p><b>ABC transporters</b> use ATP for transport of specific proteins across the bacterial membrane.  The ABC transporter of Erwinia chrysanthemi  can be expressed in <i>E.coli</i> and export proteins that contain the LARD1 domain as a C terminal fusion. The system is biobricked in two separate plasmids (transporter, LARD1) with different antibiotic resistance and it is important to use both at the same time.</p>
-<br>
-The [http://parts.igem.org/Protein_domains/Localization page] in the registry that lists localisation tags]  is incomplete and contains eukaryotic and prokaryotic localisation signals mixed together. We have therefore put together the  tables below for you to help choose an <i>E.coli</i> secretion strategy that is suitable for your project.
-</p>
-<html>
+<p align="justify">We chose the pelB secretion tag as it has been demonstrated to work in many cases, sometimes with very high transport efficiency (3). pelB has been used in iGEM projects for many years and is part of 50+ constructs. The UC-Davis team last year used it to secrete LC-Cutinase, a PET plastic degrading enzyme [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K936013(BBa_K936013)] successfully, which is somewhat similar to our plastic-degrading enzymes.</p>
-<h4 class="clear"> Extracellular Secretion in <i>E.coli</i>:</h4>
+<p>References</p>
-<table border="2" bgcolor="#efefef">
+<ol class="reference">
-<tr>
+<li>Economou A. Following the leader: bacterial protein export through the Sec pathway. Trends in microbiology 1999;7(8) 315-320.</li>
- <th width="150"></th>
+<li>Thanassi DG, Hultgren SJ. Multiple pathways allow protein secretion across the bacterial outer membrane. Current opinion in cell biology 2000;12(4) 420-430.</li>
- <th>Description</th>
+<li>Sletta H, Tondervik A, Hakvag S, Aune TEV, Nedal A, Aune R, et al. The presence of N-terminal secretion signal sequences leads to strong stimulation of the total expression levels of three tested medically important proteins during high-cell-density cultivations of <i>E.coli</i>. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2007;73(3) 906-912.</li>
- <th>Biobrick</th>
- <th>Team</th>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <th>pelB</th>
- <td>type II secretion signal peptide, cleaved off in periplasm</td>
- <td>BBa_K208004 BBa_K1149022 BBa_K208004 BBa_J32015 </td>
- <td>lots eg. Imperial 2013 </td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <th>yebF</th>
- <td>large fusion-protein, Sec-pathway and additional mechanism</td>
- <td>BBa_K1149001 </td>
- <td>Imperial 2013 </td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <th>osmY</th>
- <td>large fusion-protein, Sec-pathway and additional mechanism</td>
- <td>BBa_K892008 </td>
- <td>Washington 2012 </td>
-</tr>
- <tr>
- <th>LARD 1</th>
- <td>Lipase ABC transporter recognition domain</td>
- <td>BBa_K258001 </td>
- <td>METU-GEne 2009 </td>
-</tr>
-</table>
-<h4 class="clear">Outer Membrane Anchors and Periplasmic Expression in <i>E.coli</i>:</h4>
-<table border="2" bgcolor="#efefef">
-<tr>
- <th width="150"></th>
- <th>Description</th>
- <th>Biobrick</th>
- <th>Team</th>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <th>ompF</th>
- <td>porin protein that can be fused to a protein, anchors to outer membrane</td>
- <td>BBa_K864204 </td>
- <td>Uppsala 2012 </td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <th>ompA</th>
- <td>porin protein that can be fused to a protein, anchors to outer membrane</td>
- <td>BBa_K103006 </td>
- <td>Wasraw 2008 </td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <th>INP</th>
- <td>short domain,anchors in periplasm</td>
- <td>BBa_K523013 (INP-YFP) BBa_K632002 (INP-Silicatein) </td>
- <td>Minnesota 2011 Edinburgh 2011</td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <th>torA</th>
- <td>anchors in periplasm</td>
- <td></td>
- <td>Dundee 2013 </td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <th>phoA</th>
- <td>tag for sec pathway, anchors to OM</td>
- <td>BBa_K808028 </td>
- <td>Darmstadt 2011 </td>
-</tr>
-</table>
-<br>
-<p align="justify">
-Our choice is to use the pelB secretion tag as it has been demonstrated to work in many cases with sometimes as high as 90% transport efficiency. The pelB has been used in iGEM project for many years and is part of 50+ constructs. The UC-Davis team last year used it to secrete LC-Cutinase, a PET plastic degrading enzyme ( BBa_K936013) successfully which is somewhat similar to our plastic degradation enzymes.</p>
-<p> Assembly methods and toolkit:</p>
-<p> An advantage of the pelB is that it is relatively short (only 66 BP) and we could get our gene synthesised with the tag. A problem with standard biobrick assembly is that the scar site contains a STOP codon and therefore </html>[http://parts.igem.org/Protein_domains alternative strategies are needed]<html>. One of the ways around this is to use Infusion/Gibson assembly which we also had a go with and you can find instructions under our protocols section.  We have constructed a biobrick where LARD1 is after a constitutive promoter and RBS in order to facilitate quicker cloning with less assembly steps, </html>[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149021 BBa_K1149021]. <html></p>
-<p>Unfortunately, the pelB tag did not prove to be the best strategy for secreting our degradation enzymes in the MG1655 strain. Therefore, we are changing the strategy to use osmY.</p>
-<p>References</p>
-<ol class="reference">
-    <li>Economou A. Following the leader: bacterial protein export through the Sec pathway. Trends in microbiology 1999;7(8) 315-320.</li>
-    <li>Thanassi DG, Hultgren SJ. Multiple pathways allow protein secretion across the bacterial outer membrane. Current opinion in cell biology 2000;12(4) 420-430.</li>
-    <li>Sletta H, Tondervik A, Hakvag S, Aune TEV, Nedal A, Aune R, et al. The presence of N-terminal secretion signal sequences leads to strong stimulation of the total expression levels of three tested medically important proteins during high-cell-density cultivations of <i>E.coli</i>. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2007;73(3) 906-912.</li>
-    <li>Qian Z, Xia X, Choi JH, Lee SY. Proteome-based identification of fusion partner for high-level extracellular production of recombinant proteins in <i>E.coli</i>. Biotechnology and bioengineering 2008;101(3) 587-601.</li>
-    <li>Prehna G, Zhang G, Gong X, Duszyk M, Okon M, McIntosh LP, et al. A Protein Export Pathway Involving Escherichia coil Porins. Structure 2012;20(7) 1154-1166.</li>
-    <li>Binet R, Letoffe S, Ghigo JM, Delepelaire P, Wandersman C. Protein secretion by Gram-negative bacterial ABC exporters - A review. Gene 1997;192(1) 7-11.</li>
-    <li>Chung CW, You J, Kim K, Moon Y, Kim H, Ahn JH. Export of recombinant proteins in <i>E.coli</i> using ABC transporter with an attached lipase ABC transporter recognition domain (LARD). Microbial Cell Factories 2009;8 11.</li>
-    <li>Francetic O, Pugsley AP. Towards the identification of type II secretion signals in a nonacylated variant of pullulanase from Klebsiella oxytoca. Journal of Bacteriology 2005;187(20) 7045-7055.</li>
-    <li>Fu LL, Xu ZR, Li WF, Shuai JB, Lu P, hu CXH. Protein secretion pathways in Bacillus subtilis: Implication for optimization of heterologous protein secretion. Biotechnology Advances 2007;25(1) 1-12.</li>
-    <li>Cho HY, Yukawa H, Inui M, Doi RH, Wong SL. Production of minicellulosomes from Clostridium cellulovorans in Bacillus subtilis WB800. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2004;70(9) 5704-5707.</li>
-    <li>Zhang XZ, Cui ZL, Hong Q, Li SP. High-level expression and secretion of methyl parathion hydrolase in Bacillus subtilis WB800. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2005;71(7) 4101-4103.</li>
 </ol>
 <html>
 </div>
 </div>
 <div id="CollapsiblePaneldesign7" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h3>Bioreactor Safety</h3></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>Safety      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
-<p align="justify">We have come up with a few strategies to prevent release of our bacteria into the environment. Firstly, the bioreactor containing bacteria will have a kill switch that kills bacteria if the bioreactor is opened when operating. We also lyse the cells at the end of reactions to harvest our product P3HB, ensuring that no living bacteria escape the bioreactors. </p>
+<p>Safety issues regarding our chassis can be found </html>[https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/MSDS here]<html>.</p>
 <html>
 </div>
 </div>
 </div>
+<div class="TabbedPanelsContent"><h2 id="Modelling">Modelling</h2>
+</html>
+<h4>What we learnt from the PUR degradation model:</h4>
+*The model assisted the design of enzyme assays, in particular:
+*The toxicity of the PUR degradation product, Ethylene glycol was taken into account in the modelling and it successfully determined the maximum tolerance of the system.
+*Ethylene glycol toxicity assays were carried out in the wet lab and were designed according to the results from our model.
-<div class="TabbedPanelsContent"><h2 id="Modelling">Modelling<font size="4"> [Click on the tabs below to expand]</font size="4"></h2>
+<h4>What we learnt from the P(3HB) synthesis model:</h4>
+* Scanning concentration of pha B and sensitivity analysis showed that increasing the concentration of pha B would increase the production rate of P(3HB) in our engineered 'E.coli'.
+* Simulations showed that the constitutive promoter J23104 could lead to a higher expression of pha B than the native promoter. As a result the Wet lab team designed and built  [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051 BBa_K1149051], which significantly increased bioplastic production.
+* Results from the metabolic model suggested that the synthesis of P(3HB) would be accompanied by a drop of ATP over time and hence allowed us to identify potential limitations of our engineered system. This is important for the [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/Industrial_Implementation Industrial Implementation of our system.]
+<html>
 <div id="CollapsiblePanelMod1" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h1>1.0 Polyurethane (PUR) Degradation Module</h1></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h3>1.0 Polyurethane (PUR) degradation model      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h1></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
-<h3>Introduction</h3>
+<h4>Introduction</h4>
 <p align="justify">
-Both efficiencies of Polyurethane (PUR) degradation and ethylene glycol production are important for the performance of <b>MAPLE</b> system. We built a mathematical and deterministic model that is based on MATLAB extension Simbiology for Polyurethane degradation. The model contains the kinetic property of degradation enzymes that is helpful for the design of assays. As we scaled up the initial concentrations of all substrates to meet the conditions for a bio-reactor, the model can provide preliminary simulations and predictions for the <b>MAPLE</b> system. </p>
+The efficiencies for polyurethane (PUR) degradation and ethylene glycol production are important for the performance of our system. We built a mathematical and deterministic model that is based on MATLAB extension Simbiology for polyurethane degradation. The model contains the kinetic properties of degradation enzymes that are helpful for the design of assays. As we scaled up the initial concentrations of all substrates to meet the conditions for a bio-reactor, the model can provide preliminary simulations and predictions for the <b>MAPLE</b> system. </p>
-<h2>Design</h2>
+<h4>Design</h4>
-<h3>Objective</h3>
+<h5>Objective</h5>
 <p>Here are some specific objectives for the model to achieve:</p>
 <p>1. The model should contain the gene expression model of the degradation enzymes because the enzyme concentration determines the rate of plastic degradation. In our case for PUR degradation, we used [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K206000 pBAD strong promoter K206000] for most enzymes. We built the gene expression model based on inducible pBAD promoter, which gene expression rate can be regulated by inducer concentration.</p>
 <p>2. The model should show the efficiency of the enzyme secretion to the culture from the cells. It's also important because the enzyme concentration in the culture depends on it. Here we used pelB secretion tag for most enzymes in order to achieve a high efficiency.</p>
-<p>3. The model basically predict how long will take to degrade a known concentration of soluble polyurethane. It is assumed that the enzyme in our assays has the same kinetic properties as the enzyme used in the literature. The model can suggest a suitable concentration of the plastic to use in order to get good results from the assays.   </p>
+<p>3. The model basically predicts how long will take to degrade a known concentration of soluble polyurethane. It is assumed that the enzyme in our assays has the same kinetic properties as the enzyme used in the literature. The model can suggest a suitable concentration of the plastic to use in order to get good results from the assays.   </p>
-<p>4. It is known that ethylene glycol is toxic to E.coli. However, it has no clear effect on the growth of our MG1655 strain when the concentration of ethylene glycol is below 200mM. Therefore, the model should suggest a safe range of PUR concentration to avoid a high concentration (>200mM) of ethylene glycol produced. </p>
