Team:Freiburg/Notebook/lab hormon

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)

Latest revision as of 05:16, 28 October 2013

Effector Control - Hormone

Planned constructs

Practical work: Localization

April

17.04.2013

Trafo of pMZ333

pMZ333 containing mCherry and the backbone (Bb)

18.04.2013

Picking of clones

3 colonies of pMItom (containing ERT2) and 1 of pMZ333.

19.04.2013

Minipreps of pMZ333 and pMItom

Yield: 100 - 300 ng/µl

23.04.2013

Digestion of pMZ333

Bb was cut out of pMZ333 by XbaI and EcoRI.

Gel run

0,7 % agarose, marker: GeneRuler 1 kb

From left to right: Marker - Test digestion of pMItom - xx - Digestion of pMZ333 (3x)

The bands of the test digestion were as exspected.
pMZ333 was cut in two fragments, where the shorter one is the Bb (lower band).

Gel extraction

Bb was purified.
Yield: 20 - 30 ng/µl

25.04.2013

PCR of aIG3001 and aIG3006-8

Gel run

0,9 % agarose, marker: GeneRuler 1 kb

From left to right: Marker - xx - aIG3001 - aIG3006 - aIG3007 - aIG3008

All PCR products (the bright bands) had the exspected length.

Gel extraction

PCR products were purified.
Yield: 30 - 90 ng/µl

May

03.05.2013

PCR of aIG3002-5

Mix:

ingredient	volume
Template	1 µl
Primers (10 µM)	each 2.5 µl
Q5-HF MasterMix (NEB) 2x	25 µl
dH₂O	up to 50 µl

Gel run

0,9 % agarose, marker: GeneRuler 1 kb

From left to right: aIG3002 - aIG3004 - aIG3003 - aIG3005 - xx - Marker

All PCR products (the bright bands) had the exspected length.

Gel extraction

PCR products were purified with the following changes to the standard protocol:

After the first incubation, the samples were vortexed followed by another incubation for 2 min at 50°C.
Between the centrifugations after PE buffer incubation the epis were turned around for 180°.
After 13 min incubation with water, samples were incubated for 4 min at 55°C.

Yield: 100 - 140 ng/µl

06.05.2013

Gibson assembly

Pipetting scheme:

to each symple 1 µl water was added

For pIG3005 and pIG3007 I used only the half amount of DNA as otherwise the total volume would have been higher than 5 µl.

Gibson assembly was performed by the following protocol:

5 µl of DNA mixes were added to 15 µl of Gibson master mix, each.
Incubation for 1 h at 50°C
Incubation for 3 min at RT
Incubation for 10 min on ice

Trafo

4 µl of each assemblies were added to 25 µl of chemically competent E. coli cells
incubation for 13 min on ice
heatshock (42 °C for 45 s)
incubation for 2 min on ice
addition of 500 µl LB medium
incubation for 15 min at 37 °C (shaking)
20 µl, 200 µl and 300 µl (concentrated) were distributed on agar plates with ampicilline
incubation over night at 37 °C

07.05.2013

Trafo repeat

As there were very few colonies only on the 300 µl plates which were surrounded by "satellite colonies", transformation was repeated by using the same protocol exept of:

The first incubation at 37°C was 1:15 h.
Only 300 µl (not concentrated) were distributed.
Over night incubation lasted only 16 h.

08.05.2013

Picking of clones

Colonies from plates pIG3001-8 (exept of pIG3006, because there were no colonies) of trafo repeat were spread on new agar plates.
Colonies of the first gibson trafo hopefully containing pIG3003,5,6 were spread on new plates to get single colonies.

09.05.2013

Picking of clones

Single colonies of the first gibson trafo were spread on new agar plates.

Minipreps of the second gibson trafo

Yield: 40 - 350 µg/ml

Test digest of gibson constructs

ingredient	volume
plasmid	approx. 1 µg
NcoI HF	0.5 µl
NEB buffer 4	2 µl
dH₂O	up to 20 µl

Incabation at 37 °C for 2.5 h.

10.05.2013

Gel run of test digest

1 % agarose, marker: GeneRuler 1 kb

From left to right: pIG300..,Colony:
1,1 - 1,2 - 1,3 - 1,4 - 2,1 - 2,2 - Marker - 2,3 - 3,1 - 4,1 - 4,2 - 4,3 - 4,4

From left to right: pIG300..,Colony:
xx - 5,1 - 7,1 - 7,2 - 7,3 - 7,4 - Marker - 8,1 - 8,2 - 8,3 - 8,4

The banding pattern of pIG3001 (all colonies); 2,1; 2,2; 4,1; 4,2; 4,4 and 8 (all colonies) has been proven to be the expected one by sequencing the linkers. Thus, the marker run has to be wrong.

Minipreps of the first gibson trafo

Changes:

Between the second washing step (centrifugation for 30 s) and the drying step (centrifugation for 1 min) the collection tube was changed.
The incubation with water took only 3 min.

Yield: 40 - 180 ng/µl

Test digest of gibson constructs

ingredient	volume
plasmid	approx. 1 µg
NcoI HF	0.3 µl
NEB buffer 4	2 µl
dH₂O	up to 20 µl

Incabation at 37 °C for 1:45 h.

Gel run of second test digest

1 % agarose, marker: GeneRuler 1 kb

From left to right: pIG300..,Colony:
xx - 3,1 - 3,2 - 5,1 - Marker - 5,2 - 6,1 - 6,2 - xx - xx

The banding pattern of pIG3003 has been proven to be the expected one by sequencing the linkers. Like above the marker ran wrong.

14.05.2013

Fusion PCR of aIG3009 & 10

aIG3005 & 6 were fused to aIG3009, aIG3007 & 8 to aIG3010 in order to reduce the fragments for Gibson assembly.

Mix:

ingredient	volume
Templates	each 1 µl
Q5 polymerase	0.3 µl
Q5 buffer (5x)	10 µl
dNTPs (2.5 mM)	4 µl
DMSO	1 µl
dH₂O	up to 45 µl

Program A:

temperature	time
98 °C	5 min
98 °C	30 s
**	30 s
72 °C	*

Step 2 - 4 were repeated for 5 times.
* time calculation: size template [kb] x 30 s
** 72 °C - 0,5 per cycle for aIG3009; 69 °C - 0,5 per cycle for aIG3010

Program B (after addition of 2,5 µl Primers, each):

temperature	time
98 °C	5 min
98 °C	30 s
63 °C	30 s
72 °C	*
72 °C	10 min

Step 2 - 4 were repeated for 5 times.
* time calculation: size template [kb] x 30 s

Gel run of fusion PCR

Fragment´s lengths were as expected, though the band of aIG3009 was very slight.

15.05.2013

Gel extraction of fusion PCR

PCR products were purified as described on 03.05.2013, but DNA solution was loaded on the column again.
Yield: 6 / 49 ng/µl

16.05.2013

PCR of aIG3006 (repeat)

This PCR was repeated as the concentration yielded from the first attempt is too low for Gibson assembly.

21.05.2013

Repeat of fusion PCR of aIG3009

Fusion PCR was repeated, as the concentration of the first attempt is too low for Gibson assembly.

Gel run of PCR of aIG3006 and fusion PCR of aIG3009

Gel did not show the desired bands.

Gibson assembly 2

Pipetting scheme:

For pIG3005 and pIG3007 only the half amount of each PCR product was used as the concentration of aIG3006 was very low.

The volumes were calculated that 5 µl contain the required DNA amount.

Gibson assembly was performed by the following protocol:

5 µl of DNA mixes were added to 15 µl of Gibson master mix, each.
Incubation for 1 h at 50°C
Incubation for 3 min at RT
Incubation for 10 min on ice

Trafo

4 µl of each assemblies were added to 25 µl of chemically competent E. coli cells
incubation for 13 min on ice
heatshock (42 °C for 45 s)
incubation for 2 min on ice
addition of 500 µl LB medium
incubation for 15 min at 37 °C (shaking)
20 µl, 200 µl and 300 µl (concentrated) were distributed on agar plates with ampicilline
incubation over night at 37 °C

22.05.2013

Midiprep of pIG3003, 4 & 8

As the sequencing results were positive, plasmids were amplified and midiprepped according to the manual of Jetstar Plasmid Purification MIDI Kit

Yield: ~ 1 µg/µl for pIG3004 & 8; no DNA was isolated for pIG3003.

23.05.2013

Miniprep of Gibson assembly 2

DNA was purified using High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit of Roche.

Yield: 30 - 90 ng/µl

Test digest of Gibson assembly 2

Mix 1 was used for DNA concentrations beneath 60 ng/µl, Mix 2 for concentrations above 60 ng/µl.

ingredient	mix 1	mix 2
plasmid	17.5 µl	10 µl
NcoI HF	0.2 µl	0.2 µl
NEB buffer 4	2 µl	2 µl
dH₂O	up to 20 µl	up to 20 µl

Incabation at 37 °C for 1.5 h.

24.05.2013

Gel run

From left to right: Marker (GeneRuler 1 kb); pIG3001 (4x); pIG3006 (4x); pIG3007 (4x).

The bands of pIG3001 & 6 could be at the right size, so they were send in for sequencing.

27.05.2013

Amplification of aIG3006 & 9 by PCR

Mix:

ingredient	volume
aIG3006 / 9	5 µl
Primers (10 µM)	each 1 µl
Q5 DNA polymerase	0.5 µl
Q5 buffer	10 µl
DMSO	1 µl
dNTPs (2.5 mM)	4 µl
dH₂O	up to 50 µl

Program:

temperature	time
98 °C	5 min
98 °C	30 s
63 °C	30 s
72 °C	160 s
72 °C	10 min

Step 2 - 4 were repeated for 18 times.

Yield after Gel extraction with High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit of Roche: 40 ng/µl for aIG3006 and 82 ng/µl for aIG3009.

28.05.2013

Gibson assembly 3

Pipetting scheme:

For pIG3005 and pIG3007 only the half amount of each PCR product was used as the concentration of aIG3006 was very low.

5 µl of each DNA mix was added to 15 µl Gibson master mix.

