Open Source Reflexion

We have organized three big meetings during this summer. During each meeting, we chose two problematics that one or two members of our team had to present. Among these problematics there was: what is opensource ? what are the rules that govern the opensource ? what is the influence of the open source in our economy ? ... After each presentation we debated, and we tried to hightlight the important points of each problematics, what we learned and what were the future questions we wanted to address.

First meeting : 25/06/2013

People present: Caroline, Anais, Eric, Nima, Zhou, Gabriel and Nadia

This meeting was our first contact with the concept of Open Source applied to synthetic biology and with the impact of Open Source in our economy.

Global presentation of the Open Source

First, Anais and Gabriel made a global presentation of the Open Source, what is it, how it works.(paper)

Thanks to this presentation, we have learned about the difference between free software and Open Source, and about the conditions of OSI. These definitions gave us the basis to raise some questions :

- What comparisons can we make beetween the software's world (and its concept of OpenSource) and synthetic biology's world that tries to apply the Open Source.

- Between free software and open source, towards what way synbiology heads ?

- What is the impact or the role of the community on the type of model adopted ?

- The researches in synbiology and biotechnologies are they adapted to the Open source (and vis versa) ?

Bioeconomy and open source

Second, Eric made a presentation of the state of bioeconomy today (power point)

Thanks to his presentation, we have learned about the Moore's laws and the impact of the open source on brevets and firms. We raised some questions about this impact :

- Can brevets and OpenSource exist together without killing the monopoly of big firms ?

-

Second meeting : 02/07/2013

People there: Caroline, Anais, Eric, Nima, Zouh, Gabriel, Damir

Rules and Free Software

Zhou made a presentation about the rules of the open source and the different kind of free software in computer science. (Paper)

Zhou presentation.

Thanks to his presentation we have highlight the positive and negative points of free software :

Some advantages :

1. Low initial capital. Don’t need to paid license and fee for upgrade

2. Avoid the dependence on a single supplier. This means the enterprise can choose the service which have a high quality-price 3. Obtain the technology As code source is available for everyone, the developers learn important skills

4. Efficient system. Everyone can see you work, for some developer, soft must be perfect for the publication, which leads usually some high quality product

5. Independence Community runs without much income

Disadvantage: 1. Do not pay enough attention to the user experience in some project

2. much imitate

3. Hard to have an ecosystem

4. Independence. The project dies if some key developer change the subject

5. High running cost. Not always free The source code may modify by any user so there are too many version. The upgrade of open source software is not include all the modification which the user has made.

If some users are distracted by something else, a dead community is worth than closed company Open source software is not safer than those closed software. The security is depend on the software upgrade and the people who utilize the software No professional technic support. And the responsibility is not clear at all.

The democratization of sciences

Damir made a presentation about the development and the democratization of science thanks to the open source (PowerPoint)

Thanks to his presentation we have better understood the extent and the impact of open source (in science) in our society. An important "made it by yourselve" movement is emerging, and this movement impacts our society and the way it was organized before. The questions we wanted to highlight here are :

- Can we imagine in few years the death of big manufacturing firms? Because people could make by themselves objects they need.

- What are the risks of this democratisation ? Can we let everybody make synthetic biology ? What king of measures the gouvernment can take to limit these ricks without lead to a dictatorship ?

Thrird meeting : 09/07/13

People there : Caroline, Anais, Eric, Zouh, Damir

Eric made a presentation about the bioterrorism (powerpoint)

Thanks to this presentation, we noticed that the origins of bioterrorism are diverse, it could be a sect, a party, one person or an entire group.