+<p>4. It is known that ethylene glycol is toxic to <i>E.coli</i>. It has, however, no clear effect on the growth of our MG1655 strain when the concentration of ethylene glycol is below 200 mM. The model, therefore, should suggest a safe range of polyurethane concentration to avoid a high concentration (>200mM) of ethylene glycol produced. </p>
-<h3>The Model</h3>
+<h4>The Model</h4>
 <p align="justify">Polyurethane (PUR) degradation involves 5 different degradation enzymes:</p>
 <table border="2" bgcolor="#efefef">
@@ Line 375: / Line 325: @@
 </tr>
 </table>
-<p>However, 4 of the 5 enzymes are not well characterised before, so we could't find enough kinetic data from the literature. The only well-characterised PUR degradation enzyme PudA is used in the model as an illustration of all PUR degradation enzymes. The model will be more complete when the kinetic data of the other enzymes are defined. The finished PUR degradation model is shown as below: </p>
+<p>4 of the 5 enzymes are not well characterised before, so we could't find enough kinetic data from the literature. The only well-characterised PUR degradation enzyme PudA is used in the model as an illustration of all PUR degradation enzymes. The model will be more complete when the kinetic data of the other enzymes are defined. The finished PUR degradation model is shown as below: </p>
 [[File:PurModel.png]]
-<p><b>Key</b></p>
 <p>There are two compartments which represents cells and the culture from left to right. The "cell" compartment contains the gene expression module whereas the "culture" compartment contains the degradation module. The "secretion" block that connects two compartments is the secretion module. </p>
-<h3>Parameters and assumptions </h3>
+<h4>Parameters and assumptions </h4>
-<h4>Gene expression module of PudA</h4>
 <table border="2" bgcolor="#efefef">
         <tr>
@@ Line 387: / Line 336: @@
          <th>Value</th>
          <th>Units</th>
-         <th>Sources</th>
+         <th>Source</th>
-         <th>Assumptions</th>
+         <th>Assumptions/Notes</th>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <th>β</th>
          <td>maximum rate of transcription</td>
-         <td>0.032</td>
+         <td>0.015</td>
          <td>mM/min</td>
          <td>Please see derivation 1 below.</td>
@@ Line 410: / Line 359: @@
          <th>d<sub>mRNA</sub></th>
          <td>mRNA degradation rate</td>
-         <td>0.10</td>
+         <td>0.035</td>
          <td>1/min</td>
-        <td>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC420366/pdf/07X.pdf]</td>
+         <td>[http://jb.asm.org/content/189/23/8746.full]</td>
-         <td>Taking the value of mRNA half-life in E.coli strain MG1655 as 6.8min.  rate = ln2/half-life = ln2/6.8 = 0.10</td>
+         <td>There is no active degradation pathway and that dilution is the dominant way by which it degrades.  Rate = ln2/doubling time, where doubling time of strain MG1655 = 20min.  Assuming steady-state growth in LB broth as presented in paper.  rate = ln2/20 = 0.035/min</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <th>d<sub>protein</sub></th>
          <td>Protein degradation rate</td>
-         <td>0.050</td>
+         <td>0.035</td>
          <td>1/min</td>
          <td>[http://jb.asm.org/content/189/23/8746.full]</td>
-         <td>There is no active degradation pathway and that dilution is the dominant way by which the protein level decreases in a cell.  Rate = 1/doubling time, where doubling time = 20min.  Assuming steady-state growth in LB broth as presented in paper.</td>
+         <td>There is no active degradation pathway and that dilution is the dominant way by which it degrades.  Rate = ln2/doubling time, where doubling time of strain MG1655 = 20min.  Assuming steady-state growth in LB broth as presented in paper.  rate = ln2/20 = 0.035/min</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <th>k<sub>2</sub></th>
          <td>Protein production rate (PudA)</td>
-         <td>4.7</td>
+         <td>2.2</td>
          <td>1/min</td>
          <td>Please see derivation 2 below.</td>
@@ Line 437: / Line 386: @@
          <td>Initial: 0.008</td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>-</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>-</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 468: / Line 417: @@
 **assume 200 copies per cell
 *∴ concentration of the gene per cell = N x 200 x 1.66x10<sup>-6</sup>mM, where N = number of base pairs
-**∴ concentration of the gene BDH2 (N = 768) in the volume of an E.coli cell is = 0.25mM
+**∴ concentration of the gene PudA (N = 1644) in the volume of an E.coli cell is = 0.55mM
 *Transcription rate in E.coli = 80bp/s[http://kirschner.med.harvard.edu/files/bionumbers/fundamentalBioNumbersHandout.pdf] = 80 x 1.66x10<sup>-6</sup>mM/s = 80 x 1.66x10<sup>-6</sup> x 60mM/min = 7.97x10<sup>-3</sup>mM/min
-*∴ Rate of mRNA_BDH2 production under the control of pBAD = 7.97x10<sup>-3</sup> ÷ 0.25 = '''0.032/min'''
+*∴ Rate of mRNA_pudA production under the control of pBAD = 7.97x10<sup>-3</sup> ÷ 0.25 = '''0.015/min'''
-'''2.Protein production rate of BDH2, k<sub>2</sub>'''
+'''2.Protein production rate of PudA, k<sub>2</sub>'''
 *Average molecular weight(Mw) of an amino acid(aa)= 110g/mol[http://www.genscript.com/conversion.html][http://www.promega.com/~/media/Files/Resources/Technical%20References/Amino%20Acid%20Abbreviations%20and%20Molecular%20Weights.pdf]
 *Average mass of an amino acid = 110g/mol x 1.66x10<sup>-24</sup>=1.83x10<sup>-22</sup>g/L
@@ Line 478: / Line 427: @@
 **∴Molar concentration of one aa = [[File:Imperial College Molar conc cal aa.JPG|150px]] = 1.66x10<sup>-5</sup>mM
 *Translation rate = 20aa/s = (20 x 1.66x10<sup>-5</sup> x 60)mM/min = 0.020mM/min
-*BDH2 comprises of 256aa[http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q2PEN2&format=html]
+*PudA comprises of 548aa[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830598000663]
-**∴concentration of BDH2's aa in the volume of an E.coli = 1.66x10<sup>-5</sup>mM x 256 = 4.25x10<sup>-3</sup>mM
+**∴concentration of PudA's aa in the volume of an E.coli = 1.66x10<sup>-5</sup>mM x 548 = 9.10x10<sup>-3</sup>mM
-*∴ Rate of protein production = 0.020 ÷ 4.25x10<sup>-3</sup> = '''4.7/min'''
+*∴ Rate of protein production = 0.020 ÷ 4.25x10<sup>-3</sup> = '''2.2/min'''
 </p>
 <h4>PUR degradation module</h4>
 <p>The reaction equation of the PUR degradation is:</p>
-[Polyurethane]+[PudA]= 5 [ethylene glycol] + 5 [polyisocyanate] + [PudA]
+[Polyurethane]+[PudA]= 4 [ethylene glycol] + 4 [polyisocyanate] + [PudA]
 <p><b>Assumptions:</b></p>
-<p>We assumed 1 mole of polyurethane dispersion can produce 5 moles of ethylene glycol. </p>
+<p>We assumed 1 mole of polyurethane dispersion can produce 4 moles of ethylene glycol. </p>
-<p>The molecular weight of a single polyurethane monomer is 470 g/mol whereas the molecular weight of the polyurethane dispersion is around 2000 g/mol.[http://www.polyurethanes.basf.de/pu/solutions/en/content/group/Arbeitsgebiete_und_Produkte/Grundprodukte/Lupraphen-Produktuebersicht_Gewicht]Therefore, the short-chain polyurethane consists approximately 5 monomers. 5 molecules of ethylene glycol will be produced by degrading one chain of polymer.</p>
+<p>The molecular weight of a single polyurethane monomer is 470 g/mol whereas the molecular weight of the polyurethane dispersion is around 2000 g/mol.[http://www.polyurethanes.basf.de/pu/solutions/en/content/group/Arbeitsgebiete_und_Produkte/Grundprodukte/Lupraphen-Produktuebersicht_Gewicht]Therefore, the short-chain polyurethane consists approximately 4 monomers. 4 molecules of ethylene glycol will be produced by degrading one chain of polymer.</p>
 <p>We also assumed a simple Michaelis-Menten mechanism for PudA</p>
-[[File:MMPUR.png]]
+[[File:MMPUR.png|400px|centre]]
-<p>The parameters for the kinetic equations are:</p>
+<p>"[PudA]"is the concentration of the PudA enyme whereas "[Polyurethane]" is the concentration of the polyurethane. The kinetic parameters are defined as below:</p>
 <table border="2" bgcolor="#efefef">
         <tr>
@@ Line 498: / Line 447: @@
          <th>Units</th>
          <th>Sources</th>
+        <th>Species</th>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 505: / Line 455: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830598000663]</td>
+        <td>Comamonasacidovorans<td>
        </tr>
@@ Line 514: / Line 464: @@
          <td>1/min</td>
          <td>[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830598000663]</td>
+         <td>Comamonasacidovorans<td>
        </tr>
        </table>
+<p><b>Assumptions:</b></p>
+<p>1. The kinetic parameters of PudA are not from the strain E.coli K12 MG1665 we are using. So the assumption here is that the kinetic property of pudA in E.coli is close to that in Comamonasacidovorans</p>
+<p>2. Considerations of temperature change and PH change are not included in the model. Therefore, the assumption is that they remain constant during the degradation </p>
+<h4>Secretion module</h4>
 <p>The efficiency of <b>Secretion</b> is assumed to be 90% secretion over 2 hours.[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1251600/] The rate of secretion in the model is therefore:</p>
 <p>rate of secretion = 0.9[concentration of PudA]/120 (mM/mins) </p>
-<h2>Simulations and Results</h2>
+<h4>Simulation Results and Industrial Implementation</h4>
-<p>In terms of ethylene glycol toxicity, if we can't let the concentration of ethylene glycol over than 200mM, the maximum initial concentration of polyurethane dispersion is 40mM because one mole of polyurethane dispersion can produce 5 moles of ethylene glycol. (from the derivation above) If we put 40mM as the initial concentration in the model, the simulation result is:</p>
+<p>The simulation result we worked out is especially related to the industrial degradation SRF which we aim to achieve a high degradation efficiency. According to the [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/Industrial_Implementation data] we estimated for the percentage Polyurethane in SRF, we have about 5% Polyurethane contained in the waste. Therefore, in the model, we assumed 50g of polyurethane in 1kg of SRF based on the estimation. If we put 1kg of waste into a 5L bioreactor, the approximate concentration of polyurethane would be 5mM. Here is the simulation result: </p>
-[[File:PURgraph.png]]
+[[File:PURgraph.png|1000px|centre]]
-<p>40mM of polyurethane dispersion can be efficiently degraded in 20 mins. In case if we keep the concentration of the plastic below 40mM. The ethylene glycol won't affect the cell growth in our assays. 40mM is converted to 80g/L which suggests no more than 80 grams of polyurethane to be put in the system in order to avoid toxicity.   </p>
+<p>The modelling result shows that we can efficiently degrade Polyurethane in SRF even in industrial scale. 5mM of polyurethane dispersion can be efficiently degraded in 15 mins. The final concentration of ethylene glycol we produced would be 20 mM that is under the toxicity limitation, this proves that our bio-reactor can maintain the efficiency without the toxicity effects. </p>
-<p>As for the implementation of MAPLE system, the polyurethane degradation enzymes in our system are very efficient. Therefore, we need an efficient filter which removing ethylene glycol from the system.
+<p>As for the implementation of MAPLE system, the polyurethane degradation enzymes in our system are very efficient. Therefore, we need an efficient filter which removing ethylene glycol from the system. </p>
+<html>
+<h4>PUR degradation model:Download</h4>
+<p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/File:Degradation_PUR%26PLA.zip"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/8/8c/ICL_DownloadIcon.png" width="180px" /></a></p>
+</html>
 <html>
@@ Line 532: / Line 489: @@
 <div id="CollapsiblePanelMod2" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h1>2.0 P(3HB) synthesis: Deterministic model</h1></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h3>2.0 P(3HB) synthesis model      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h1></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
-This section is about modelling the plastic-synthesising <i>E.coli</i> developed in our project.  The plastic that this module synthesises is the bioplastic poly-3-hydroxybutyrate, also known as P(3HB).  The content below shows the process of building, designing and optimisation of the model.  Also, the considerations, assumptions and limitations will be discussed.
+This section is about modelling the plastic-synthesising <i>E.coli</i> developed in our project.  The plastic that this module synthesises is the bioplastic poly-3-hydroxybutyrate, also known as P(3HB).  The content below shows the process of building, designing and optimising the model.  Also, the considerations, assumptions and limitations will be discussed.
-<b>Specifications for the model</b>
-*Input = monomer (3HB)
-*Output = polymer (P(3HB))
 <p align="justify">
 The model was built and simulated in Simbiology, a Matlab package designed for modelling biological systems.  In our model we have a compartment (labelled "<i>E.coli</i>_1") that represents our engineered cell.  The compartment contains the reactions and species that interact with the polymer synthesis pathway.
 </p>