Gibson assembly was performed by the following protocol:

5 µl of DNA mixes were added to 15 µl of Gibson master mix, each.
Incubation for 1 h at 50°C
Incubation for 3 min at RT
Incubation for 10 min on ice

Trafo

4 µl of each assemblies were added to 25 µl of chemically competent E. coli cells
incubation for 13 min on ice
heatshock (42 °C for 45 s)
incubation for 2 min on ice
addition of 500 µl LB medium
incubation for 15 min at 37 °C (shaking)
20 µl, 200 µl and 300 µl (concentrated) were distributed on agar plates with ampicilline
incubation over night at 37 °C

Transfection of pIG3004 and pIG3008

0.75 ng of DNA per well were filled up to 50 µl with OptiMEM
2.5 µl of PEI per well were filled up to 50 µl with OptiMEM

These two solutions were mixed by immediately 2x vortexing for ~ 5 s. After 20 min incubation 100 µl were added dropwise to each well.

Medium change was performed after 2 h.

28.05.2013

Cell fixation

Cells on each well were washed with 500 µl PBS and fixed with 200 µl PFA (4 %) solution by incubating for 10 min on ice and at least 20 min at RT.
Cells attached on cover slides were stained with DAPI and DRAQ5 (incubation in DAPI or DRAQ5 solution consisting of 1 µl DAPI or DRAQ5 in 5 ml dH2O for 5 s, respectively) and rinsed in dH2O. Cover slides were dried and mounted on a drop of Mowiol solution (with DABCO) with cells down. After a drying step at 37 °C for 15 min samples were sealed with nail polish and stored at 4 °C.

Flourescence microscopy

pIG3004

pIG3008

These pictures show that pIG3004 is clearly localized in the nucleus whereas pIG3008 is localized in the cytoplasm. Nevertheless more cells have to be analyzed.

30.05.2013

Midiprep of pIG3001, 3 & 6

As the sequencing results were positive, plasmids were amplified and midiprepped according to the manual of Jetstar Plasmid Purification MIDI Kit

Yield: 1.4 µg/µl for pIG3006; 470 ng/µl for pIG3001; 71 ng/µl for pIG3003.

Test digest of Gibson assembly 3

ingredient	volumes
plasmid (~ 100 ng/µl)	5 µl
NcoI HF	0.2 µl
NEB buffer 4	2 µl
dH₂O	up to 20 µl

Incabation at 37 °C for 2.5 h.

31.05.2013

Gel run

From left to right: Marker (GeneRuler 1 kb); pIG3002 (3x); pIG3005₂ (3x); pIG3007 (3x).

The bands of pIG3002, 5 & 7-a were at the right size, so they were send in for sequencing.

June

04.06.2013

Transfection of pIG3001, 3, 4, 6 & 8

HeLa cells seeded onto cover slides in a 24 well plate were transfected by the following protocol:

0.75 ng of DNA per well were filled up to 50 µl with OptiMEM
2.5 µl of PEI per well were filled up to 50 µl with OptiMEM

These two solutions were mixed by immediately 2x vortexing for ~ 5 s. After 20 min incubation 100 µl were added dropwise to each well.

Transfection scheme:

05.06.2013

Second Miniprep of Gibson assembly 3

As the sequencing of the only positive colony of pIG3007 pointed out a mutation, more colonies were prepped using High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit of Roche.

Yield: ~ 60 ng/µl

Second test digest of Gibson assembly 3

ingredient	volumes
plasmid (~ 60 ng/µl)	10 µl
NcoI HF	0.5 µl
NEB buffer 4	2 µl
dH₂O	up to 20 µl

Incabation at 37 °C for 2.5 h.

Gel run

From left to right: Marker (GeneRuler 1 kb); pIG3007 (3x).

The bands were at the right size, so pIG3007 was send in for sequencing.

06.06.2013

4-OHT treatment

4-OHT was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 0.1, 1 and 10 µM; EtOH was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 0.1 and 1 % (which is the same amount as in the medium with 4-OHT, as 4-OHT is dissolved in EtOH).

The old medium was removed from the cells and the new mixed media were added according to the transfection scheme.

Cell fixation

After 0.5, 1 and 3 h (according to the transfection scheme) cells on each well were washed with 500 µl PBS and fixed with 200 µl PFA (4 %) solution by incubating for 10 min on ice and at least 20 min at RT.
Cells attached on cover slides were stained with DAPI and DRAQ5 (incubation in DAPI or DRAQ5 solution consisting of 1 µl DAPI or DRAQ5 in 5 ml dH2O for 5 s, respectively) and rinsed in dH2O. Cover slides were dried and mounted on a drop of Mowiol solution (with DABCO) with cells down. After a drying step at 37 °C for 15 min samples were sealed with nail polish and stored at 4 °C.

Midiprep of pIG3002, 3, 5 & 7

As the sequencing results were positive, plasmids were amplified and midiprepped according to the manual of Jetstar Plasmid Purification MIDI Kit

Yield: 1.7 µg/µl for pIG3005; 670 ng/µl for pIG3007; 540 ng/µl for pIG3002; 335 ng/µl for pIG3003.

07.06.2013

Microscopy

All samples showed red flourescence (except of pIG3006 & 8 treated with 10 µM 4-OHT, as there were almost no cells).
Treatment with 0.1 µM 4-OHT did not cause a difference to treatment with EtOH.
Treatment with 1 µM 4-OHT seemed to increase nuclear import for pIG3006 & 8.
pIG3006 is always localized in the nucleus.
By cell shape concentrations of 4-OHT lower than 10 µM does not seem to harm HeLa cells.

10.06.2013

Midiprep of pIG3009

As experimental results indicate, that the 5' NLS has a maybe stronger influence on nuclear import than the 3' NLS, the wrong assembled plasmid with the insert HA-ERT2-NLS-Cas9-mCherry (:= pIG3009) was amplified and midiprepped according to the manual of Jetstar Plasmid Purification MIDI Kit

Yield: 300 ng/µl.

11.06.2013

Transfection of all constructs

HeLa cells seeded onto cover slides in a 24 well plate were transfected by the following protocol:

0.75 ng of DNA per well were filled up to 50 µl with OptiMEM
2.5 µl of PEI per well were filled up to 50 µl with OptiMEM

These two solutions were mixed by immediately 2x vortexing for ~ 5 s. After 20 min incubation 100 µl were added dropwise to each well.

Transfection scheme:

12.06.2013

4-OHT treatment

4-OHT was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 0.1 and 1 µM; EtOH was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 0.1 % (which is the same amount as in the medium with 4-OHT, as 4-OHT is dissolved in EtOH).

31 h after transfection the old medium was removed from the cells and the new mixed media were added according to the transfection scheme.

Cell fixation

After 3 and 16 h (according to the transfection scheme) cells on each well were washed with 500 µl PBS and fixed with 200 µl PFA (4 %) solution by incubating for 10 min on ice and at least 20 min at RT.
Cells attached on cover slides were stained with DAPI and DRAQ5 (incubation in DAPI or DRAQ5 solution consisting of 1 µl DAPI or DRAQ5 in 5 ml dH2O for 5 s, respectively) and rinsed in dH2O. Cover slides were dried and mounted on a drop of Mowiol solution (with DABCO) with cells down. After a drying step at 37 °C for 15 min samples were sealed with nail polish and stored at 4 °C.

13.06.2013

Toxity assay for 4-OHT

Untransfected HeLa cells were treated for one day with 4-OHT, EtOH (different concentrations, each) or no addition. Supernatant was removed and a washing step with 0.5 ml PBS was performed. The cells in the supernatant and PBS were counted with CASY counter. The number of dead cells was calculated by multiplying the number of living cell with (100 - percentage of living cells) / 100.

Confocal fluorescence microscopy

Pictures were taken of all different constructs by a confocal fluorescence microscope. The ration of the mean nuclear to cytoplasmic red flourescence was determined by ImageJ.

No significant difference in subcellular localisation upon 4-OHT stimulus was detectable this way.

19.06.2013

Second transfection of all constructs

HeLa cells seeded onto cover slides in a 24 well plate were transfected by the following protocol:

0.75 ng of DNA per well were filled up to 50 µl with OptiMEM
2.5 µl of PEI per well were filled up to 50 µl with OptiMEM

These two solutions were mixed by immediately 2x vortexing for ~ 5 s. After 20 min incubation 100 µl were added dropwise to each well.

Transfection scheme:

20.06.2013

4-OHT treatment

4-OHT was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 1 and 5 µM; EtOH was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 0.1 % (which is the same amount as in the medium with 4-OHT, as 4-OHT is dissolved in EtOH).

31 h after transfection the old medium was removed from the cells and the new mixed media were added according to the transfection scheme.

21.06.2013

Cell fixation

After an over night incubation cells on each well were washed with 500 µl PBS and fixed with 200 µl PFA (4 %) solution by incubating for 10 min on ice and at least 20 min at RT.
Cells attached on cover slides were stained with DAPI and DRAQ5 (incubation in DAPI or DRAQ5 solution consisting of 1 µl DAPI or DRAQ5 in 5 ml dH2O for 5 s, respectively) and rinsed in dH2O. Cover slides were dried and mounted on a drop of Mowiol solution (with DABCO) with cells down. After a drying step at 37 °C for 15 min samples were sealed with nail polish and stored at 4 °C.

Fluorescence microscopy

No big difference between 4-OHT and EtOH treatment was detectable.

25.06.2013

Transfection for western blotting

HEK cells seeded in three 6 well plates were transfected with pIG3001, 2, 5, 7 & 9 by the following protocol:

3.75 ng of DNA per well were filled up to 250 µl with OptiMEM
12.5 µl of PEI per well were filled up to 250 µl with OptiMEM

These two solutions were mixed by immediately 2x vortexing for ~ 5 s. After 20 min incubation 500 µl were added dropwise to each well.

26.06.2013

4-OHT treatment

4-OHT was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 1 µM; EtOH was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 0.1 % (which is the same amount as in the medium with 4-OHT, as 4-OHT is dissolved in EtOH).

30 h after transfection the old medium was removed from the cells and the new mixed media were added to the wells, both 4-OHT and EtOH for each construct.

27.06.2013

Cell fractionation

Cells were washed twice with 1 ml PBS, then incubated for 30 min on ice with 0.5 ml hypotonic lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES pH=7.4; 5 mM MgCl2; 1 mM EDTA; 1 Protease inhibitor cocktail tablet / 50 ml buffer). After mechanical detachment lysates were centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 g. Supernatant and pellet were separated.

