Open Source Reflexion

We have organized three big meetings during this summer. During each meeting, we chose two problematics that one or two members of our team had to present. Among these problematics there was: what is opensource ? what are the rules that govern the opensource ? what is the influence of the open source in our economy ? ... After each presentation we debated, and we tried to hightlight the important points of each problematics, what we learned and what were the future questions we wanted to address.

First meeting : 25/06/2013

People present: Caroline, Anais, Eric, Nima, Zhou, Gabriel and Nadia

This meeting was our first contact with the concept of Open Source applied to synthetic biology and with the impact of Open Source in our economy.

Introduction to Open Source

First, Anais and Gabriel introduced us to the Open Source philosophy, its nature and its principles.(paper)

Thanks to this presentation, we learned about the definition of the open source and its story. Indeed an opensource software has to respond to three criteria : free redistribution, source code access and creation of derive software based on the original. In 1998, Eric S. Raymond creates with Bruce Perens the Open Source Initiative(OSI) in order to developp the open source ideolgy in the software community. At the end of this first presentation we debated about several questions

- Can we compare the software's world (and its concept of OpenSource) and the synthetic biology's world that tries to apply the Open Source?

- Can we imagine the science of synthetic biology only based on open source ?

- The researches in synbiology and biotechnologies are they adapted to the Open source (and vice versa) ?

Bioeconomy and open source

Second, Eric made a presentation of the state of bioeconomy today (power point)

Thanks to his presentation, we learned about the Moore's laws and the impact of the open source on patents and firms. We raised some questions about this impact :

- Can patents and OpenSource co-exist without killing the monopoly of big firms ?

Second meeting : 02/07/2013

People present: Caroline, Anais, Eric, Nima, Zhou, Gabriel, Damir

Rules and Free Software

Zhou made a presentation about the rules of the open source, the different kind of free software in computer science, and the comparaison between computer science and biology.

Zhou presentation.

In the igem, the concept of open source is quite similar to the open source definition. First, biobricks (we can compare to software) can be modified and put again on the "igem market", then the code source of the biobricks is available (we have standart parts, with clear description of the composition of the biobricks), and to finish every team have access to these biobricks : free redistribution. But the consequences are quite different, because we manipulate the living and not just made-man softwares.

After his presentation, we discussed the positive and negative points of the adaptation of ope source in biology :

Some advantages : - Open source can boost the "avancée" of synthetic biology, because not just biologists in laboratories can experiment and developp interristing projects - The monopoly of big firms can stop - This new technology can touch everybody and become a common tool of our daily life (we can imagine lighting trees as the cambridge project)

Disadvantage: - not anough control, people can modified bacteria in their garage - we do not know the consequences of an accidental proliferation - bioterrism can quickly expend because of the share of information on the internet

The democratization of sciences

Damir made a presentation about the development and the democratization of science thanks to the open source (PowerPoint)

Thanks to his presentation we have better understood the extent and the impact of open source (in science) in our society. An important "made it by yourselve" movement is emerging, and this movement impacts our society and the way it was organized before. The questions we wanted to highlight here are :

- Can we imagine in few years the death of big manufacturing firms? Because people could make by themselves objects they need.

- What are the risks of this democratisation ? Can we let everybody make synthetic biology ? What king of measures the gouvernment can take to limit these ricks without lead to a dictatorship ?

Third meeting : 09/07/13

People there : Caroline, Anais, Eric, Zhou, Damir

Eric made a presentation about the bioterrorism (powerpoint)

Thanks to this presentation, we learned that the origins of bioterrorism can be diverse, it could be a sect, a political party, one person or an entire group.