+<p>Here is our model for P(3HB) synthesis. It is part of module 1, this model uses glucose from waste as the input. Here we have the phaCAB operon, which convertsthe metabolite acetyl-coA into poly-3-hydroxybutyrate. We integrated our synthetic pathway into the metabolic pathway. This allowed us to quantitatively predict the P(3HB) production over time. More details about the metabolic model can be found in [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/BioPlastic_Recycling:_PHB Module 2].  </p>
+[[File:Glucose_Pathway.png|centre|800px]]
+<p>Firstly, consider the model concerning the synthetic pathway. This model does not take into account the existence of the metabolic pathway present within the bacteria. The synthetic pathway is mainly used for a sensitivity analysis by assuming minimum interference to the cell metabolism. The pathway is rearranged for clarity. </p>
 <p align="justify">
 The pathways on the right half of the cell are genetic expressions of the 3 enzymes involved in the plastic synthesis pathway.  The pathways on the left represent the actual P(3HB) production pathway.
@@ Line 554: / Line 508: @@
 [[File:Imperial College Circuit key.JPG]]
+<p align="justify">
+As can be seen in the Key (above), the yellow, solid circle represents a reaction object and for each object parameter the following needs to be specified for the simulation to work:
+</p>
+*Rate equation or kinetic law (e.g. mass action, Michaelis-Menten etc.)
+*Parameters in the rate equation
+*Species involved in the reaction
+*Value and units for each parameter
+<p align="justify">
+Simbiology will then use an ODE solver (ode15 or sundial) to solve these ODEs and give a plot of the specified output(s) (concentration level of a species over time, for instance).
+</p>
+*Note that 3HB deg, Acetoacetate deg, AcetoacetylCoA deg and 3HB-CoA deg are degradation rates (all = 0.035/min, please see assumptions below) of the corresponding species formed along the P(3HB) synthesis pathway.
 <html>
 </div>
@@ Line 559: / Line 524: @@
 <div id="CollapsiblePanelMod3" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h3>2.1 Ordinary Differential Equations</h3></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>2.1 Ordinary Differential Equations      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h3></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
-<h4>Genetic regulations and expressions</h4>
+<h5>Genetic regulations and expressions</h5>
-         <h5>BDH2 (3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase)</h5>
+         <h6>BDH2 (3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase)</h6>
-         [[File:Imperial College BDH2 exp.JPG|thumb|500px|none|alt=Alt text|Schematic of the gene expression of BDH2 as seen in the model diagram]]
+         [[File:Imperial College BDH2 exp.JPG|thumb|500px|center|alt=Alt text|Schematic of the gene expression of BDH2 as seen in the model diagram]]
-         [[File:Imperial College BDH2 gene.JPG|500px|none]]
+         [[File:Imperial College BDH2 gene.JPG|500px|center]]
-         <h5>PhaB (Acetoacetyl-CoA reductase)and PhaC (P(3HB) synthase)</h5>
+         <h6>PhaB (Acetoacetyl-CoA reductase)and PhaC (P(3HB) synthase)</h6>
-         [[File:Imperial College PhaBC exp.JPG|thumb|500px|none|alt=Alt text|Schematic of the gene expression of PhaB and PhaC as seen in the model diagram]]
+         [[File:Imperial College PhaBC exp.JPG|thumb|500px|center|alt=Alt text|Schematic of the gene expression of PhaB and PhaC as seen in the model diagram]]
-         [[File:Imperial College PhaBC gene.JPG|700px|none]]
+         [[File:Imperial College PhaBC gene.JPG|700px|center]]
 <html>
@@ Line 579: / Line 544: @@
 <div id="CollapsiblePanelMod4" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h5>Values, sources and assumptions</h5></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h5>Values, sources and assumptions      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h5></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
@@ Line 589: / Line 554: @@
          <th>Units</th>
          <th>Sources</th>
-         <th>Assumptions</th>
+         <th>Assumptions/Notes</th>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 605: / Line 570: @@
          <td>dimensionless</td>
          <td>[http://parts.igem.org/Part:pSB1C3?title=Part:pSB1C3]</td>
-         <td>Rounded to 2.0 from 2.26 as Simbiology wouldn't allow a non-integer value for such parameter.</td>
+         <td>For pBAD strong.  Taken from the parts registry page.  Rounded to 2.0 from 2.26 as Simbiology wouldn't allow a non-integer value for such parameter.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 613: / Line 578: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K206000:Characterization]</td>
-         <td>Taking the "switch point" as the activation coefficient</td>
+         <td>For pBAD strong.  Taking the "switch point" (from the corresponding parts registry page) as the activation coefficient.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <th>d<sub>mRNA</sub></th>
          <td>mRNA degradation rate</td>
-         <td>0.10</td>
+         <td>0.035</td>
          <td>1/min</td>
-        <td>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC420366/pdf/07X.pdf]</td>
+         <td>[http://jb.asm.org/content/189/23/8746.full]</td>
-         <td>Taking the value of mRNA half-life in <i>E.coli</i> strain MG1655 as 6.8min.  rate = ln2/half-life = ln2/6.8 = 0.10</td>
+         <td>There is no active degradation pathway and that dilution is the dominant way by which it degrades.  Rate = ln2/doubling time, where doubling time of strain MG1655 = 20min.  Assuming steady-state growth in LB broth as presented in paper.  rate = ln2/20 = 0.035/min</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <th>d<sub>protein</sub></th>
          <td>Protein degradation rate</td>
-         <td>0.050</td>
+         <td>0.035</td>
          <td>1/min</td>
-        <td>[http://jb.asm.org/content/189/23/8746.full]</td>
+         <td>[http://jb.asm.org/content/189/23/8746.full]</td>
-         <td>There is no active degradation pathway and that dilution is the dominant way by which the protein level decreases in a cell.  Rate = 1/doubling time, where doubling time = 20min.  Assuming steady-state growth in LB broth as presented in paper.</td>
+         <td>There is no active degradation pathway and that dilution is the dominant way by which it degrades.  Rate = ln2/doubling time, where doubling time of strain MG1655 = 20min.  Assuming steady-state growth in LB broth as presented in paper.  rate = ln2/20 = 0.035/min</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 652: / Line 617: @@
          <td>Initial: 0.008</td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 693: / Line 658: @@
 <div id="CollapsiblePanelMod5" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h5>Derivations</h5></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h5>Derivations      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h5></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
@@ Line 720: / Line 685: @@
 '''3.Protein production rate for PhaB and PhaC, k<sub>3</sub>'''
-*Relative promoter strengths: J23104 = 1.3RPU, J23101 = 1.0RPU.
+*Relative promoter strengths: J23104 = 1.3RPU, J23101 = 1.0RPU.[http://sb6.biobricks.org/poster/automated-bioparts-characterisation-for-synthetic-biology/]
 **∴ 104 is 1.3x stronger than 101.
 * In absolute units: take GFP synthesis rate (molecules per min per cell) and approximate that as a generic protein synthesis rate for the promoter.
-** GFP synthesis rate of 101 = 2232 molecules per min per cell.
+** GFP synthesis rate of 101 = 2232 molecules per min per cell.[http://sb6.biobricks.org/poster/automated-bioparts-characterisation-for-synthetic-biology/]
 **∴ GFP synthesis rate of 104 = 1.3 x 2232 = 2902 molecules per min per cell
 * Assume 1 molecule in an <i>E.coli</i> cell gives a concentration of 1nM.
@@ Line 734: / Line 699: @@
 <div id="CollapsiblePanelMod6" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h3>2.2 Enzyme kinetics</h3></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>2.2 Enzyme kinetics      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h3></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
+*Note:
+**v = velocity of reaction
+**Ac-CoA = acetyl-CoA
+**AcAc-CoA = Acetoacetyl-CoA
+**AcAc = acetoacetate
 <h4>BDH2 (3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase)</h4>
@@ Line 750: / Line 720: @@
          <th>Value</th>
          <th>Units</th>
-         <th>Sources</th>
+         <th>Source</th>
-         <th>Assumptions</th>
+         <th>Assumptions/Notes</th>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 759: / Line 729: @@
          <td>1/min</td>
          <td>[http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2009/01/03/jb.mvn186.full.pdf]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Sequences derived from ''Pseudomonas fragi'' but kinetic values from expression and purification of enzymes in ''E. coli'' XL1 Blue</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 767: / Line 737: @@
          <td>1/min</td>
          <td>[http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2009/01/03/jb.mvn186.full.pdf]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Sequences derived from ''Pseudomonas fragi'' but kinetic values from expression and purification of enzymes in ''E. coli'' XL1 Blue</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 775: / Line 745: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://www.hal.inserm.fr/hal-00374321/]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Organism Tetrahymena pyriformis</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 783: / Line 753: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://www.hal.inserm.fr/hal-00374321/]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Organism Tetrahymena pyriformis</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <th>K<sub>m,AcAc</sub></th>
          <td>Michaelis constant for AcAc</td>
-         <td>initial: 0.37</td>
+         <td>0.37</td>
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2009/01/03/jb.mvn186.full.pdf]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Values in paper reference</td>
        </tr>
       <tr>
@@ Line 799: / Line 769: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2009/01/03/jb.mvn186.full.pdf]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Values in paper reference</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 807: / Line 777: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2009/01/03/jb.mvn186.full.pdf]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Values in paper reference</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 815: / Line 785: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2009/01/03/jb.mvn186.full.pdf]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>source organism <i>Pseudomonas fragi</i></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 822: / Line 792: @@
          <td>-</td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>-</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>-</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 830: / Line 800: @@
          <td>initial: 1.6x10<sup>-13</sup></td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <th>[3HB]</th>
-         <td>Concentration of 3HB</td>
+         <td>Intracellular concentration of 3HB</td>
-         <td>initial: 0.0010</td>
+         <td>6.4x10<sup>-14</sup></td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>-</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>External concentration of 3HB assumed to be 0.01g.  This is shared by 1.5x10<sup>12</sup> cells.  Therefore, one cell has 0.01/1.5x10<sup>12</sup> = 6.7x10<sup>-15</sup> g.  To convert it into mol/L: mass of 3HB/molar mass of 3HB = 6.7x10<sup>-15</sup>/104.1 = 6.4x10<sup>-17</sup> M = 6.4x10<sup>-14</sup> mM</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 846: / Line 816: @@
          <td>initial: 1.0x10<sup>-13</sup></td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 854: / Line 824: @@
          <td>initial: 2.5x10<sup>-14</sup></td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
        </tr>
 </table>
@@ Line 872: / Line 842: @@
          <th>Units</th>
          <th>Sources</th>
-         <th>Assumptions</th>
+         <th>Assumptions/Notes</th>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 896: / Line 866: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000398617590003X]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Enzyme is naturally expressed in ''E.coli'': assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 904: / Line 874: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://www.brenda-enzymes.org/php/result_flat.php4?ecno=2.8.3.8]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Enzyme is naturally expressed in ''E.coli'': assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 912: / Line 882: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://aem.asm.org/content/73/24/7814.full.pdf]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Enzyme is naturally expressed in ''E.coli'': assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 920: / Line 890: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000398617590003X]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Enzyme is naturally expressed in ''E.coli'': assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 927: / Line 897: @@