Sample preparation for SDS-PAGE

200 µl of supernatants were mixed with 50 μl of 5x SDS loading buffer (10 % SDS; 0.3125 M Tris-HCl pH=6.8; 50 % glycerol, 12.5 % 2-Mercaptoethanol; 0.025 % Bromphenol blue) and heated for 5 min at 95 °C. The pellets resuspended in 15 μl 5x SDS loading buffer and heated for 5 min at 95 °C were diluted with 120 μl hypotonic lysis buffer and another 30 μl SDS loading buffer (5x) and sonified for 10 min at maximum.

SDS-PAGE cast

At first the separation gel was cast and covered with 200 μl isopropanol. After polymerisation the collection gel was cast on top.

separation gel (8 %)	ingredient	collection gel
19.2 ml	dH₂O	7 ml
10.4 ml	30 % acryl-bisacryl mix	2 ml
10.4 ml	1.5 M Tris with 0.4 % SDS, pH=8.8
	0.5 M Tris with 0.4 % SDS, pH=6.8	3 ml
400 µl	APS (10%)	120 µl
40 µl	TEMED	12 µl
40 ml	sum	12 ml

150 V were supplied for about 1.5 h.

Western blotting

A PVDF-membrane was activated in methanol and washed in transfer buffer (192 mM glycin; 25 mM Tris; 10 % methanol). 3 sheets of whatman paper were incubated in transfer buffer, too. The blotting apparatus was loaded in the following order from bottom up: 2 sheets of whatman paper - PVDF- membrane - gel - 1 sheet of whatman paper. An amperage of 0.35 A per membrane was supplied for 1.5 h.

27.06.2013

Antibody treatment

Membranes were incubated for 1 h in blocking buffer (PBS with 3 % milk powder), then for 2.5 h with anti HA mouse (1:1000 in blocking buffer). After 3 times washing for 5 min with PBS-T (PBS with 0.05 % Tween 20) membranes were incubated for 1 h with anti mouse HRP (1:5000 in blocking buffer) and washed again 3 times for 5 min with PBS-T.
Imaging was performed with automatically determined exposure time after addition of ECL I (250 mM luminol; 90 mM coumaric acid; 1 M Tris pH=8.5) + ECL II (30 % hydrogen peroxide; 1 M Tris pH=8.5) solution (500 μl of each).

Pictures of western blot of nuclear (A) and cytoplasmic (B) cell fraction.

Arrows indicate most probably the fusion proteins; other bands are unspecific AB-bindings or (N-terminal) fusion protein fragments.
Only the controls are detectable and act as expected.

These data suggest that altering the subcellular localization of a Cas9 fusion protein upon a 4-OHT stimulus is not possible. Because of this it ought to be tested, if the functionality of Cas9 can be controlled by hormone induction. Thus, in a new experiment a SEAP plasmid should be targeted.

RNA Plasmid for SEAP Assay

pX334a digested with PstI and religated afterwards ("pIG3010") was used as initial plasmid for the introduction of crRNAs (oligos designt for targeting two different SEAP loci).

July

14.07.2013

Digest of pX334a

Cas9 was cut out of pX334a to get a plasmid containing only the tracrRNA and the crRNA.

ingredient	sample 1	sample 2
pX334a	0.9 µg	1.8 µg
PstI HF	1 µl	1 µl
NEB buffer 4	5 µl	5 µl
dH₂O	up to 50 µl	up to 50 µl

Incabation at 37 °C for 2 h.

Gel run

From left to right: Marker (2µl); digest 1 (55 µl); digest 1 (4 µl); digest 2 (55 µl); digest 2 (4 µl); Marker (0.5 µl)

Only the upper band of digest 1 was cut out, as the digest of sample 2 was not completely.

15.07.2013

Gel extraction

DNA was purified using High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit of Roche.

Changes to the protocol:

incubation at 56 °C for 10 min for gel dissolving
elution with dH₂O (incubation at 50 °C for 4 min before centrifugation)

Yield: 30 ng/µl

Religation of pX334a backbone

ingredient	amount
Backbone of pX334a	150 ng
T4-Ligase	1 µl
T4-Ligase buffer	2 µl
dH₂O	up to 20 µl

Incubation at 22 °C for 1 h.

Transformation

5 µl of plasmid were added to 25 µl of chemically competent E. coli cells
incubation for 10 min on ice
heatshock (42 °C for 45 s)
incubation for 2 min on ice
addition of 500 µl LB medium
incubation for 1 h at 37 °C (shaking)
distribution of 5, 50 and 300 µl on LB plates with ampicilline
incubation over night at 37 °C

16.07.2013

Picking of colonies

4 colonies were spread on a 1/4 plate.

17.07.2013

Miniprep

DNA was purified using High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit of Roche.

Yield: ~ 75 ng/µl

Oligo annealing

Ordered oligos (single stranded) were annealed to create the insert for the crRNA locus:

oIG3013 & oIG3014 for Targetsequence I oIG3015 & oIG3016 for Targetsequence II

Mix:

ingredient	volume
Oligo 1 (100 µM)	50 µl
Oligo 2 (100 µM)	50 µl
dH₂O	150 µl

Incubation at 98 °C for 4 min, then let cool down for 3 h (in turned off heating block)

18.07.2013

Digestion of pIG3010 with BbsI

RNA plasmid was opened in order to insert the crRNA coding sequences.

ingredient	volume
pIG3010 (75 ng/µl)	10 µl
Bbs I	1 µl
NEB buffer 2.1	5 µl
dH₂O	up to 50 µl

Incabation at 37 °C for 2 h.

Gel run

Gelextraction

DNA was purified using High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit of Roche.

Changes to the protocol:

incubation at 56 °C for 10 min for gel dissolving
elution with dH₂O (incubation at 50 °C for 4 min before centrifugation)

Yield: 40 ng/µl

Insertion of annealed Oligos

Digested pIG3010 was ligated with oligo I or II in a 1:3 or 1:6 ratio.

ingredient	amount
opened pIG3010	30 ng
Insert (20 µM)	1 ng
T4-Ligase	1 µl
T4-Ligase buffer	2 µl
dH₂O	up to 20 µl

Incubation at 22 °C for 1 h.

Transformation

5 µl of plasmid were added to 25 µl of chemically competent E. coli cells
incubation for 10 min on ice
heatshock (42 °C for 45 s)
incubation for 2 min on ice
addition of 500 µl LB medium
incubation for 1 h at 37 °C (shaking)
distribution of 300 µl on LB plates with ampicilline
incubation over night at 37 °C

19.07.2013

Picking of colonies

2 colonies of each plate were spread on a 1/4 plate.

20.07.2013

Miniprep

DNA was purified using High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit of Roche.

Only 1 colony of each ligation approach was prepped.

Yield: ~ 150 ng/µl

Test digest

ingredient	volume
pIG3011 (~ 150 ng/µl)	2 µl
PstI HF	0.5 µl
NdeI	0.5 µl
NEB buffer 4	1 µl
dH₂O	up to 10 µl

Incabation at 37 °C for 1:10 h.

ingredient	volume
pIG3012 (~ 150 ng/µl)	2 µl
EcoRI HF	0.5 µl
PflMI	0.5 µl
BSA	0.5 µl
NEB buffer 2	1 µl
dH₂O	up to 10 µl

Gel run

From left to right: Marker (1 µl); pIG3011 (1:3 ligation); pIG3011 (1:6 ligation); pIG3012 (1:3 ligation); pIG3012 (1:6 ligation)

Expected bands with insert: pIG3011 [0.2 & 5.4 kb], pIG3012 [0.55, 0.7 & 4.3 kb]

Expected bands without insert: pIG3011 [0.17 & 5.4 kb], pIG3012 [0.7 & 4.8 kb]

In pIG3012 there most probably no insert, for pIG3011 it is unknown.

20.07.2013

Colony PCR

Fwd. primer: fwd. oligo of insert (oIG3013 for pIG3011 & oIG3015 for pIG3012); rev. primer: Gibson primer of Cas9 (oIG3004).

Control: Fwd. primer: Cas9 sequencing primer (oIG0015); rev. primer: Gibson primer of Cas9 (oIG3004).

Mix:

ingredient	volume
pIG3011/pIG3012	pick of colony OR 0.5 µl
Primers (10 µM)	each 1 µl
Taq polymerase	0.33 µl
Taq standard buffer	2 µl
dNTPs (2.5 mM)	3 µl
dH₂O	up to 20 µl

Program:

temperature	time
95 °C	5 min
95 °C	30 s
63 °C	30 s
68 °C	20 s
68 °C	10 min

Step 2 - 4 were repeated for 18 times.

Gel run

From left to right: Marker (2-log; 1 µl); 3x pIG3011 (1:3 ligation); 3x pIG3011 (1:6 ligation); 3x pIG3012 (1:3 ligation); 3x pIG3012 (1:6 ligation); control

Expected band: ~ 600 bp

Colony PCR did not work, because even the control does not show a band at the expected size.

22.07.2013

Repeat of Insertion of annealed Oligos

Ligation of pIG3010 with SEAP-Oligos I and II.

ingredient	amount
pIG3010	1,25 µl
Seap I/II	2,5 µl
T4-Ligase	1 µl
T4-Ligase buffer	2 µl
dH₂O	up to 20 µl

Incubation at 22 °C for 1 h.

4 µl of plasmid were added to 25 µl of chemically competent E. coli cells
incubation for 10 min on ice
heatshock (42 °C for 40 s)
incubation for 2 min on ice
addition of 300 µl LB medium
incubation for 1 h at 37 °C (shaking)
distribution of 300 µl on LB plates with ampicilline
incubation over night at 37 °C

Miniprep

DNA of 4 more colonies (2x pIG3011 + 2x pIG3012) were purified using High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit of Roche.

Yield: ~ 300 ng/µl

Test digest with new colonies

ingredient	volume
pIG3011 (~ 300 ng/µl)	1 µl
PstI HF	0.5 µl
NdeI	0.5 µl
NEB buffer 4	1 µl
dH₂O	up to 10 µl

Incabation at 37 °C for 2 h (all digests).

ingredient	volume
pIG3012 (~ 300 ng/µl)	1 µl
EcoRI HF	0.5 µl
PflMI	0.5 µl
BSA	0.5 µl
NEB buffer 2	1 µl
dH₂O	up to 10 µl

ingredient	volume
pIG3010 (75 ng/µl)	4 µl
PstI HF	0.5 µl
NdeI	0.5 µl
NEB buffer 4	1 µl
dH₂O	up to 10 µl

This digest was performed to have a comparison for digest of pIG3011.

