Team:UFMG Brazil/humanpractice
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→BiOS) |
(→The Brickard Game) |
||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
Each group of players receive a mission alongside the deck, with an explanatory text regarding a problem they have to solve combining the cards, just like we do (with the real stuff!) in our lab. | Each group of players receive a mission alongside the deck, with an explanatory text regarding a problem they have to solve combining the cards, just like we do (with the real stuff!) in our lab. | ||
The missions were priority based on projects from past iGEM participations. They were: | The missions were priority based on projects from past iGEM participations. They were: | ||
- | #'''Mission:'''Fuel from sunlight | + | #'''Mission:''' Fuel from sunlight |
- | #'''Mission:'''Microplastic | + | #'''Mission:''' Microplastic |
- | #'''Mission:'''Spoiled meat | + | #'''Mission:''' Spoiled meat |
- | #'''Mission:'''Malaria and artemisin | + | #'''Mission:''' Malaria and artemisin |
- | #'''Mission:'''Celic disease | + | #'''Mission:''' Celic disease |
- | #'''Mission:'''Space exploration | + | #'''Mission:''' Space exploration |
#'''Mission:''' Our own project! | #'''Mission:''' Our own project! | ||
To simulate difficulties faced on real experiments, there were incompatibilities among some cards. Promoter and terminator cards were classified according to an arbitrary force from 1 to 5 (represented by the number of full colored stars on cards), suggesting that different sequences present different affinities and, so, act on transcription on different ways. Thus, weak promoters could just be used with strong terminators, and constitutive promoters must join weak terminators following precise indications on each card description. Some options of chassis may apply, but the real possibility of their use should be justified; besides, each chassis must be combined with a specific RBS (bacteria with bacteria RBS, yeast with yeast RBS and so on), pointing the existence of molecular patterns that turn a sequence specific to a certain organism. Finally, the coding region cards included a sort of key genes to solve the problems proposed; the gene originally used by the related iGEM team was our expectation for each mission, but we were open to new creative, wellsupported devices students might present. | To simulate difficulties faced on real experiments, there were incompatibilities among some cards. Promoter and terminator cards were classified according to an arbitrary force from 1 to 5 (represented by the number of full colored stars on cards), suggesting that different sequences present different affinities and, so, act on transcription on different ways. Thus, weak promoters could just be used with strong terminators, and constitutive promoters must join weak terminators following precise indications on each card description. Some options of chassis may apply, but the real possibility of their use should be justified; besides, each chassis must be combined with a specific RBS (bacteria with bacteria RBS, yeast with yeast RBS and so on), pointing the existence of molecular patterns that turn a sequence specific to a certain organism. Finally, the coding region cards included a sort of key genes to solve the problems proposed; the gene originally used by the related iGEM team was our expectation for each mission, but we were open to new creative, wellsupported devices students might present. |
Revision as of 21:35, 27 September 2013