          <td>initial: 1.0x10<sup>-13</sup></td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 935: / Line 905: @@
          <td>initial: 1.0x10<sup>-13</sup></td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 943: / Line 913: @@
          <td>initial: 1.0x10<sup>-13</sup></td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+      </tr>
+       <tr>
+        <th>[Ac-CoA]</th>
+        <td>Concentration of Ac-CoA</td>
+        <td>initial: 1.0x10<sup>-14</sup></td>
+        <td>mM</td>
+        <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+        <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
        </tr>
 </table>
@@ Line 961: / Line 939: @@
          <th>Units</th>
          <th>Sources</th>
-         <th>Assumptions</th>
+         <th>Assumptions/Notes</th>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 969: / Line 947: @@
          <td>1/min</td>
          <td>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23913421]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Gene in Ralstonia eutropha was engineered to put in E.coli and then purified</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 977: / Line 955: @@
          <td>1/min</td>
          <td>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3286259]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>originally in Zoogloea ramigera, expressed in E.coli and then purified</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 985: / Line 963: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23913421]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Gene in Ralstonia eutropha was engineered to put in E.coli and then purified</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 993: / Line 971: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23913421]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Gene in Ralstonia eutropha was engineered to put in E.coli and then purified</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,001: / Line 979: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb12740.x/pdf]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>purified from Methylobacterium extorquens</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,009: / Line 987: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3286259]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>originally in Zoogloea ramigera, expressed in E.coli and then purified</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,016: / Line 994: @@
          <td>-</td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>-</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>-</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,024: / Line 1,002: @@
          <td>initial: 1.0x10<sup>-13</sup></td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,032: / Line 1,010: @@
          <td>initial:3.8x10<sup>-14</sup></td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,040: / Line 1,018: @@
          <td>initial:1.5x10<sup>-13</sup></td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,065: / Line 1,043: @@
          <th>Units</th>
          <th>Sources</th>
-         <th>Assumptions</th>
+         <th>Assumptions/Notes</th>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,073: / Line 1,051: @@
          <td>1/min</td>
          <td>[http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0003986101925226/1-s2.0-S0003986101925226-]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>-</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,081: / Line 1,059: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://www.brenda-enzymes.org/php/result_flat.php4?ecno=2.3.1.B5]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Enzyme is naturally expressed in ''E.coli'': assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,088: / Line 1,066: @@
          <td>-</td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>-</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>-</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,096: / Line 1,074: @@
          <td>-</td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>-</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>-</td>
        </tr>
 </table>
@@ Line 1,114: / Line 1,092: @@
          <th>Units</th>
          <th>Sources</th>
-         <th>Assumptions</th>
+         <th>Assumptions/Notes</th>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,138: / Line 1,116: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003986176901521]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Enzyme is naturally expressed in ''E.coli'': assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <th>K<sub>m,AcAc-CoA</sub></th>
          <td>Michaelis constant for AcAc-CoA</td>
-         <td>0.47</td>
+         <td>0.1</td>
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003986176901521]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Enzyme is naturally expressed in ''E.coli'': assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,154: / Line 1,132: @@
          <td>mM</td>
          <td>[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003986176901521]</td>
-         <td></td>
+         <td>Enzyme is naturally expressed in ''E.coli'': assume the enzyme is stable during the time course of the simulation.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,161: / Line 1,139: @@
          <td>initial: 1.0x10<sup>-13</sup></td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,169: / Line 1,147: @@
          <td>initial: 1.0x10<sup>-13</sup></td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
@@ Line 1,177: / Line 1,155: @@
          <td>initial: 5.5x10<sup>-13</sup></td>
          <td>mM</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
-         <td>see section 1.7 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
+         <td>see section 2.5 "Initial concentrations of metabolites"</td>
        </tr>
 </table>
@@ Line 1,187: / Line 1,165: @@
 <div id="CollapsiblePanelMod7" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h5>Explanations</h5></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h5>Reaction kinetics and mechanisms      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h5></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
-blablabla
+<p>List of enzymes and the corresponding mechanisms by which they work in the synthesis pathway</p>
+*BDH2: Ordered-sequential bi-bi mechanism[http://www.brenda-enzymes.org/php/result_flat.php4?ecno=1.1.1.30]
+*atoAD: Ping-pong bi-bi mechanism[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000398617590003X]
+*atoB: Ping-pong bi-bi mechanism[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000398617590003X]
+*PhaB: Ordered-sequential bi-bi mechanism[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]
+*PhaC: Michaelis-Menten[http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/85133798/new-insights-activation-substrate-recognition-polyhydroxyalkanoate-synthase-from-ralstonia-eutropha]
 <html>
@@ Line 1,198: / Line 1,181: @@
 <div id="CollapsiblePanelMod8" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h3>2.3 Simulation results</h3></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>2.3 Simulation results      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h3></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
-<h4>P(3HB) production</h4>
+<p align="justify">
+Using the values presented in the tables above, the deterministic model was simulated to see how much P(3HB) could be formed inside the cell.  However, with the single cell model, it would be difficult to reflect how much of the plastic could actually be formed on a macroscopic scale.  Therefore, modifications to the simulation algorithm were needed to give scaled-up simulation results.
+</p>
+<p align="justify">
+In the scaled-up regime, though, new limitations were encountered.  For example, growth, cell division and the concentration gradient that each cell encounters and how much can be taken up by the cells.  Given the data available, what could be done was to assume that the bacteria were in a bioreactor, with constant nutrient and oxygen supply, and that they were in the phase of stationary growth (please see assumptions and explanations under the graphs below).
+</p>
+<p align="justify">
+Here, three graphs are presented to show P(3HB)formation over time.  The first two graphs are (i)single-cell model results, concentration in mM and (ii) single-cell model results, concentration in g/L.  The first graph was the original graph produced from Simbiology as all concentrations were expressed in mM in the model.  However, to gain a more intuitive sense of how much could be produced g/L was used.  The third graph is the scaled-up simulation result.
+</p>
+<p>'''(i) please see assumptions and explanations below'''</p>
+[[File:Imperial College 1.JPG]]
+<p>'''(ii) please see assumptions and explanations below'''</p>
+[[File:Imperial College 2.JPG]]
+<p>'''(iii) please see assumptions and explanations below'''</p>
+[[File:Imperial College 3.JPG]]
+<p>'''Graphs (i) and (ii): assumptions and explanations'''</p>
+*To convert from mM to g/L:
+**Molecular weight(Mw) of P(3HB) = 1.8x10<sup>12</sup>g/mol[http://webpages.charter.net/hvalentin/PDF-files/18.pdf]
+<p align="justify">(Please note that this value was taken from a paper about the "Production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) in recombinant Escherichia coli grown on glucose" instead of the production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate).  However, this is the closest we managed to get as far as species, substrate and type of plastic are concerned.</p>
+<p align="justify">Also, it was noticed that the molecular weight would change depending on the cultivation time (as conditions such as growth and pH can also affect it) and it was hard to find a paper that contains the exact same conditions and the range of cultivation times for our simulations.  Furthermore, in reality there wouldn't be a single value of molecular weight obtained, but a range of values (known as polydispersity).[http://aem.asm.org/content/78/9/3177.full]  Therefore, it was assumed that the molecular weight would remain constant during the time course of the simulation and that the value should be considered as an average.)</p>
+*∴P(3HB)concentration in mM x 10<sup>-3</sup> x 1.8x10<sup>12</sup>g/mol = concentration in g/L
+<p>'''Graph (iii): assumptions and explanations'''</p>
+* Assume 1.5x10<sup>12</sup>cells in a 1L broth, calculated from value obtained from BioNumbers.  A range was given: 1-2x10<sup>9</sup> cells/ml, so 1.5x10<sup>9</sup> was taken. [http://bionumbers.hms.harvard.edu/bionumber.aspx?s=n&id=104831&ver=5]
+**Conditions and considerations accompanying this value are:
+***growth medium: LB broth
+***Cultivation temperature: 37°C
+***wild-type E. coli K-12 strain MG1655 (NB: though not exactly our engineered one, it is the correct strain)
+*Assume stationary growth phase.
+*Assume that the amount of P(3HB) accumulated during the time course of simulation doesn't exceed the cell's capacity or ability to contain it.
+*Same metabolic considerations as above (single-cell results)
+*Simbiology single-cell simulation results multiplied by the number of cells stated above to give the red curve.
 <html>
 </div>
@@ Line 1,209: / Line 1,224: @@
 <div id="CollapsiblePanelMod9" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h3>2.4 Model-guided design and optimisation</h3></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>2.4 Model-guided design and optimisation      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h3></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
@@ Line 1,230: / Line 1,245: @@
 [[File:Imperial College Sensitivity halfnorm custom.JPG|200px|center|none]]
 [[File:Imperial College Half-normalised species.JPG]]
+<h4>Sensitivity analysis: enzyme concentrations </h4>
+<p>The sensitivity analysis of the enzymes involved in the synthetic pathway is carried out, which determine the most sensitive enzyme in the pathway</p>
+<p>We plot a time integral of the sensitivity analysis which has the algorithm as: </p>
+[[File:SenAnaE.png|400px|center|none]]
+<p>The senstivity result is:</p>
+[[File:SensitivityE.png|600px|center]]
+<p>According to the simulation result, we found that the PHB production is highly sensitive to the concentration of PhaB and PhaC. In contrast, the system is not sensitive to the concentration of atoAD and atoB. In theory, increase the concentration of any of the enzyme will increase the flux of the system. However, for the strain E.coli K12 MG1655, both atoAD (acetoacetate:acetoacetyl-coA transferase) and atoB （acetoacetyl-coA thiolase) favour the reverse reactions, it becomes the rate limiting step in our pathway. Acetoacetyl-coA intends to be converted to acetoacetate instead of 3HB-coA. [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003986177904969]Therefore, the concentration of PhaB become really critical which push the system to flow in the forward direction.  </p>
 <h4>Scan with different levels of PhaB</h4>
 <p align="justify"> The plot below is to show that increasing PhaB concentration within the engineered organism would have a positive effect on the concentration of the P(3HB) synthesised.  As so many parameters within the model were taken from different sources, it would be difficult to give a simulation plot that is accurate quantitatively. It was decided to show the single cell simulation for this because the scans were carried out up to the doubling time of 20mins, hence avoided the issue of scaling-up which would have otherwise subjected the simulation to more errors.  Therefore, this plot should be interpreted from a qualitative perspective and the trend should be observed.