Gel run

From left to right: Marker (1 µl); pIG3011 (1:3 ligation); pIG3010; pIG3011 (1:6 ligation); pIG3012 (1:3 ligation); pIG3012 (1:6 ligation)

Expected bands with insert: pIG3011 [0.2 & 5.4 kb], pIG3012 [0.55, 0.7 & 4.3 kb]

Expected bands without insert: pIG3011 [0.17 & 5.4 kb], pIG3012 [0.7 & 4.8 kb]

In pIG3012 there is most probably no insert, for pIG3011, too, because there is no difference to pIG3010 (plasmid without insert -> band at about 0.2 kb should be 10 bp shorter).

Sequencing

pIG3011-65 (1:6 ligation, colony 5) and pIG3012-61 (1:6 ligation, colony 1) were sequenced with oIG0015.

Both sequencings indicate that the sequenced plasmids are pIG3010. Thus, the BbsI digest did not work.

23.07.2013

Repeat of opening pIG3010

ingredient	digest	control of BsbI functionality
pIG3010 (75 ng/µl)	10 µl	-
pIG3005 (1.7 µg/µl)	-	0.5 µl
BbsI	1 µl	1 µ l
NEB buffer 2.1	5 µl	5 µl
dH₂O	up to 50 µl	up to 50 µl

Incabation at 37 °C for 1.5 h.

Gel run

From left to right: Marker (1 µl); digested pIG3010 (40 µl); digested pIG3010 (4 µl); undigested pIG3010 (4 µl); pIG3005 (4 µl)

Expected bands: pIG3010 [5.6 kb], pIG3005 [3.5 & 6 kb].

The bands of pIG3005 are at the expected size -> BbsI did work. pIG3010 showed a band at 5.6 kb, which was cut out. The band below is the undigested pIG3010.

Gel extraction

DNA were purified using High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit of Roche.

Changes to the protocol:

incubation at 56 °C for 10 min for gel dissolving
elution with dH₂O (incubation at 50 °C for 4 min before centrifugation)

Yield: 120 ng/µl

24.07.2013

Repeat of insertion of annealed Oligos

Ligation of digested pIG3010 with SEAP-Oligos I and II.

ingredient	amount
pIG3010	0,4 µl
Seap I/II	2,5 µl
T4-Ligase	1 µl
T4-Ligase buffer	2 µl
dH₂O	up to 20 µl

Incubation at 22 °C for 1 h.

4 µl of plasmid were added to 25 µl of chemically competent E. coli cells
incubation for 10 min on ice
heatshock (42 °C for 40 s)
incubation for 2 min on ice
addition of 300 µl LB medium
incubation for 1 h at 37 °C (shaking)
distribution of 300 µl on LB plates with ampicilline
incubation over night at 37 °C

25.07.2013

Coloy PCR on pIG3010 with target sites SEAP

Colonies were picked and transferred into the following master mix. Afterwards they were streaked out onto plates, containing Amp as selective.

oIG3013I and 3015II were used as forward primers, oIG3004 as reverse primer.

Mix:

ingredient	volume
Template	1 colonie
Primers (10 µM)	each 0.4 µl
polymerase	0.3 µl
buffer	2 µl
dNTPs (2.5 mM)	1.6 µl
dH₂O	up to 20 µl

Program:

temperature	time
95 °C	5 min
95 °C	20 s
52 °C for control, 62 °C for samples	30 s
68 °C	30 s
68 °C	5 min

Step 2 - 4 were repeated for 25 times.

No specific amplification was observed. Oligos do not seem to be suitable as primers for cPCR.

Miniprep

DNA of 6 colonies (3x pIG3011 + 3x pIG3012) were purified using High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit of Roche.

Yield: ~ 30 ng/µl

26.07.2013

Test digest

ingredient	volume
pIG3011 (~ 30 ng/µl)	8 µl
PstI HF	0.5 µl
NdeI	0.5 µl
NEB buffer 4	1 µl

Incabation at 37 °C for 3.5 h (all digests).

ingredient	volume
pIG3012 (~ 30 ng/µl)	7.5 µl
EcoRI HF	0.5 µl
PflMI	0.5 µl
BSA	0.5 µl
NEB buffer 2	1 µl

ingredient	volume
pIG3010 (75 ng/µl)	4 µl
PstI HF	0.5 µl
NdeI	0.5 µl
NEB buffer 4	1 µl
dH₂O	up to 10 µl

This digest was performed to have a comparison for digest of pIG3011.

Gel run

From left to right: Marker (1 µl); pIG3011_1-3; digested pIG3010; pIG3012 ; marker 1 ul

Expected bands with insert: pIG3011 [0.2 & 5.4 kb], pIG3012 [0.55, 0.7 & 4.3 kb]

Expected bands without insert: pIG3011 [0.17 & 5.4 kb], pIG3012 [0.7 & 4.8 kb]

pIG3011_1 and pIG3012_2 were already sequenced and contain no insert. pIG3011_2 & 3 do not really differ from pIG3011_1, pIG3012_2 show 4 bands, 3 of them at the expeced size.

Sequencing

pIG3011_3 and pIG3012_2 were sequenced with oIG0015. Unfortunately they turned out to be undigested pIG3010.

2nd repeat of opening pIG3010

As test digestions and sequencing of the days before suggests that BbsI did not digest properly a new batch of pIG3010 was digested using BbsI and incubated overnight to avoid closed plasmid.

Nevertheless, sample pIG3011_3 and pIG3012_2 were sent for sequencing.

ingredient	volume
pIG3010	0,7 µg; 8 µl
BbsI	2 µl
NEB buffer 2.1	5 µl
dH₂O	up to 50 µl

Incabation at 37 °C ovenight.

Trafo of digested pIG3010

To test if there is still undigested plasmid in the sample of digested pIG3010, E. coli were transformed with 40 ng of this sample and - as a control - with 40 ng of undigested pIG3010.

40 ng of plasmid were added to 25 µl of chemically competent E. coli cells
incubation for 10 min on ice
heatshock (42 °C for 45 s)
incubation for 2 min on ice
addition of 500 µl LB medium
incubation for 15 min at 37 °C (shaking)
distribution of 200 µl on LB plates with ampicilline
incubation over night at 37 °C

The plate with the digested pIG3010 contained half as much as the plate with the undigested pIG3010. Thus, the BbsI digest did not work properly. However it has to be considered that the bacteria are able to repare double strand breaks via non homologous end joining.

Digest of pIG3010 with BbsI (Alina and Philipp)

As the digest of pIG3010 seems to have still a lot of undigested backbone, digestion was repeated.

ingredient	volume
pIG3010	1 µg
BbSI	1 µl from stock (-80°C)
NEB buffer 2.1	5 µl
dH₂O	up to 50 µl

Incabation at 37 °C for 3 h.

29.07.2013

Repeat of insertion of annealed Oligos

Ligation of digested pIG3010 with SEAP-Oligos I and II.

ingredient	amount
pIG3010	30 ng
Seap I/II	1 ng
T4-Ligase	1 µl
T4-Ligase buffer	2 µl
dH₂O	up to 20 µl

Incubation at 22 °C for 1 h.

4 µl of plasmid were added to 25 µl of chemically competent E. coli cells
incubation for 10 min on ice
heatshock (42 °C for 40 s)
incubation for 2 min on ice
addition of 300 µl LB medium
incubation for 1 h at 37 °C (shaking)
distribution of 300 µl on LB plates with ampicilline
incubation over night at 37 °C

31.07.2013

Miniprep

DNA was purified using High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit of Roche.

8 colonies of each ligation approach was prepped.

Yield: ~ 250 ng/µl

randomized samples were sent for sequencing.

31.07.2013

Sequencing results

pIG3011_4 and pIG3012_7 proved themselves to be correct. 100ml LB containing Amp were inoculated with these strains, as well as the CMV:SEAP construct.

August

02.08.2013

Midiprep of pIG3011 and pIG3012

DNA was purified using Jetstar Plasmid Purification midi kit.

Yield: ~ 2,5µg/µl

04.08.2013 (Alina & Philipp)

Seeding of cells for functioal test of ERT as catalytic inhibitor of CAS9.

As the plasmids are ready, HEK293T cells were be seeded in 24 wells with 65.000 cells each well. This will allow a functional test of possible inhibtory effects of Cas9:ERT. A quantitative SEAP essay should give answer to the question wether we can induce CRISPRi via Tamoxifen.Seeding was performed according to standard protocol.

06.08.2013

Transfection

Protocol:

40 µl Opti-MEM + 1.5 µl PEI-solution were mixed in a 1.5 ml Eppi.
0.5 µg of the DNA of interest were prepaired in another Eppi .
Addition of the DNA to former Eppi, vortexing for 15 s and incubation for 15 min at RT
Solution was spread them drop-wise to the cells in the dish

Transfection scheme:

07.08.2013

Medium change

12 h after transfection DMEM complete was removed and replaced by 0.5 ml per well DMEM complete containing 1 µM 4-OHT or 0.1 % EtOH, respectively, according to the transfection scheme.

08.08.2013

Medium change

24 h later medium was changed again according to the transfection scheme, this time with a washing step (0.5 ml DPBS per well).

09.08.2013

SEAP measurement

The following was done 22 h after the last medium change (58 h after transfection) with technical triplicates.

400 µl of cell supernatant were collected in Epis.
Incubation for 30 min at 65 °C.
Centrifugation for 1 min at 1250 g.
100 µl of SEAP buffer were filled in the wells of a 96 well plate.
Addition of 80 µl supernatant to each well.
Addition of 20 µl pNPP (substrate).
96 plate was immediately placed in the blade reader.

Spectroscopic measurement every minute for 150 times; wavelenght 405 nm.

Measurement was aborted, as the SEAP concentration was too high.

10.08.13

Repeat of SEAP measurement

Cell supernatant was diluted 1:10 with DMEM that was heated for 30 min at 65 °C and measurement was repeated.

The results indicate that also the functionality of the Cas9-ERT2 fusion protein is not controlable with hormone induction, as the SEAP expression is more or less the same for wells with and without 4-OHT.

