Team:UFMG Brazil/Cardbio
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Our Design) |
(→Our Design) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Our Design= | =Our Design= | ||
- | After an extensive research on the biomarkers used for prognosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), we elected three that we could work on to somehow make our bacteria detect: TMAO | + | After an extensive research on the biomarkers used for prognosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), we elected three that we could work on to somehow make our bacteria detect: IMA TMAO and BNP. |
+ | |||
+ | IMA, which means Ischemia Modified Albumin, was a tricky one. Our studies indicated that, although a good marker for ischemia, IMA could be better used for ACS prognostic as a negative predictor than a positive one. Because of that, we assigned YFP to its detection: its presence doesn’t really say much, it’s a “warning”. We found out that a clinical test for IMA was available, based on the detection of cobalt added to a patient’s blood serum (the reason being that IMA binds less cobalt than normal human serum albumin); so, we decided to incorporate this method by using a cobalt-inducible promoter, Rcna (BBa_K540001) associated with the YFP translational unit (BBa_E0430). With this construction, if cobalt is added to a medium containing our chassis and a patient’s blood, and it remains unbinded due to the presence of IMA, it will activate the promoter, which will lead to the production of YFP. | ||
+ | TMAO is a biomarker that was recently linked to heart diseases, and one that our literature research showed that could activate an inducible bacterial promoter, part of the TorCAD operon. Since this promoter was not deposited in the Parts Registry, we ordered it to be synthesized, with modifications to its structure to enhance its activity [1]. The sequence of the promoter we ordered was: | ||
+ | |||
<center> | <center> | ||
5’ – CGAACGAATTCGCGGCCGCTTCTAGAGATTCTGTTCATATCTGTTCATATTCCGTTCATCCT | 5’ – CGAACGAATTCGCGGCCGCTTCTAGAGATTCTGTTCATATCTGTTCATATTCCGTTCATCCT | ||
Line 25: | Line 29: | ||
GACCAGTGCCGCTGTTCATATTTGCTCATTAAGATCGCTTCATACTAGTAGCGGCCGCTGCAG – 3’ | GACCAGTGCCGCTGTTCATATTTGCTCATTAAGATCGCTTCATACTAGTAGCGGCCGCTGCAG – 3’ | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
- | We decided to assign RFP to this biomarker, and thus our construction for this became the TorCAD promoter we had synthesized | + | |
+ | We decided to assign RFP to this biomarker, and thus our construction for this became the TorCAD promoter we had synthesized followed by the RFP translational unit (BBa_J06702). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Our last target is BNP (Brain Natriuretic Peptide), a major prognostic biomarker for ACS. To detect it, we tried to synthesize a biobrick containing the coding region of NPRA, a receptor capable of detecting BNP and respond unleashing an intracellular cGMP cascade. And to detect the cGMP produced by the receptor, we also ordered the synthesis of another promoter, belonging to PDE5 (phosphodiesterase 5), which is positively regulated by this molecule. Putting it all together, the plan was to create a plasmid containing two constructions: 1) a constitutive promoter associated with the translation unit of NPRA, to make our bacteria detect BNP and respond producing cGMP, and 2) PDE5 promoter associated with the translational unit of another fluorescent protein, like CFP, to make our bacteria produce a signal when the biomarker was detected. However, we were unable to proceed with the detection of BNP, due to the high content of CG pairs on both the NPRA receptor and PDE5 promoter, which rendered their synthesis impossible. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thus, by inserting all of these inside our Escherichia coli, we’d have in our hands our heart vigilant bacteria, ready to save some lives! | ||
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/5/56/Cardbio_design.jpg | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/5/56/Cardbio_design.jpg |
Revision as of 13:42, 27 September 2013