@@ Line 1,238: / Line 1,259: @@
 <h4>Difference between promoter expressions after optimisation</h4>
+<p>In order to choose the strongest promoter that is available to increase the gene expression. We ran a parameter scan of enzyme expression rates of a range of Anderson's constitutive promoters. The simulations shows the PHB production under different Anderson's promoters. The promoters we tested are:</p>
+<table border="2" bgcolor="#efefef">
+<tr>
+ <th width="150">promoter</th>
+ <th>biobrick</th>
+ <th>GFP synthesis rate (mM/min)</th>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <th>J23100</th>
+ <td>[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23100] </td>
+ <td>0.41 </td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <th>J23101</th>
+ <td>[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23101]</td>
+ <td>0.45</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <th>J23104</th>
+ <td>[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23104]</td>
+ <td>0.58</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <th>J23118</th>
+ <td>[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23118]</td>
+ <td>0.31</td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+<p>The derivations of the GFP synthesis rate are:</p>
+<p>*Relative promoter strengths: J23104 = 1.3RPU, J23101 = 1.0RPU, J23100 = 0.92RPU, J23118 = 0.76RPU[http://sb6.biobricks.org/poster/automated-bioparts-characterisation-for-synthetic-biology/]
+* In absolute units: take GFP synthesis rate (molecules per min per cell) and approximate that as a generic protein synthesis rate for the promoter.
+** GFP synthesis rate of 101 = 2232 molecules per min per cell.[http://sb6.biobricks.org/poster/automated-bioparts-characterisation-for-synthetic-biology/]
+* Assume 1 molecule in an <i>E.coli</i> cell gives a concentration of 1nM.
+** ∴ GFP synthesis rate of 101 = 2232 x 1nM = 2.2x10<sup>-6</sup>nM/min per cell
+* Plasmid copy number assumed as 200 (as in derivation 1)
+** ∴ GFP synthesis rate of 101 in our <i>E.coli</i> = 200 x 2.2x10<sup>-6</sup> = 0.00045nM/min = '''0.45mM/min'''
+** ∴ The GFP synthesis rates of other promoters can be calculated by multiplying the RPU value with the GFP synthesis rate of J23101 promoter.</p>
+<p>The simulation result:</p>
+[[File:ANDERSON.png|600px|center]]
+<p>Although there is just a small increase the gene expression rate, J23104 promoter achieved a much higher PHB production than other constitutive promoters. Therefore, we decided to use J23104 promoter for our improved biobrick [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051 BBa_K1149051].</p>
+<p><b>Here is our experimental results that show we have 11 times more PHB after the change of promoter.</b></p>
+{| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto;"
+|[[File:Moreplastic.JPG|thumbnail|left|500px|<b>Comparison of P3HB production </b> <b>  (left)</b> 1.5ml tube, natural phaCAB (BBa_K934001)  <b>(right)</b> 5ml tube, phaCAB expressed from the hybrid promoter, (BBa_K1149051).]]
+|}
+<html>
+<h4>P(3HB) synthesis model:Download</h4>
+<p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/File:P3HB_synthesis_model.zip"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/8/8c/ICL_DownloadIcon.png" width="180px" /></a></p>
+<h4>Additional script:Download</h4>
+<p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/File:P3HB_additional_scripts.zip"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/8/8c/ICL_DownloadIcon.png" width="180px" /></a></p>
+</html>
 <html>
 </div>
@@ Line 1,244: / Line 1,321: @@
 <div id="CollapsiblePanelMod10" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h3>2.5 Metabolic considerations</h3></div>
+<div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>2.5 Metabolic considerations      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h3></div>
 <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
-<p align="justify">In Module 1: Resourceful Plastic, we used glucose as the product from degradation to feed in the system where P3HB is produced. The synthetic pathway needs to be reconsidered if we are using glucose as a solo input to the system. Here, 3HB monomer is no longer the source so BDH2 should be removed from the pathway. Acetyl-coA becomes the key resource to produce P3HB. A metabolic model is needed to show the production of Acetyl-coA from glucose. Furthermore, our synthetic pathway involved several key metabolites from the pathway such as NADPH, NADP+, NADH and NAD+. The initial concentration of those metabolites can be determined from the metabolic model by assuming they are in their steady states. More features and results of the metabolic model can be found in Module 2.   </p>
+<p align="justify">In Module 1: Resourceful Plastic, glucose from the degradation is used as the input for the system that produces P(3HB). The P(3HB) synthetic pathway hence needs to be adapted for this purpose.  To do so, 3HB monomer would no longer be the source input to the engineered system.  So, BDH2 should be removed from the pathway. Acetyl-coA would then become the key resource to produce P(3HB). Also, a metabolic model was needed to show the production of Acetyl-coA from glucose. Furthermore, our synthetic pathway involves several key metabolites from the pathway such as NADPH, NADP+, NADH and NAD+. The initial concentration of those metabolites can be determined from the metabolic model by assuming they are in their steady states. More features and results of the metabolic model can be found in Module 2.   </p>
 <h4>Initial concentrations of metabolites</h4>
-<p align="justify">The metabolic model involves two pathways, Glycolysis pathway and TCA cycle. Where glucose is used as the single source of carbon. The reason is that Glucose is directly taken by Glycolysis pathway and there are some interactions between Acetyl-coA and TCA cycle. The model is based on original metabolic model by Angela Dixon.[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/] The metabolic model is built in MATLAB Simbiology extension as well. All reactions and pathways are based on ODEs and kinetic data. The model can dynamically predict the concentration of all metabolites involved by a defined duration.
+<p align="justify">The model presented in Section 2.0 contains a synthesis pathway that interact metabolic species involved in so many other metabolic reactions elsewhere in the cell.  It was, therefore, difficult to determine how much of these metabolites would be left available for our plastic synthesis pathway to utilise.  So, a simple metabolic model of the cell (more detail in next paragraph) was needed to simulate and show insight into this problem.  We decided to use the steady state levels of these metabolites (without the engineered pathway) and plug the values into the P(3HB) synthesis model in Section 2.0 as the initial concentrations.
+</p>
+<p align="justify">The metabolic model involves two pathways - glycolysis pathway and the TCA cycle, where glucose is used as the sole carbon source. The reason is that glucose is directly taken by the glycolysis pathway and there are interactions between Acetyl-coA and TCA cycle. This Simbiology model is based on the one built by Angela Dixon in '''<i>Predictive Mathematical Model for Polyhydroxybutyrate Synthesis in Escherichia coli</i>'''.[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]. All reactions and pathways are based on ODEs and kinetics data presented in the original model. It can dynamically predict the concentration of all metabolites involved over a defined simulation time course. </p>
 <p>The metabolic model for determining steady state concentrations is shown as below:</p>
 [[File:Metaloop.png]]
+<p><b>Keys:</b></p>
+[[File:KEYmeta.png|600px]]
 <p>The initial concentrations of all metabolites and kinetic data are referenced in the paper.[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/] The simulation of the metabolites is:</p>
 [[File:Metabolite.png]]
-<h4>Production of P3HB with glucose as the only source</h4>
+<p> Table of initial and steady-state concentrations of the metabolites:</p>
+<table border="2" bgcolor="#efefef">
+       <tr>
+        <th>Substrates</th>
+        <th>Initial concentration</th>
+        <th>Steady state concentration </th>
+        <th>Units</th>
+        <th>Sources</th>
+      </tr>
+      <tr>
+        <th>NADH</th>
+        <td>200</td>
+        <td>250</td>
+        <td>uM</td>
+        <td>[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]</td>
+      </tr>
+      <tr>
+        <th>NAD+</th>
+        <td>1200</td>
+        <td>1600</td>
+        <td>uM</td>
+        <td>[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]</td>
+      </tr>
+      <tr>
+        <th>Acetyl-coA</th>
+        <td>1000</td>
+         <td>100</td>
+        <td>uM</td>
+        <td>[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]</td>
+      </tr>
+      <tr>
+        <th>Coenzyme A</th>
+        <td>250</td>
+        <td>5500</td>
+        <td>uM</td>
+        <td>[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]</td>
+      </tr>
+<tr>
+        <th>NADPH</th>
+        <td>200</td>
+        <td>380</td>
+        <td>uM</td>
+        <td>[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]</td>
+      </tr>
+<tr>
+        <th>NADP+</th>
+        <td>1200</td>
+        <td>1100</td>
+        <td>uM</td>
+        <td>[http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/engineering_datasets/1/]</td>
+      </tr>
+      </table>
+<p align="justify">
-<p>Synthesis model scaled up and what that means for industrial implementation and MAPLE.</p>
+<p align="justify">
+It should also be noted that acetate, acetoacetate and acetoacetyl-CoA cannot be predicted by the metabolic model.  Therefore, their initial concentrations are rough estimates (value similar to other metabolites) such that a reasonable P(3HB) output can be produced.</p>
 <html>
 </div>
@@ Line 1,282: / Line 1,439: @@
 <b>We made two new improved constructs by modifying the native operon:</b>
-<p> The modellers in the drylab predicted that an increased level of phaB enzyme will increase the amount of PHB produced and therefore we decided to change the native Ralstonia eutropha promoter and RBS to a strong constitutive <i>E.coli</i> promoter (J23104) and RBS (0034) in front of the operon. We have succeeded with the swap and built the new biobrick [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149052 BBa_K1149052] which we refer to as constitutive phaCAB. In parallel, we have also assembled a different configuration of transcription initiation region: the "hybrid". Surprisingly, our results show that our "hybrid" phaCAB construct [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051 BBa_K1149051] significantly increased bioplastic production compared to native phaCAB. Please read on to discover more. </p>
+The modellers in the drylab predicted that an increased level of pha B enzyme will increase the amount of PHB produced and therefore we decided to change the native <i>Ralstonia eutropha</i> promoter and RBS to a strong constitutive <i>E.coli</i> promoter (J23104) and RBS (0034) in front of the operon. We have succeeded with the swap and built the new biobrick [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149052 BBa_K1149052] which we refer to as constitutive phaCAB. In parallel, we have also assembled a different configuration of transcription initiation region: the "hybrid". Surprisingly, our results show that our "hybrid" phaCAB construct [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051 BBa_K1149051] significantly increased bioplastic production compared to native pha CAB. Please read on to discover more. </p>
-We tested the promoter and RBS we were going to use by cloning them in front of amilCP blue chromoprotein ([http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149020 BBa_K1149020]). It was bright blue and we had some fun playing around with it as part of our communication work "[https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/Communication_work#<i>E.coli</i>_Art <i>E.coli</i>Art]".
+We tested the promoter and RBS by cloning them in front of amilCP blue chromoprotein gene  ([http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149020 BBa_K1149020]). As you can see from the plate below, this expresses a bright blue protein, which became an intrinsic part of our [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/Communication_work# BioNouveau] palette.
 <br>
 https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/f/fb/PlasticityBluePlate.JPG
@@ Line 1,312: / Line 1,469: @@
        <div id="CollapsiblePanel1" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0">Our chassis (MG1655) survives in mixed waste   <b>[CLICK TO EXPAND]</b></div>
+         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>Our chassis (MG1655) survives in mixed waste      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
          <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
@@ Line 1,318: / Line 1,475: @@
 <b>These assays were designed to test whether our chassis, <i>E.coli</i> (MG1655) could grow directly with waste over a long period of time. </b>