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 </p>
+<p class="first_order"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/crrna"> Targeting </a></p>
 <p class="first_order"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/lab_effector"> Effector </a></p>
-<p class="first_order"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/induction"> Induction </a> </p>
+<p class="first_order"><a class="active" href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/induction"> Effector Control </a> </p>
-<p class="second_order"> <a id="link" href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/lab_light"> Light </a> </p>
+<p class="second_order_note"> <a id="link" href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/lab_light"> Light </a> </p>
-<p class="second_order"> <a id="link" href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/lab_hormon"> Hormon </a> </p>
+<p class="second_order_note"> <a class="active" id="link" href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/lab_hormon"> Hormone </a> </p>
+<p class="third_order"> <a href="#april"> April </a> </p>
+<p class="third_order"> <a href="#may"> May </a> </p>
+<p class="third_order"> <a href="#june"> June </a> </p>
+<p class="third_order"> <a href="#july"> July </a> </p>
+<p class="third_order"> <a href="#august"> August </a> </p>
-<p class="first_order"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/crrna"> Targeting </a></p>
-<p class="first_order"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/method"> uniBAss </a></p>
 <p class="first_order"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/modeling"> Modeling </a></p>
-<p class="first_order"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/standardisation"> Standardisation </a></p>
+<p class="first_order"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/method"> uniBAss </a></p>
+<p class="first_order"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/standardisation"> Standardization </a></p>
+<p class="first_order"> <a id="link" href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/protocols"> Material and Methods </a> </p>
@@ Line 62: / Line 69: @@
 ********************************************** -->
-<div id="main_contant">
+<div id="main_contant_note">
 <div id="h1">
-Induction - Hormon
+Effector Control - Hormone
 </div>
-<h2>Protocols</h2>
+<!-- <h2>Protocols</h2>
 If there´s no other remark all the experiments were performed by the following protocols.
@@ Line 156: / Line 163: @@
 <p>Step 2 - 4 were repeated for 18 times.</p>
 <p>** time calculation: size template [kb] x 30 s</p>
-</div>
+</div> -->
 <h2>Planned constructs</h2>
-<img src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1367506053&w=500&h=287&media=wiki:laborbuecher:constructs_hormone_induction.jpg">
+<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/ec/0_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg">
 <h2>Practical work: Localization</h2>
-<h3>17.04.2013</h3>
-<h5>Trafo of pMZ333</h5>
+<div id="april">
+<p id="h2">
+April
+</p>
+</div>
+<h2>17.04.2013</h2>
+<h3>Trafo of pMZ333</h3>
 pMZ333 containing mCherry and the backbone (Bb)
-<h3>18.04.2013</h3>
+<h2>18.04.2013</h2>
-<h5>Picking of clones</h5>
+<h3>Picking of clones</h3>
 colonies of pMItom (containing ERT2) and 1 of pMZ333.
-<h3>19.04.2013</h3>
+<h2>19.04.2013</h2>
-<h5>Minipreps of pMZ333 and pMItom </h5>
+<h3>Minipreps of pMZ333 and pMItom </h3>
 Yield: 100 - 300 ng/µl
-<h3>23.04.2013</h3>
+<h2>23.04.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Digestion of pMZ333</h5>
+   <h3>Digestion of pMZ333</h3>
 Bb was cut out of pMZ333 by XbaI and EcoRI.
-   <h5>Gel run</h5>
+   <h3>Gel run</h3>
 ,7 % agarose, marker: <i>GeneRuler 1 kb</i>
 <div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1367571526&w=500&h=376&media=wiki:laborbuecher:exp1_23.04.13_verdau_bb_testverdau_pmitom.jpg"> </td>
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/7/78/1_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 194: / Line 208: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Gel extraction</h5>
+   <h3>Gel extraction</h3>
 Bb was purified.<br>
 Yield: 20 - 30 ng/µl
-<h3>25.04.2013</h3>
+<h2>25.04.2013</h2>
-   <h5>PCR of aIG3001 and aIG3006-8</h5>
+   <h3>PCR of aIG3001 and aIG3006-8</h3>
-   <h5>Gel run</h5>
+   <h3>Gel run</h3>
 ,9 % agarose, marker: <i>GeneRuler 1 kb</i>
 <div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1367571526&w=500&h=376&media=wiki:laborbuecher:exp1_26.04.13_pcr1.jpg"> </td>
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/9/9f/2_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 214: / Line 228: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Gel extraction</h5>
+   <h3>Gel extraction</h3>
 PCR products were purified.<br>
 Yield: 30 - 90 ng/µl
-<h3>03.05.2013</h3>
+<div id="may">
-   <h5>PCR of aIG3002-5</h5>
+<p id="h2">
+May
+</p>
+</div>
+<h2>03.05.2013</h2>
+   <h3>PCR of aIG3002-5</h3>
 <div class="floatleft">
 Mix:
@@ Line 231: / Line 251: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Gel run</h5>
+   <h3>Gel run</h3>
 ,9 % agarose, marker: <i>GeneRuler 1 kb</i>
 <div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1367571526&w=500&h=376&media=wiki:laborbuecher:exp1_03.05.13_pcr2_1_.jpg"> </td>
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/1/13/3_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 245: / Line 265: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Gel extraction</h5>
+   <h3>Gel extraction</h3>
 PCR products were purified with the following changes to the standard protocol:
 <ul>
@@ Line 254: / Line 274: @@
 Yield: 100 - 140 ng/µl
-<h3>06.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>06.05.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Gibson assembly</h5>
+   <h3>Gibson assembly</h3>
 Pipetting scheme:
 <div id="floathleft">
-<img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1367916710&w=499&h=231&media=wiki:laborbuecher:gibson1_pipettierschema.jpg">
+<img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/9/9b/4_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg">
 <p>to each symple 1 µl water was added</p>
 </div>
@@ Line 270: / Line 290: @@
 <li>Incubation for 10 min on ice</li>
 </ol>
-   <h5>Trafo</h5>
+   <h3>Trafo</h3>
 <ol>
 <li>4 µl of each assemblies were added to 25 µl of chemically competent <i>E. coli</i> cells</li>
@@ Line 282: / Line 302: @@
 </ol>
-<h3>07.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>07.05.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Trafo repeat</h5>
+   <h3>Trafo repeat</h3>
 As there were very few colonies only on the 300 µl plates which were surrounded by "satellite colonies", transformation was repeated by using the same protocol exept of:
 <ul>
@@ Line 291: / Line 311: @@
 </ul>
-<h3>08.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>08.05.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Picking of clones</h5>
+   <h3>Picking of clones</h3>
 Colonies from plates pIG3001-8 (exept of pIG3006, because there were no colonies) of trafo repeat were spread on new agar plates.<br>
 Colonies of the first gibson trafo hopefully containing pIG3003,5,6 were spread on new plates to get single colonies.
-<h3>09.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>09.05.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Picking of clones</h5>
+   <h3>Picking of clones</h3>
 Single colonies of the first gibson trafo were spread on new agar plates.
-   <h5>Minipreps of the second gibson trafo</h5>
+   <h3>Minipreps of the second gibson trafo</h3>
 Yield: 40 - 350 µg/ml
-   <h5>Test digest of gibson constructs</h5>
+   <h3>Test digest of gibson constructs</h3>
 <div class="floatleft">
 <table class="tabelle">
@@ Line 313: / Line 333: @@
 </div>
-<h3>10.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>10.05.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Gel run of test digest</h5>
+   <h3>Gel run of test digest</h3>
 % agarose, marker: <i>GeneRuler 1 kb</i>
 <div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1367571526&w=500&h=376&media=wiki:laborbuecher:exp1_10.05.13_testverdau_2._gibson_trafo_gel_1.jpg"> </td>
+<td> <img class="gelred" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/4/40/5_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 330: / Line 350: @@
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1367571526&w=500&h=376&media=wiki:laborbuecher:exp1_10.05.13_testverdau_2._gibson_trafo_gel_2.jpg"> </td>
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/3/32/6_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 339: / Line 359: @@
 </div>
 <p>The banding pattern of pIG3001 (all colonies); 2,1; 2,2; 4,1; 4,2; 4,4 and 8 (all colonies) has been proven to be the expected one by sequencing the linkers. Thus, the marker run has to be wrong.</p>
-   <h5>Minipreps of the first gibson trafo</h5>
+   <h3>Minipreps of the first gibson trafo</h3>
 Changes:
 <ul>
@@ Line 346: / Line 366: @@
 </ul>
 Yield: 40 - 180 ng/µl
-   <h5>Test digest of gibson constructs</h5>
+   <h3>Test digest of gibson constructs</h3>
 <div class="floatleft">
 <table class="tabelle">
@@ Line 357: / Line 377: @@
 Incabation at 37 °C for 1:45 h.
 </div>
-   <h5>Gel run of second test digest</h5>
+   <h3>Gel run of second test digest</h3>
 % agarose, marker: <i>GeneRuler 1 kb</i>
 <div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1367571526&w=500&h=376&media=wiki:laborbuecher:exp1_10.05.13_testverdau_1._gibson_trafo.jpg"> </td>
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/2d/7_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 371: / Line 391: @@
 </div>
-<h3>14.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>14.05.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Fusion PCR of aIG3009 & 10</h5>
+   <h3>Fusion PCR of aIG3009 & 10</h3>
 <p>aIG3005 & 6 were fused to aIG3009, aIG3007 & 8 to aIG3010 in order to reduce the fragments for Gibson assembly.</p>
 <div class="floatleft">
@@ Line 413: / Line 433: @@
 *  time calculation: size template [kb] x 30 s
 </div>
-   <h5>Gel run of fusion PCR</h5>
+   <h3>Gel run of fusion PCR</h3>
 Fragment´s lengths were as expected, though the band of aIG3009 was very slight.
-<h3>15.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>15.05.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Gel extraction of fusion PCR</h5>
+   <h3>Gel extraction of fusion PCR</h3>
