Team:Duke/Modeling/1

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Mathematical Modeling of Bistable Toggle Switch)
(Mathematical Modeling of Bistable Toggle Switch)
Line 5: Line 5:
= '''Mathematical Modeling of Bistable Toggle Switch''' =
= '''Mathematical Modeling of Bistable Toggle Switch''' =
-
 
+
In addition to our experimental efforts, we have developed extensive mathematical models in two different approaches to aid the development of a successful toggle switch in <i>S.cerevisiae</i>. First, a thermodynamic approach was used to model cooperative repression of a gene with multiple repressor binding sites. Using a parameter called <i>P<sub>bound</sub></i>, we have demonstrated how the probability of RNA polymerase bound to promoter of gene depends on various characteristics of the gene. Then, we used our results from thermodynamic model to develop a novel kinetic model that expresses the rate of expression of two mutually repressive genes using the <i>P<sub>bound</sub></i> parameter. We have used graph of nullclines to confirm that this approach models a bistable system. In addition, bifurcation diagrams were generated for several combinations of parameters to see the effect of each parameter on the stability of the toggle switch system. Before we proceed, important concepts used in our models are explained below. <br><br><br>
-
Therefore, we have demonstrated the effect of various parameters on the bifurcation regions for a set of two mutually repressive genes. Our results show how the bifurcation decreases with decreasing promoter strength, weaker binding, and leakier promoter; these results consequently suggest the range of possible values for the dissociation constants of the two repressors that can lead to bistability. From the results of both thermodynamic model and the kinetic model, we now have a theoretical guide to constructing a genetic toggle switch; a guide that can be used to couple two genes that have the optimal combination of cooperativity, number of binding sites, binding strengths, promoter strengths and leakiness.
+
== Cooperativity ==
== Cooperativity ==

Revision as of 04:22, 24 September 2013

  • 1 1
  • 2 2
  • 3 3
  • 4 4
  • 5 5
  • 6 6
  • 7 7
  • 8 8
  • 9 9
  • 10 10


Contents

Mathematical Modeling of Bistable Toggle Switch

In addition to our experimental efforts, we have developed extensive mathematical models in two different approaches to aid the development of a successful toggle switch in S.cerevisiae. First, a thermodynamic approach was used to model cooperative repression of a gene with multiple repressor binding sites. Using a parameter called Pbound, we have demonstrated how the probability of RNA polymerase bound to promoter of gene depends on various characteristics of the gene. Then, we used our results from thermodynamic model to develop a novel kinetic model that expresses the rate of expression of two mutually repressive genes using the Pbound parameter. We have used graph of nullclines to confirm that this approach models a bistable system. In addition, bifurcation diagrams were generated for several combinations of parameters to see the effect of each parameter on the stability of the toggle switch system. Before we proceed, important concepts used in our models are explained below.


Cooperativity

Cooperativity is a common phenomenon in biological systems involving multiple ligands binding to enzymes or receptors. The change in affinity of a binding site for a ligand upon a ligand-binding leads to either positive cooperativity in which affinity is increased and subsequent binding become more likely, or negative cooperativity in which affinity is decreased to hinder future binding. One of the most famous examples of cooperative binding is the binding of oxygen to hemoglobin, the oxygen-transporting protein in red blood cells. When an oxygen molecule bind to hemoglobin, its affinity for oxygen increases greatly, and when three oxygen molecules bind (3-oxy-hemoglobin), its affinity for the fourth one is nearly three-hundred times higher than deoxy-hemoglobin’s affinity for oxygen. This cooperative property leads to the sigmoidal shaped curve shown below.

Cooperativity.png
Figure 1. Cooperativity of Hemoglobin


It has been shown by both mathematical derivation and experimental data that proteins which form multimers have cooperativity (Phillips et al, 2012). A transcriptional repressor of the lac operon, lacI proteins form tetramers and show cooperative repression of transcription. Similarly, tetracycline repressor (tetR) found in E.coli form dimers, and as a result show cooperativity. Professors Hermann Bujard and Manfred Gossen at University of Heidelberg developed a synthetic transcription factor called Tet-On and Tet-Off using this naturally found tetR respressor (Gossen, 1992). By fusing VP16 activator found in Herpes Simplex Virus with tetR, they made synthetic repressors (tetracycline transactivator, tTA) that could target specific locations named TetO operator sequences.

In addition to multimerization, combinatorial promoter binding has been shown to generate cooperativity (Murphy et al, 2007). Having multiple operator sites for both inducers and repressors produced cooperative response and it is this design that we chose to use in our project (with multiple binding sites for iTALs and CRISPR-Cas9). Cooperativity of repressors with multiple binding sites will be further explored in our mathematical models.


Hill Equation

Named after English physiologist Archibald Vivian Hill who studied the sigmoidal binding curve of hemoglobin, the Hill Equation provides a way to quantify cooperativity. The equation describes the fraction of proteins or enzymes that are saturated by ligands as a function of the concentration of ligands.

Hill Equation.png

Figure 2. Hill Equation (Induction)


In the Hill Equation shown above, theta represents the fraction of binding sites occupied by ligands, [L] is the ligand concentration, n is the Hill coefficient, and Kd is the dissociation constant of the ligand. The value of the Hill coefficient describes the cooperativity of ligand binding: n>1 for positive cooperativity, n<1 for negative cooperativity and n=0 for no cooperativity. The above equation can also be applied to cooperative induction or activation of transcription, where theta represents the level of mRNA produced and [L] represents the level of inducer present. More cooperative the activation is, the steeper the slope will be, and the expression of the gene becomes more switch-like with distinct on-and-off states without intermediate states. Shown below is the graph the of Hill equation with various Hill coefficients. As one can see, increasing the Hill coefficient makes the change (induction) more abrupt and switch-like.

Hill Graph.png

Figure 3. Graph of Hill Equation (Induction)

Similarly, mathematical derivation of a system with repressors that cooperatively repress a gene expression can be modeled by the following equation shown below. Again, Theta represents the level of transcribed mRNA, and [L] represents the level of repressors present. The graph of the above equation is shown as well. Similar to the previous graph, the level of transcription switches more abruptly with higher cooperativity (higher Hill coefficient). Therefore, as shown in both cases, high cooperativity lead to switch-like behavior and is favorable when designing a bistable toggle switch.

Hill Equation1.png

Figure 4. Hill Equation (Repression)


Hill Graph2.png
Figure 5. Graph of the Hill Equation (Repression)






References

  1. Phillips R, Kondev J, Theriot J, Garcia H: Physical Biology of the Cell. Taylor & Francis; 2012.
  2. Gossen M, Bujard H: Tight Control of Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells by Tetracycline-Responsive Promoters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992, 89(12):5547–51.
  3. Murphy K.F., Balazsi G., Collins J.J.: Combinatorial promoter design for engineering noisy gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007, 104:pp. 12726–12731