-<h3>Waste media</h3>
+<h4>Waste media</h4>
 {| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto;"
@@ Line 1,328: / Line 1,485: @@
-<h3>Waste conditioned media</h3>
+<h4>Waste conditioned media</h4>
 These assays were designed to test whether our chassis, <i>E.coli</i> MG1655 strain could grow with waste conditioned media (WCM) over a period of 24-48 hours.  Waste conditioned media is a filter sterilised version of the waste media and was designed for several reasons; Firstly we were unsure whether mixed waste would be toxic to <i>E.coli</i> and hence a less concentrated version may be more suitable and secondly large chunks of waste would prevent accurate OD600 measurements and therefore we decided to filter out the largest chunks.
@@ Line 1,352: / Line 1,509: @@
        </div>
        <div id="CollapsiblePanel2" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0">Mixed waste degradation: Polyurethane (PUR)   <b>[CLICK TO EXPAND]</b></div>
+         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>Mixed waste degradation: Polyurethane (PUR)      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
          <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
-<h3> PUR Esterase enzyme activity </h3>
+<h4> PUR Esterase enzyme activity </h4>
 <h4>Cell lysate assay</h4>
-<p align="justify">Since the PUR Esterases were not secreted, initially the cells were lysed to obtain crude cell extracts in order to test whether the enzymes are active. The [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/Western_Blots Western Blot results] showed that the constructs EstC2 [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149002 BBa_K1149002], PueB [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149004 BBa_K1149004] and PulA [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149006 BBa_K1149006] were being expressed. The cultures expressing these three constructs were grown, lysed by sonication and utilised in a colourimetric assay with the substrate analog para-Nitrophenyl butyrate. The data shows that PUR Esterase EstC2 [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149002 BBa_K1149002] is definitely active.</p>
+<p align="justify">Since the PUR Esterases were not secreted, initially the cells were lysed to obtain crude cell extracts in order to test whether the enzymes are active. The [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/Western_Blots Western Blot results] showed that the constructs EstCS2 [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149002 BBa_K1149002], PueB [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149004 BBa_K1149004] and PulA [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149006 BBa_K1149006] were being expressed. The cultures expressing these three constructs were grown, lysed by sonication and utilised in a colourimetric assay with the substrate analog para-Nitrophenyl butyrate. The data shows that PUR Esterase EstCS2 [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149002 BBa_K1149002] is definitely active.</p>
 <p align="justifiy"> para-Nitrophenyl butyrate (p-NP) is commonly used to indicate an enzyme’s esterase activity. The enzyme cleaves the ester bond and releases the 4-nitrophenol (4-NP), thus causing a colour change from colourless to yellow and an increased absorbance at wavelength 405 nm.</p>
@@ Line 1,368: / Line 1,525: @@
 <br><br><br>
-<p align="justify">The assay was run in the [http://www.eppendorf.com/int/index.php?sitemap=2.1&action=products&contentid=1&catalognode=87236 Eppendorf BioSpectrometer] was used to automatically read the absorbance of the reaction mixture every 30 seconds. The concentration of 4-Nitrophenol produced from the reaction was calculated using the Beer-Lambert Law; the extinction coefficient of 4-NP is 18,000 M-1 cm-1 at 405 nm. [https://www.neb.com/products/p0757-p-nitrophenyl-phosphate-pnpp]</p>
+<p align="justify">The assay was run in the [http://www.eppendorf.com/int/index.php?sitemap=2.1&action=products&contentid=1&catalognode=87236 Eppendorf BioSpectrometer] was used to automatically read the absorbance of the reaction mixture every 30 seconds. The concentration of 4-Nitrophenol produced from the reaction was calculated using the Beer-Lambert Law; the extinction coefficient of 4-NP is 18,000 M-1 cm-1 at 405 nm. </p>
 <p align="justify">The results below show the concentration of 4-NP produced by the three different PUR esterases and compare them to the Empty Vector and Substrate alone as negative controls.</p>
@@ Line 1,374: / Line 1,531: @@
 <br>
-[[File:4-NP_abs02.png|left|thumbnail|400px|<b>The increase in absorbance that accompanies the cleavage of para-Nitrophenyl butyrate by PUR Esterase EstC2. Figure by Imperial College London iGEM 2013</b>]]
+[[File:4-NP_abs02.png|left|thumbnail|400px|<b>The increase in absorbance that accompanies the cleavage of para-Nitrophenyl butyrate by PUR Esterase EstCS2. Figure by Imperial College London iGEM 2013</b>]]
-[[File:PUREstC2_graph.png|right|thumbnail|500px|<b>The concentration of 4-Nitrophenol released by PUR Esterase EstC2 activity. Empty Vector and Substrate alone were used as negative controls. Figure by Imperial College London iGEM 2013</b>]]
+[[File:PUREstC2_graph.png|right|thumbnail|480px|<b>The concentration of 4-Nitrophenol released by PUR Esterase EstCS2 activity. Empty Vector and Substrate alone were used as negative controls. Figure by Imperial College London iGEM 2013</b>]]
+<br><br><br>
-<p>The above graphs clearly show that PUR Esterase EstC2 is active and cleaving p-NP. The recorded concentrations of 4-NP, in the presence of this PUR Esterase, are much greater than with the Empty Vector or the Substrate alone. <b>Is PUR Esterase EstC2 active? Yes!</b></p>
+<p align#"justify">The above graphs clearly show that PUR Esterase EstCS2 is active and cleaving p-NP. The recorded concentrations of 4-NP, in the presence of this PUR Esterase, are much greater than with the Empty Vector or the Substrate alone.
+<b>Is PUR Esterase EstCS2 active? Yes!</b></p>
 <br><br>
-[[File:PueB_graph.png|left|thumbnail|450px|<b>The enzyme activity of PUR Esterase PueB. The graph shows the concentration of the 4-Nitrophenol released during 10 minutes incubation of para-Nitrophenyl butyrate with PueB and Empty Vector, as well as the p-NP substrate by itself. Figure made by Imperial College London 2013 iGEM</b>]]
+[[File:PueB_graph.png|left|thumbnail|400px|<b>The enzyme activity of PUR Esterase PueB. The graph shows the concentration of the 4-Nitrophenol released during 10 minutes incubation of para-Nitrophenyl butyrate with PueB and Empty Vector, as well as the p-NP substrate by itself. Figure made by Imperial College London 2013 iGEM</b>]]
-[[File:PulA_graph.png|right|thumbnail|450px|<b>The enzyme activity of PUR Esterase PulA. The graph shows the concentration of the 4-Nitrophenol released during 10 minutes incubation of para-Nitrophenyl butyrate with PulA and Empty Vector, as well as the p-NP substrate by itself.Figure made by imperial College London 2013 iGEM</b>]]
+[[File:PulA_graph.png|right|thumbnail|400px|<b>The enzyme activity of PUR Esterase PulA. The graph shows the concentration of the 4-Nitrophenol released during 10 minutes incubation of para-Nitrophenyl butyrate with PulA and Empty Vector, as well as the p-NP substrate by itself.Figure made by imperial College London 2013 iGEM</b>]]
 <br><br>
@@ Line 1,392: / Line 1,550: @@
 <br>
-<p align="justify"><b>Conclusion: PUR Esterase EstC2 is active!</b></p>
+<p align="justify"><b>Conclusion: PUR Esterase EstCS2 is active!</b></p>
 <br><br>
-<h4>Purified enzyme assay</h4>
-<b>Stay tuned</b>
 <html>
@@ Line 1,404: / Line 1,558: @@
        </div>
        <div id="CollapsiblePanel3" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0">Mixed waste degradation: Toxicity   <b>[CLICK TO EXPAND]</b></div>
+         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>Mixed waste degradation: Toxicity      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
          <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
-<h3>Ethylene glycol </h3>
+<h4>Ethylene glycol </h4>
 [[File:EG_growth.png|thumbnail|center|600px|<b> Ethylene glycol in LB with Stress Response cells.</b> MG1655 were grown in ethylene glycol, a byproduct of polyurethane degradation. Cells were grown in 0mM, 100mM or 200mM Ethylene Glycol. At 37°C, the concentrations of ethylene glycol used do not affect growth, however at 30°C, the increasing concentration results in halved growth. A two-tailed t-test addressing the null hypothesis, temperature does not affect growth with ethylene glycol shows that the null hypothesis must be rejected as p = 0.001. Data points show final time point after 6h growth for each concentration. Growth was at 37°C and 30°C with shaking over 6h. Error bars are SEM, n=4. Figure made by Imperial College London 2013 iGEM.]]
@@ Line 1,419: / Line 1,573: @@
        </div>
              <div id="CollapsiblePanel4" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0">Bioplastic production   <b>[CLICK TO EXPAND]</b></div>
+         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>Bioplastic production      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
          <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
-<p align="justify"><i>E.coli</i>MG1655 containing the PhaCAB construct accumulates the bioplastic P3HB inside its cells. P3HB can be visualised through staining with Nile Red, which fluoresces strongly in a hydrophobic environment, such as when it binds to the P3HB. However staining will be much lower in cells where P3HB is not present. To see whether P3HB was being produced we grew <i>E.coli</i> containing the phaCAB operon under the native promoter from <I>Ralstonia eutropha</I>. This produced the results we hoped for as seen in the image below. </p>
+<p align="justify"><i>E.coli</i> MG1655 containing the PhaCAB construct Part:BBa_K934001[http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K934001] accumulates the bioplastic P3HB inside its cells. P3HB can be visualised through staining with Nile Red, which fluoresces strongly in a hydrophobic environment, such as when it binds to the P3HB. However staining will be much lower in cells where P3HB is not present. To see whether P3HB was being produced we grew <i>E.coli</i> containing the phaCAB operon under the native promoter from <i>Ralstonia eutropha</i>. This produced the results we hoped for as seen in the image below. </p>
-         <p align="justify">This also provides a preliminary qualitative way in which to investigate the effect of changing the promoter to a stronger version in order to upregulate the amount of P3HB produced. The darker staining of the streaks of the constitutive and hybrid promoter containing constructs suggests the production of higher levels of P3HB in these strains. </p>
+<p>The P3HB production model indicated that upregulating atoB would lead to an increase in bioplastic production. We changed the promoter before the phaCAB operon to the strong promoter J23104 and a hybrid promoter we created.</p>
+<p align="justify">The Nile Red plates also provide a preliminary way in which to investigate the effect of changing the promoter to a stronger version. The darker staining of the streaks of the constitutive and hybrid promoter containing constructs suggests the production of higher levels of P3HB in these strains. </p>
 {| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto;"
-|[[File:Results-nile_red_plates.PNG|thumbnail|left|900px| <b> <i>E.coli</i> transformed with the phaCAB operon(native, hybrid, constitutive - different promoters expressing the operon) fluoresce when grown on LB-Agar plates with Nile Red stain as the P3HB produced  within them is stained. Those without the operon do not(EV- transformed with empty vector). When the promoter is changed from the native form to the our hybrid or the constitutive J23104 then the fluorescence is more intense, suggesting more P3HB is created.</b>]]
+|[[File:Results-nile_red_plates.PNG|thumbnail|left|900px| <b> <i>E.coli</i> transformed with the phaCAB operon(native, hybrid and constitutive are different promoters expressing the operon) fluoresce when grown on LB-Agar plates with Nile Red stain. The P3HB produced  within them is stained. Those without the operon do not(EV- transformed with empty pSB1C3). When the promoter is changed from the native form to the hybrid or constitutive J23104 then the fluorescence is more intense, indicating increased P3HB production.</b>]]
 |}
-     <p align="justify">Streaking the bacteria on Nile Red plates cannot be used to accurately decide the difference between P3HB production due to the effect differing thicknesses of cell layers will have on fluorescence intensity. We imaged the cells using the fluorescent microscope to qualitatively understand how much P3HB is produced per cell. As indicated by other authors, we saw that P3HB is found in localised granules within the bacteria. Empty vector containing cells show little fluorescence. In those that do, the staining is qualitatively different than in the phaCAB containing strains. Nile Red is also used as a lipid stain and this is indicated by its staining of the membranes of EV cells. In contrast, in phaCAB containing cells, staining is restricted to points within the cells.</p>