 PCR products were purified as described on 03.05.2013, but DNA solution was loaded on the column again.<br>
 Yield: 6 / 49 ng/µl
-<h3>16.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>16.05.2013</h2>
-   <h5>PCR of aIG3006 (repeat)</h5>
+   <h3>PCR of aIG3006 (repeat)</h3>
 This PCR was repeated as the concentration yielded from the first attempt is too low for Gibson assembly.
-<h3>21.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>21.05.2013</h2>
-	<h5>Repeat of fusion PCR of aIG3009</h5>
+	<h3>Repeat of fusion PCR of aIG3009</h3>
 		<p>Fusion PCR was repeated, as the concentration of the first attempt is too low for Gibson assembly.</p>
-	<h5>Gel run of PCR of aIG3006 and fusion PCR of aIG3009</h5>
+	<h3>Gel run of PCR of aIG3006 and fusion PCR of aIG3009</h3>
 		<p>Gel did not show the desired bands.</p>
-	  <h5>Gibson assembly 2</h5>
+	  <h3>Gibson assembly 2</h3>
 		Pipetting scheme:
 			<div id="floathleft">
-			<img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1376237906&w=500&h=306&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:gibson_assembly_2.jpg">
+			<img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/b0/8_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg">
 			<p>For pIG3005 and pIG3007 only the half amount of each PCR product was used as the concentration of aIG3006 was very
@@ Line 449: / Line 469: @@
 			</ol>
-	<h5>Trafo</h5>
+	<h3>Trafo</h3>
 		<ol>
 			<li>4 µl of each assemblies were added to 25 µl of chemically competent <i>E. coli</i> cells</li>
@@ Line 461: / Line 481: @@
 		</ol>
-<h3>22.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>22.05.2013</h2>
-	<h5>Midiprep of pIG3003, 4 & 8</h5>
+	<h3>Midiprep of pIG3003, 4 & 8</h3>
 		<p> As the sequencing results were positive, plasmids were amplified and midiprepped according to the manual of <i>Jetstar Plasmid
@@ Line 468: / Line 488: @@
 		<p>Yield: ~ 1 µg/µl for pIG3004 & 8; no DNA was isolated for pIG3003.</p>
-<h3>23.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>23.05.2013</h2>
-	<h5>Miniprep of Gibson assembly 2</h5>
+	<h3>Miniprep of Gibson assembly 2</h3>
 		<p>DNA was purified using <i>High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit</i> of Roche.</p>
 		<p>Yield: 30 - 90 ng/µl</p>
-	<h5>Test digest of Gibson assembly 2</h5>
+	<h3>Test digest of Gibson assembly 2</h3>
 <p>Mix 1 was used for DNA concentrations beneath 60 ng/µl, Mix 2 for concentrations above 60 ng/µl.</p>
 <div class="floatleft">
@@ Line 486: / Line 506: @@
 </div>
-<h3>24.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>24.05.2013</h2>
-	  <h5>Gel run</h5>
+	  <h3>Gel run</h3>
 <div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/f/fc/9_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
-t=1376147945&w=500&h=376&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:24.05.13_test_digest_gibson_2_1_.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 502: / Line 520: @@
 </div>
-<h3>27.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>27.05.2013</h2>
-	<h5>Amplification of aIG3006 & 9 by PCR</h5>
+	<h3>Amplification of aIG3006 & 9 by PCR</h3>
 <div class="floatleft">
 Mix:
@@ Line 533: / Line 551: @@
 <p>Yield after Gel extraction with <i>High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit</i> of Roche: 40 ng/µl for aIG3006 and 82 ng/µl for aIG3009.</p>
-<h3>28.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>28.05.2013</h2>
-	<h5>Gibson assembly 3</h5>
+	<h3>Gibson assembly 3</h3>
 		Pipetting scheme:
 			<div id="floathleft">
-			<img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1376237913&w=500&h=261&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:gibson_assembly_3.jpg">
+			<img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/3/34/10_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg">
 			<p>For pIG3005 and pIG3007 only the half amount of each PCR product was used as the concentration of aIG3006 was very
@@ Line 552: / Line 570: @@
 			</ol>
-	<h5>Trafo</h5>
+	<h3>Trafo</h3>
 		<ol>
 			<li>4 µl of each assemblies were added to 25 µl of chemically competent <i>E. coli</i> cells</li>
@@ Line 564: / Line 582: @@
 		</ol>
-	<h5>Transfection of pIG3004 and pIG3008</h5>
+	<h3>Transfection of pIG3004 and pIG3008</h3>
 		<ul>
 			<li>0.75 ng of DNA per well were filled up to 50 µl with OptiMEM</li>
@@ Line 574: / Line 592: @@
 		<p>Medium change was performed after 2 h.</p>
-<h3>28.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>28.05.2013</h2>
-	<h5>Cell fixation</h5>
+	<h3>Cell fixation</h3>
 		<p>Cells on each well were washed with 500 µl PBS and fixed with 200 µl PFA (4 %) solution by incubating for 10 min on ice and at
@@ Line 585: / Line 603: @@
 DABCO) with cells down. After a drying step at 37 °C for 15 min samples were sealed with nail polish and stored at 4 °C.<p>
-	<h5>Flourescence microscopy</h5>
+	<h3>Flourescence microscopy</h3>
 		<div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1376148852&w=500&h=372&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:first_microscopy_pictures_1_.jpg"> </td>
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/ef/11_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 600: / Line 618: @@
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/7/7f/12_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
-t=1376148852&w=500&h=372&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:first_microscopy_pictures_2_.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 610: / Line 627: @@
 <p>These pictures show that pIG3004 is clearly localized in the nucleus whereas pIG3008 is localized in the cytoplasm. Nevertheless more cells have to be analyzed.</p>
-<h3>30.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>30.05.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Midiprep of pIG3001, 3 & 6</h5>
+   <h3>Midiprep of pIG3001, 3 & 6</h3>
 <p> As the sequencing results were positive, plasmids were amplified and midiprepped according to the manual of <i>Jetstar Plasmid Purification MIDI
@@ Line 617: / Line 634: @@
 <p>Yield: 1.4 µg/µl for pIG3006; 470 ng/µl for pIG3001; 71 ng/µl for pIG3003.</p>
-   <h5>Test digest of Gibson assembly 3</h5>
+   <h3>Test digest of Gibson assembly 3</h3>
 <div class="floatleft">
 <table class="tabelle">
@@ Line 629: / Line 646: @@
 </div>
-<h3>31.05.2013</h3>
+<h2>31.05.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Gel run</h5>
+   <h3>Gel run</h3>
 <div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1376237914&w=499&h=328&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:31.05.13_test_digest_of_gibson_assembly_3.jpg"> </td>
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/6/6c/13_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 643: / Line 660: @@
 </div>
-<h3>04.06.2013</h3>
-   <h5>Transfection of pIG3001, 3, 4, 6 & 8</h5>
+<div id="june">
+<p id="h2">
+June
+</p>
+</div>
+<h2>04.06.2013</h2>
+   <h3>Transfection of pIG3001, 3, 4, 6 & 8</h3>
 <p>HeLa cells seeded onto cover slides in a 24 well plate were transfected by the following protocol:</p>
 		<ul>
@@ Line 655: / Line 679: @@
 Transfection scheme:
 			<div id="floathleft">
-			<img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?
+			<img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/0/0a/14_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg">
-t=1376225975&w=500&h=309&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:transfection_scheme_ii.jpg">
 			</div>
-<h3>05.06.2013</h3>
+<h2>05.06.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Second Miniprep of Gibson assembly 3</h5>
+   <h3>Second Miniprep of Gibson assembly 3</h3>
 <p>As the sequencing of the only positive colony of pIG3007 pointed out a mutation, more colonies were prepped using <i>High Pure Plasmid Isolation
@@ Line 667: / Line 689: @@
 <p>Yield: ~ 60 ng/µl</p>
-   <h5>Second test digest of Gibson assembly 3</h5>
+   <h3>Second test digest of Gibson assembly 3</h3>
 <div class="floatleft">
 <table class="tabelle">
@@ Line 679: / Line 701: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Gel run</h5>
+   <h3>Gel run</h3>
 <div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1376237894&w=464&h=500&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:05.06.13_test_digest_2_of_gibson_assembly_3.jpg"> </td>
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/0/00/15_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 692: / Line 714: @@
 </div>
-<h3>06.06.2013</h3>
+<h2>06.06.2013</h2>
-   <h5>4-OHT treatment</h5>
+   <h3>4-OHT treatment</h3>
 <p>4-OHT was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 0.1, 1 and 10 µM; EtOH was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 0.1
@@ Line 699: / Line 721: @@
 <p>The old medium was removed from the cells and the new mixed media were added according to the transfection scheme.</p>
-   <h5>Cell fixation</h5>
+   <h3>Cell fixation</h3>
 <p>After 0.5, 1 and 3 h (according to the transfection scheme) cells on each well were washed with 500 µl PBS and fixed with 200 µl PFA (4 %) solution by
@@ Line 709: / Line 731: @@
 step at 37 °C for 15 min samples were sealed with nail polish and stored at 4 °C.<p>
-   <h5>Midiprep of pIG3002, 3, 5 & 7</h5>
+   <h3>Midiprep of pIG3002, 3, 5 & 7</h3>
 <p> As the sequencing results were positive, plasmids were amplified and midiprepped according to the manual of <i>Jetstar Plasmid Purification MIDI
@@ Line 715: / Line 737: @@
 <p>Yield: 1.7 µg/µl for pIG3005; 670 ng/µl for pIG3007; 540 ng/µl for pIG3002; 335 ng/µl for pIG3003.</p>
-<h3>07.06.2013</h3>
+<h2>07.06.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Microscopy</h5>
+   <h3>Microscopy</h3>
 <ul>
 <li>All samples showed red flourescence (except of pIG3006 & 8 treated with 10 µM 4-OHT, as there were almost no cells).</li>
@@ Line 725: / Line 747: @@
 </ul>
-<h3>10.06.2013</h3>
+<h2>10.06.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Midiprep of pIG3009</h5>
+   <h3>Midiprep of pIG3009</h3>
 <p> As experimental results indicate, that the 5' NLS has a maybe stronger influence on nuclear import than the 3' NLS, the wrong assembled plasmid with
@@ Line 734: / Line 756: @@
 <p>Yield: 300 ng/µl.</p>
-<h3>11.06.2013</h3>
+<h2>11.06.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Transfection of all constructs</h5>
+   <h3>Transfection of all constructs</h3>
 <p>HeLa cells seeded onto cover slides in a 24 well plate were transfected by the following protocol:</p>
 		<ul>
@@ Line 746: / Line 768: @@
 Transfection scheme:
 			<div id="floathleft">
-			<img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?
+			<img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/d8/16_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg">
-t=1376225975&w=500&h=309&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:transfection_scheme_iii.jpg">
 			</div>
-<h3>12.06.2013</h3>
+<h2>12.06.2013</h2>
-   <h5>4-OHT treatment</h5>
+   <h3>4-OHT treatment</h3>
 <p>4-OHT was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 0.1 and 1 µM; EtOH was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 0.1 %
@@ Line 758: / Line 778: @@
 <p>31 h after transfection the old medium was removed from the cells and the new mixed media were added according to the transfection scheme.</p>
-   <h5>Cell fixation</h5>
+   <h3>Cell fixation</h3>
 <p>After 3 and 16 h (according to the transfection scheme) cells on each well were washed with 500 µl PBS and fixed with 200 µl PFA (4 %) solution by
@@ Line 768: / Line 788: @@
 step at 37 °C for 15 min samples were sealed with nail polish and stored at 4 °C.<p>
-<h3>13.06.2013</h3>
+<h2>13.06.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Toxity assay for 4-OHT</h5>
+   <h3>Toxity assay for 4-OHT</h3>
 <p>Untransfected HeLa cells were treated for one day with 4-OHT, EtOH (different concentrations, each) or no addition. Supernatant was removed and a
@@ Line 776: / Line 796: @@
 calculated by multiplying the number of living cell with (100 - percentage of living cells) / 100.</p>
-   <h5>Confocal fluorescence microscopy</h5>
+   <h3>Confocal fluorescence microscopy</h3>
 <p>Pictures were taken of all different constructs by a confocal fluorescence microscope. The ration of the mean nuclear to cytoplasmic red flourescence
@@ Line 782: / Line 802: @@
 <p>No significant difference in subcellular localisation upon 4-OHT stimulus was detectable this way.</p>
-<h3>19.06.2013</h3>
+<h2>19.06.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Second transfection of all constructs</h5>
+   <h3>Second transfection of all constructs</h3>
 <p>HeLa cells seeded onto cover slides in a 24 well plate were transfected by the following protocol:</p>
 		<ul>
@@ Line 794: / Line 814: @@
 Transfection scheme:
 			<div id="floathleft">
-			<img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?
+			<img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/1/13/17_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg">
-t=1376225975&w=500&h=309&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:transfection_scheme_iv.jpg">
 			</div>
-<h3>20.06.2013</h3>
+<h2>20.06.2013</h2>
-   <h5>4-OHT treatment</h5>
+   <h3>4-OHT treatment</h3>
 <p>4-OHT was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 1 and 5 µM; EtOH was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 0.1 %
@@ Line 806: / Line 824: @@
 <p>31 h after transfection the old medium was removed from the cells and the new mixed media were added according to the transfection scheme.</p>
-<h3>21.06.2013</h3>
+<h2>21.06.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Cell fixation</h5>
+   <h3>Cell fixation</h3>
 <p>After an over night incubation cells on each well were washed with 500 µl PBS and fixed with 200 µl PFA (4 %) solution by incubating for 10 min on ice
@@ Line 817: / Line 835: @@
 step at 37 °C for 15 min samples were sealed with nail polish and stored at 4 °C.<p>
-   <h5>Fluorescence microscopy</h5>
+   <h3>Fluorescence microscopy</h3>
 <p>No big difference between 4-OHT and EtOH treatment was detectable.</p>
-<h3>25.06.2013</h3>
+<h2>25.06.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Transfection for western blotting</h5>
+   <h3>Transfection for western blotting</h3>
 <p>HEK cells seeded in three 6 well plates were transfected with pIG3001, 2, 5, 7 & 9 by the following protocol:</p>
 		<ul>
@@ Line 831: / Line 849: @@
 each well.</p>
-<h3>26.06.2013</h3>
+<h2>26.06.2013</h2>
-   <h5>4-OHT treatment</h5>
+   <h3>4-OHT treatment</h3>
 <p>4-OHT was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 1 µM; EtOH was diluted in DMEM complete to a final concentration of 0.1 % (which is
@@ Line 840: / Line 858: @@
 construct.</p>
-<h3>27.06.2013</h3>
+<h2>27.06.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Cell fractionation</h5>
+   <h3>Cell fractionation</h3>
 <p>Cells were washed twice with 1 ml PBS, then incubated for 30 min on ice with 0.5 ml hypotonic lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES pH=7.4; 5 mM MgCl2; 1 mM
@@ Line 848: / Line 866: @@
 pellet were separated.</p>
-   <h5>Sample preparation for SDS-PAGE</h5>
+   <h3>Sample preparation for SDS-PAGE</h3>
 <p>200 µl of supernatants were mixed with 50 μl of 5x SDS loading buffer (10 % SDS; 0.3125 M Tris-HCl pH=6.8; 50 % glycerol, 12.5 % 2-Mercaptoethanol;
@@ Line 855: / Line 873: @@
 with 120 μl hypotonic lysis buffer and another 30 μl SDS loading buffer (5x) and sonified for 10 min at maximum.</p>
-   <h5>SDS-PAGE cast</h5>
+   <h3>SDS-PAGE cast</h3>
 <p>At first the separation gel was cast and covered with 200 μl isopropanol. After polymerisation the collection gel was cast on top.</p>
 <div class="floatleft">
@@ Line 871: / Line 889: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Western blotting</h5>
+   <h3>Western blotting</h3>
 <p>A PVDF-membrane was activated in methanol and washed in transfer buffer (192 mM glycin; 25 mM Tris; 10 % methanol). 3 sheets of whatman paper
@@ Line 878: / Line 896: @@
 membrane - gel - 1 sheet of whatman paper. An amperage of 0.35 A per membrane was supplied for 1.5 h.</p>
-<h3>27.06.2013</h3>
+<h2>27.06.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Antibody treatment</h5>
+   <h3>Antibody treatment</h3>
 <p>Membranes were incubated for 1 h in blocking buffer (PBS with 3 % milk powder), then for 2.5 h with anti HA mouse (1:1000 in blocking buffer). After 3
@@ Line 892: / Line 910: @@
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/a/ac/18_hormon_freiburg_13.png"> </td>
-t=1376232961&w=500&h=292&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:28.06.13_western_blot_nuclear.png"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/1/10/19_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg">  </td>
-t=1376232961&w=500&h=292&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:28.06.13_western_blot_cytoplasmic.jpg">  </td>
 			</tr>
 		</table>
@@ Line 908: / Line 922: @@
 <br>
-<h5>These data suggest that altering the subcellular localization of a Cas9 fusion protein upon a 4-OHT stimulus is not possible. Because     of this it ought to be tested, if the functionality of Cas9 can be controlled by hormone induction. Thus, in a new experiment a SEAP plasmid     should be targeted.</h5>
+<b>These data suggest that altering the subcellular localization of a Cas9 fusion protein upon a 4-OHT stimulus is not possible. Because of this it ought to be tested, if the functionality of Cas9 can be controlled by hormone induction. Thus, in a new experiment a SEAP plasmid should be targeted.</b>
 <br>
@@ Line 915: / Line 929: @@
 pX334a digested with PstI and religated afterwards ("pIG3010") was used as initial plasmid for the introduction of crRNAs (oligos designt for targeting two different SEAP loci).
-<h3>14.07.2013</h3>
-   <h5>Digest of pX334a</h5>
+<div id="july">
+<p id="h2">
+July
+</p>
+</div>
+<h2>14.07.2013</h2>
+   <h3>Digest of pX334a</h3>
 <p>Cas9 was cut out of pX334a to get a plasmid containing only the tracrRNA and the crRNA.</p>
@@ Line 931: / Line 952: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Gel run</h5>
+   <h3>Gel run</h3>
    <div id="floathleft">
 			<table class="gelpic">
 				<tr>
-					<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1374404990&w=500&h=376&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:14.07.13_px334a_digested_with_psti_inv.jpg"> </td>
+					<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/8/85/20_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 				</tr>
 				<tr>
@@ Line 944: / Line 965: @@
 		</div>
-<h3>15.07.2013</h3>
+<h2>15.07.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Gel extraction</h5>
+   <h3>Gel extraction</h3>
 <p>DNA was purified using <i>High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit</i> of Roche.</p>
 <p>Changes to the protocol:
@@ Line 955: / Line 976: @@
 <p>Yield: 30 ng/µl</p>
-   <h5>Religation of pX334a backbone</h5>
+   <h3>Religation of pX334a backbone</h3>
 <div class="floatleft">
 <table class="tabelle">
@@ Line 982: / Line 1,003: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Transformation</h5>
+   <h3>Transformation</h3>
 <div class="floatleft">
 <ol>
@@ Line 996: / Line 1,017: @@
 </div>
-<h3>16.07.2013</h3>
+<h2>16.07.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Picking of colonies</h5>
+   <h3>Picking of colonies</h3>
    <p>4 colonies were spread on a 1/4 plate.</p>
-<h3>17.07.2013</h3>
+<h2>17.07.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Miniprep</h5>
+   <h3>Miniprep</h3>
    <p>DNA was purified using <i>High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit</i> of Roche.</p>
    <p>Yield: ~ 75 ng/µl</p>
-   <h5>Oligo annealing</h5>
+   <h3>Oligo annealing</h3>
    <p>Ordered oligos (single stranded) were annealed to create the insert for the crRNA locus:</p>
    <p> oIG3013 & oIG3014 for Targetsequence I   oIG3015 & oIG3016 for Targetsequence II </p>
@@ Line 1,019: / Line 1,040: @@
    <p> Incubation at 98 °C for 4 min, then let cool down for 3 h (in turned off heating block) </p>
-<h3>18.07.2013</h3>
+<h2>18.07.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Digestion of pIG3010 with BbsI</h5>
+   <h3>Digestion of pIG3010 with BbsI</h3>
    <p>RNA plasmid was opened in order to insert the crRNA coding sequences.</p>
@@ Line 1,035: / Line 1,056: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Gel run</h5>
+   <h3>Gel run</h3>
 <div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1374313897&w=500&h=368&media=18072013gelextraction.jpg"> </td>
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/7/7e/21_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
-                                 <td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1374313897&w=500&h=368&media=18072013gelextraction_ii.jpg"> </td>
+                                 <td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/20/22_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 		</table>