+     <p align="justify"> We imaged the cells using the fluorescent microscope to qualitatively understand how much P3HB is produced per cell. As indicated by other authors(1), we saw that P3HB is found in localised granules within the bacteria. Empty vector containing cells show little fluorescence. In those that do, the staining is qualitatively different than in the phaCAB containing strains. Nile Red is also used as a lipid stain and this is indicated by its staining of the membranes of EV cells. In contrast, in phaCAB containing cells, staining is restricted to points within the cells.</p>
      <p align="justify">Each fluorescent image was created by exciting the stain at 530nm for 100ms. Despite this standard treatment of samples the intensity of fluorescence produced by the cells containing the hybrid promoter is greater than from the constitutive ones. This could indicate a difference in the strength of the promoters which lead to phaCAB expression and therefore the amount of P3HB produced. The images also suggest that not every single <i>E.coli</i> is stained. This may be due to the conditions in which the cells were grown or may be dependent upon the stage in the lifecycle of the <i>E.coli</i>.</p>
 {| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto;"
 |[[File:Flourescent_Microscopy_Comparison.PNG|thumbnail|left|900px| <b>Fluorescent microscope images of <i>E.coli</i> stained with Nile Red. 1 -Empty vector, 2 - constitutive promoter phaCAB, 3 - hybrid promoter phaCAB. Images labelled a are fluorescent images excited at 530nm ovelaid on the bright field images shown in the b set of images. Images by Imperial College iGEM Team</b>]]
 |}
+<p>We extracted the P3HB using a simple technique which maintains the chain length of the P3HB while releasing it from the cells. The amount of plastic extracted from the hybrid promoter-phaCAB(BBa_K1149051[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051]) was much larger compared to the native promoter-phaCAB. All other conditions were kept the same.</p>
 {| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto;"
 |[[File:Extracted_phb_falcons.PNG|thumbnail|left|900px| <b>A comparison between the amount of plastic produced by bacteria containing an empty plasmid(EV), native promoter-phaCAB and hybrid promoter-phaCAB after plastic extraction. The EV does not produce P3HB while the hybrid produces much more than the native promoter.</b>]]
 |}
@@ Line 1,450: / Line 1,611: @@
        </div>
              <div id="CollapsiblePanel5" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0">Increasinf Bioplastic Production<b>[Click to Expand]</b></div>
+         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>Increasing Bioplastic Production      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
          <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
+<p>We converted the data into the format with which industry compares P3HB production. These are mass of plastic per dry biomass and mass of plastic per litre of culture media. The strain containing the hybrid promoter had a ten fold higher ratio of plastic to biomass than that produced by the original part BBa_K934001</p>
 {| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto;"
 |[[File:PHB_production_table.PNG|thumbnail|left|900px| <b>A summary of the improved production of P3HB by our hybrid promoter-phaCAB construct(BBa_K1149051) over the native promoter-phaCAB.</b>]]
 |}
+<p>Comparing the amount of plastic produced by the two constructs is visually striking.</p>
 {| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto;"
@@ Line 1,469: / Line 1,634: @@
        </div>
              <div id="CollapsiblePanel6" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0">Bioplastic from mixed waste   <b>[CLICK TO EXPAND]</b></div>
+         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>Bioplastic from mixed waste      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
          <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
-<h2>3HB Assay: Confirming production of 3HB</h2>
+<h2>P(3HB) From Mixed Waste</h2>
+E. coli (MG1655) transformed with native phaCAB (BBa_K934001) were grown with 600ml waste media (12g mixed waste in 600ml M9M- Minimal Media) overnight (16h) at 37oC with shaking. Prior to centrifugation large mixed waste chunks were filtered out. P(HB) was purified as described in [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/Protocols Protocols.]
+[[File:Purification_of_P(3HB).jpg|thumbnail|center|600px|<b>P(3HB) purification:</b> The diagram summaries the process of P(3HB) purification from E. coli (MG1655) transformed with native phaCAB (BBa_K934001)]]
+<p class="clear">See [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4msf6EMNIrY here] a video of the process.</p>
+<h2>3HB Assay: Confirming production of 3HB</h2>
+We have adapted a medical kit for 3HB detection for chemically analysing our samples. This provided a simple but accurate mean to measure the 3HB liberated from the polymer after phaZ1 depolymerase enzyme treatment. The monomer 3HB indicated the presence of P(3HB) in the material we purified from cells grown on waste as a sole carbon source. Please see the protocol [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/Protocols#3HB_assay here] and our data and calculations [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/3HB_assay here].
+<br>
 {| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto;"
-|[[File:743px-3HB_assay_from_PHB_másolata.jpg|thumbnail|left|600px| <b>The chemical analysis of the produced bioplastic. The samples break break down to 3HB monomers after treatment with our PhaZ1 enzyme (BBa_K1149010). We synthesised P(3HB) using our improved Biobrick part (hybrid promoter phaCAB, BBa_K1149051). Our engineered bioplastic producing <i>E.coli</i> synthesised P(3HB) directly from waste. Imperial iGEM data</b>]]
+|[[File:3HB_assay_from_PHB_new.jpg|thumbnail|left|600px| <b>The chemical analysis of the produced bioplastic. The samples break break down to 3HB monomers after treatment with our PhaZ1 enzyme (BBa_K1149010). We synthesised P(3HB) using our improved Biobrick part (hybrid promoter phaCAB, BBa_K1149051). Our engineered bioplastic producing <i>E.coli</i> synthesised P(3HB) directly from waste. (Imperial iGEM data [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/3HB_assay here].)</b>]]
 |}
-https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/d/d1/3HB_from_PHB_from_waste.jpg
+[[File:Imperial_P3HB_from_waste.jpg|thumbnail|centre|600px|<font size="2.7"><b>The bioplastic produced by our bacteria contains PHB and can be broken down into monomers by PhaZ1 enzyme (expressed by our bacteria)Imperial iGEM data.</b>]]
+<br>
+We repeated the previously described experiment with <i>E.coli</i> cells containing all three P(3HB) production operons, grown on waste media. We also also tested the material left after the extraction protocol from cells containing the Empty vector only, grown on waste media. The yellow colour indicates presence of 3HB.
+[[File:Full_annotated_diagram.jpg|thumbnail|centre|600px|<font size="2.7"><b>Production of PHB from waste confirmed. Imperial iGEM data.</b>]]
-Please see data [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/3HB_assay here].
 <html>
@@ Line 1,486: / Line 1,663: @@
        </div>
              <div id="CollapsiblePanel7" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0">Extras   <b>[CLICK TO EXPAND]</b></div>
+         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>Extras      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
          <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
@@ Line 1,504: / Line 1,681: @@
        </div>
              <div id="CollapsiblePanel8" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0">Protocols   <b>[CLICK TO EXPAND]</b></div>
+         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>Protocols      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
          <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 <h4>Waste Conditioned Media (WCM)</h4>
@@ Line 1,510: / Line 1,687: @@
 SRF refers to the refuse from recycling facilities that has no value currently and is incinerated to produce power at a cost to the recycling facility, it is composed of 30% plastics while the rest is cellulosic waste</p>
+<p class="clear">See here how we make up waste conditioned media and purify plastic from it.</p>
+<iframe width="840" height="630" src="//www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/1oXt_EfqmLU?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 <h4>Waste Growth Assay</h4>
@@ Line 1,523: / Line 1,705: @@
        </div>
              <div id="CollapsiblePanel9" class="CollapsiblePanel">
-         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0">Safety   <b>[CLICK TO EXPAND]</b></div>
+         <div class="CollapsiblePanelTab" tabindex="0"><h4>MSDS      </html><font size="1">&#9660;</font size="1"><html></h4></div>
          <div class="CollapsiblePanelContent">
 </html>
-<h5>Bacteria strains</h5>
-<p align="justify">We used <i>E. coli</i> K-12 strains MG1655, NEB 10 beta, NEB 5 alpha and TOP10 (similar to <i>E. coli</i> K-12 DH 10 beta  that fall under Risk Group 1 for the experiments, but eventually only MG1655 strain will be used in the bioreactors. This strain rarely survives outside laboratories, although minor symptoms may show if infected. Meanwhile, the parts we designed are specialised for degrading PUR and they should not harm human health.</p>
-<h5>Chemical reagents</h5>
 <p align="justify"> Some of the reagents we used were slightly toxic to human. In order to reduce the risks of using toxic reagents, we always wear gloves and labcoats. For some toxic reagents, we performed in fume cupboard. Click on the reagents to see the MSDS.</p>
 <p>1. [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=GB&language=en&productNumber=W222305&brand=ALDRICH&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Faldrich%2Fw222305%3Flang%3Den Tributyrin]</p>
@@ Line 1,537: / Line 1,715: @@
 <p> 4. [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/PleaseWaitMSDSPage.do?language=&country=GB&brand=SIGMA&productNumber=A3256&PageToGoToURL=http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/sigma/a3256?lang=en&region=GB Arabinose].</p>
 <p> 5. [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=GB&language=en&productNumber=N9876&brand=SIGMA&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Fsigma%2Fn9876%3Flang%3Den 4-Nitrophenyl butyrate].</p>
-<p> 6. [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=GB&language=en&productNumber=N8130&brand=SIGMA&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Fsigma%2Fn8130%3Flang%3Den 4-Nitrophenyl acetate].</p>
+<p> 6. [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=GB&language=en&productNumber=270717&brand=ALDRICH&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Faldrich%2F270717%3Flang%3Den Acetonitrile].</p>
 <p> 7. [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=GB&language=en&productNumber=S8511&brand=SIGMA&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Fsigma%2Fs8511%3Flang%3Den N-Succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Leu p-nitroanilide].</p>
 <p> 8. [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=GB&language=en&productNumber=L3126&brand=SIGMA&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Fsigma%2Fl3126%3Flang%3Den Lipase from porcine pancreas].</p>
@@ Line 1,553: / Line 1,731: @@
 </html>
-<p align="justify"> As seen in the [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/Western_Blots Western Blot]<html> results, some of the enzymes designed for secretion were not secreted. According many literatures, these proteins may have been attached to the periplasm and the secretion tag might not have been cleaved by peptidase. Thus we are optimise enzyme secretion by using our </html>[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149001 secretion toolkit]<html>.</p>
+<b>We are changing the pelB secretion tag to OsmY-fusion partner for better secretion</b>
+<p>As seen in the [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/Western_Blots Western Blot] results, some of the enzymes designed for secretion were not secreted. These proteins may have been stuck in the periplasmic space. Thus we are optimising enzyme secretion by building a new construct with OsmY [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K892008 BBa_K892008] fusion for secretion. OsmY is naturally secreted from <i>E.coli</i> and will carry our PUR esterase enzyme with. Once in the culture medium, we think that the enzyme is going to be functional in the fusion form but we included a TEV site in between the domains that can be cleaved by TEV protease if needed.</p>
+[[File:FuturePURbrick.jpg|400px|center]]
+The linker sequence we have designed between the domains is <b>T G S E N L Y F Q G S</b> (ACCGGCAGCGAGAACCTGTACTTCCAAGGCAGC) and includes the 7 amino acids of the TEV site as well as 4 other amino acids for flexibility.
+This construct will be a substitute for [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149002 BBa_K1149002] which is the PUR esterase EstCS2 with the pelB seretion tag.
+UPDATE 28-10-13:
+Whilst further optimisation is required a western blot analysis of our new construct OsmY-ESTC2 indicated that our enzyme maybe secreting into the supernatant.
+<b>We will test our Hybrid phaCAB within a bioreactor setup</b>
+We will inoculate a 15L bioreactor at Imperial College London to perform a pilot scale test of our plastic producing system.
+<html></p>
    </div>

Team:Imperial College/Waste Degradation: SRF

From 2013.igem.org

Latest revision as of 03:48, 29 October 2013

Module 1: Resource-full Waste

Overview

Specifications

Design

Modelling

Assembly

Testing & results

Future work

Separating polyurethane and selling its breakdown products

Using the residual material as a substrate for P(3HB) production

Specification

PUR Degradation: Pathway ▼

PUR Degradation: BioBrick Designs ▼

Bioplastic Synthesis: Pathway ▼

Bioplastic Synthesis: Biobrick Designs ▼

Chassis Design: Tolerance to Waste ▼

Enzyme Secretion Strategy ▼

Safety ▼

Modelling

What we learnt from the PUR degradation model:

What we learnt from the P(3HB) synthesis model:

1.0 Polyurethane (PUR) degradation model ▼

Introduction

Design

Objective

The Model

Parameters and assumptions

PUR degradation module

Secretion module

Simulation Results and Industrial Implementation

PUR degradation model:Download

2.0 P(3HB) synthesis model ▼

2.1 Ordinary Differential Equations ▼

Genetic regulations and expressions

BDH2 (3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase)

PhaB (Acetoacetyl-CoA reductase)and PhaC (P(3HB) synthase)

Values, sources and assumptions ▼

Derivations ▼

2.2 Enzyme kinetics ▼

BDH2 (3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase)

Values, sources and assumptions

atoAD (Acetyl-CoA:acetoacetyl-CoA transferase (α and β subunits))

Values, sources and assumptions

phaB (Acetoacetyl-CoA reductase)

Values, sources and assumptions

phaC (P(3HB) synthase)

Values, sources and assumptions

atoB (acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase)

Values, sources and assumptions

Reaction kinetics and mechanisms ▼

2.3 Simulation results ▼

2.4 Model-guided design and optimisation ▼

Sensitivity analysis: species concentrations

Sensitivity analysis: enzyme concentrations

Scan with different levels of PhaB

Difference between promoter expressions after optimisation

P(3HB) synthesis model:Download

Additional script:Download

2.5 Metabolic considerations ▼

Initial concentrations of metabolites

Assembling the optimised bioplastic producing operon

Partial sequence of the constitutive phaCAB construct ([http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149052 BBa_K1149052]):

Partial sequence of the hybrid phaCAB construct ([http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051 BBa_K1149051]):

Our chassis (MG1655) survives in mixed waste ▼

Waste media

Waste conditioned media

Mixed waste degradation: Polyurethane (PUR) ▼

PUR Esterase enzyme activity

Cell lysate assay

Mixed waste degradation: Toxicity ▼

Ethylene glycol

Bioplastic production ▼

Increasing Bioplastic Production ▼

Bioplastic from mixed waste ▼

P(3HB) From Mixed Waste

3HB Assay: Confirming production of 3HB

Extras ▼