 </div>
-   <h5>Gelextraction</h5>
+   <h3>Gelextraction</h3>
 <p>DNA was purified using <i>High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit</i> of Roche.</p>
 <p>Changes to the protocol:
@@ Line 1,055: / Line 1,076: @@
 <p>Yield: 40 ng/µl</p>
-   <h5>Insertion of annealed Oligos</h5>
+   <h3>Insertion of annealed Oligos</h3>
    <p>Digested pIG3010 was ligated with oligo I or II in a 1:3 or 1:6 ratio.</p>
 <div class="floatleft">
@@ Line 1,069: / Line 1,090: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Transformation</h5>
+   <h3>Transformation</h3>
 <div class="floatleft">
 <ol>
@@ Line 1,083: / Line 1,104: @@
 </div>
-<h3>19.07.2013</h3>
+<h2>19.07.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Picking of colonies</h5>
+   <h3>Picking of colonies</h3>
    <p>2 colonies of each plate were spread on a 1/4 plate.</p>
-<h3>20.07.2013</h3>
+<h2>20.07.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Miniprep</h5>
+   <h3>Miniprep</h3>
    <p>DNA was purified using <i>High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit</i> of Roche.</p>
    <p>Only 1 colony of each ligation approach was prepped.</p>
    <p>Yield: ~ 150 ng/µl</p>
-   <h5>Test digest</h5>
+   <h3>Test digest</h3>
 <div class="floatleft">
 <table class="tabelle">
@@ Line 1,120: / Line 1,141: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Gel run</h5>
+   <h3>Gel run</h3>
 <div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1374404999&w=500&h=376&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:20.07.13_test_digest_pig3011_12_inv.jpg"> </td>
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/c8/23_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 1,135: / Line 1,156: @@
 </div>
-<h3>20.07.2013</h3>
+<h2>20.07.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Colony PCR</h5>
+   <h3>Colony PCR</h3>
 <p>Fwd. primer: fwd. oligo of insert (oIG3013 for pIG3011 & oIG3015 for pIG3012); rev. primer: Gibson primer of Cas9 (oIG3004).</p>
 <p>Control: Fwd. primer: Cas9 sequencing primer (oIG0015); rev. primer: Gibson primer of Cas9 (oIG3004).</p>
@@ Line 1,167: / Line 1,188: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Gel run</h5>
+   <h3>Gel run</h3>
 <div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1374406176&w=500&h=376&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:21.07.13_colony_pcr_of_pig3011_12_inv.jpg"> </td>
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/0/0c/24_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 1,181: / Line 1,202: @@
 </div>
-         <h3> 22.07.2013 </h3>
+         <h2> 22.07.2013 </h2>
-         <h5>Repeat of Insertion of annealed Oligos</h5>
+         <h3>Repeat of Insertion of annealed Oligos</h3>
 <p>Ligation of pIG3010 with SEAP-Oligos I and II.</p>
@@ Line 1,232: / Line 1,253: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Miniprep</h5>
+   <h3>Miniprep</h3>
 <p>DNA of 4 more colonies (2x pIG3011 + 2x pIG3012) were purified using <i>High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit</i> of Roche.</p>
 <p>Yield: ~ 300 ng/µl</p>
-   <h5>Test digest with new colonies</h5>
+   <h3>Test digest with new colonies</h3>
 <div class="floatleft">
 <table class="tabelle">
@@ Line 1,273: / Line 1,294: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Gel run</h5>
+   <h3>Gel run</h3>
 <div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1374519881&w=500&h=376&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:22.07.13_test_digest_pig3011_12_ii.jpg"> </td>
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/8/81/25_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 1,288: / Line 1,309: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Sequencing</h5>
+   <h3>Sequencing</h3>
 <p>pIG3011-65 (1:6 ligation, colony 5) and pIG3012-61 (1:6 ligation, colony 1) were sequenced with oIG0015.</p>
 <p>Both sequencings indicate that the sequenced plasmids are pIG3010. Thus, the BbsI digest did not work.</p>
-<h3>23.07.2013</h3>
+<h2>23.07.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Repeat of opening pIG3010</h5>
+   <h3>Repeat of opening pIG3010</h3>
 <div class="floatleft">
 <table class="tabelle">
@@ Line 1,307: / Line 1,328: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Gel run</h5>
+   <h3>Gel run</h3>
 <div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1374607483&w=500&h=376&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:23.07.13_pig3010_digest_with_bbsi.jpg"> </td>
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/3/38/26_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 1,321: / Line 1,342: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Gel extraction</h5>
+   <h3>Gel extraction</h3>
 <p>DNA were purified using <i>High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit</i> of Roche.</p>
 <p>Changes to the protocol:
@@ Line 1,330: / Line 1,351: @@
 <p>Yield: 120 ng/µl</p>
-<h3> 24.07.2013 </h3>
+<h2> 24.07.2013 </h2>
-         <h5>Repeat of insertion of annealed Oligos</h5>
+         <h3>Repeat of insertion of annealed Oligos</h3>
 <p>Ligation of digested pIG3010 with SEAP-Oligos I and II.</p>
@@ Line 1,381: / Line 1,402: @@
 </div>
-<h3> 25.07.2013 </h3>
+<h2> 25.07.2013 </h2>
-<h5> Coloy PCR on pIG3010 with target sites SEAP </h5>
+<h3> Coloy PCR on pIG3010 with target sites SEAP </h3>
 <p>Colonies were picked and transferred into the following master mix. Afterwards they were streaked out onto plates, containing Amp as selective.</p>
 <p>oIG3013I and 3015II were used as forward primers, oIG3004 as reverse primer.</p>
@@ Line 1,415: / Line 1,436: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Miniprep</h5>
+   <h3>Miniprep</h3>
 <p>DNA of 6 colonies (3x pIG3011 + 3x pIG3012) were purified using <i>High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit</i> of Roche.</p>
 <p>Yield: ~ 30 ng/µl</p>
-<h3>26.07.2013</h3>
+<h2>26.07.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Test digest</h5>
+   <h3>Test digest</h3>
 <div class="floatleft">
 <table class="tabelle">
@@ Line 1,456: / Line 1,477: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Gel run</h5>
+   <h3>Gel run</h3>
 <div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1374849233&w=490&h=499&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:26072013_test_digest_3011_3012.jpg"> </td>
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/da/27_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			<tr>
@@ Line 1,471: / Line 1,492: @@
 </div>
-   <h5>Sequencing</h5>
+   <h3>Sequencing</h3>
 <p>pIG3011_3 and pIG3012_2 were sequenced with oIG0015. Unfortunately they turned out to be undigested pIG3010.</p>
-   <h5>2nd repeat of opening pIG3010</h5>
+   <h3>2nd repeat of opening pIG3010</h3>
 <div>
@@ Line 1,493: / Line 1,514: @@
 </div>
-  <h5>Trafo of digested pIG3010</h5>
+  <h3>Trafo of digested pIG3010</h3>
 <p>To test if there is still undigested plasmid in the sample of digested pIG3010, <i>E. coli</i> were transformed with 40 ng of this sample and - as a control - with 40 ng of undigested pIG3010.</p>
 <div class="floatleft">
@@ Line 1,510: / Line 1,531: @@
-  <h5>Digest of pIG3010 with BbsI (Alina and Philipp)</h5>
+  <h3>Digest of pIG3010 with BbsI (Alina and Philipp)</h3>
 <p> As the digest of pIG3010 seems to have still a lot of undigested backbone, digestion was repeated.</p>
 <div class="floatleft">
@@ Line 1,522: / Line 1,543: @@
 Incabation at 37 °C for 3 h.
 </div>
-<h3> 29.07.2013 </h3>
+<h2> 29.07.2013 </h2>
-         <h5>Repeat of insertion of annealed Oligos</h5>
+         <h3>Repeat of insertion of annealed Oligos</h3>
 <p>Ligation of digested pIG3010 with SEAP-Oligos I and II.</p>
@@ Line 1,572: / Line 1,593: @@
 </div>
-<h3>31.07.2013</h3>
+<h2>31.07.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Miniprep</h5>
+   <h3>Miniprep</h3>
    <p>DNA was purified using <i>High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit</i> of Roche.</p>
    <p>8 colonies of each ligation approach was prepped.</p>
@@ Line 1,580: / Line 1,601: @@
    <p> randomized samples were sent for sequencing. </p>
-<h3>31.07.2013</h3>
+<h2>31.07.2013</h2>
-	<h5> Sequencing results </h5>
+	<h3> Sequencing results </h3>
 		<p> pIG3011_4 and pIG3012_7 proved themselves to be correct. 100ml LB containing Amp were inoculated with these strains, as well as the CMV:SEAP construct.</p>
+<div id="august">
+<p id="h2">
+August
+</p>
+</div>
-<h3>02.08.2013</h3>
+<h2>02.08.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Midiprep of pIG3011 and pIG3012</h5>
+   <h3>Midiprep of pIG3011 and pIG3012</h3>
    <p>DNA was purified using <i>Jetstar Plasmid Purification midi kit</i>.</p>
    <p>Yield: ~  2,5µg/µl</p>
-<h3> 04.08.2013 (Alina & Philipp) </h3>
+<h2> 04.08.2013 (Alina & Philipp) </h2>
-	<h5> Seeding of cells for functioal test of ERT as catalytic inhibitor of CAS9.</h5>
+	<h3> Seeding of cells for functioal test of ERT as catalytic inhibitor of CAS9.</h3>
 		<p> As the plasmids are ready,  HEK293T cells were be seeded in 24 wells with 65.000 cells each well. This will allow a functional test of possible inhibtory effects of Cas9:ERT. A quantitative SEAP essay should give answer to the question wether we can induce CRISPRi via Tamoxifen.Seeding was performed according to standard protocol. </p>
-<h3>06.08.2013</h3>
+<h2>06.08.2013</h2>
-   <h5> Transfection </h5>
+   <h3> Transfection </h3>
 <div class="floatleft">
 Protocol:
@@ Line 1,609: / Line 1,634: @@
 Transfection scheme:
 <div id="floathleft">
-<img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1375891449&w=500&h=295&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:transfection_06.08.13.jpg">
+<img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/5/53/28_hormon_freiburg_13.jpg">
 </div>
-<h3>07.08.2013</h3>
+<h2>07.08.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Medium change</h5>
+   <h3>Medium change</h3>
 h after transfection DMEM complete was removed and replaced by 0.5 ml per well DMEM complete containing 1 µM 4-OHT or 0.1 % EtOH, respectively, according to the transfection scheme.
-<h3>08.08.2013</h3>
+<h2>08.08.2013</h2>
-   <h5>Medium change</h5>
+   <h3>Medium change</h3>
 h later medium was changed again according to the transfection scheme, this time with a washing step (0.5 ml DPBS per well).
-<h3>09.08.2013</h3>
+<h2>09.08.2013</h2>
-   <h5>SEAP measurement</h5>
+   <h3>SEAP measurement</h3>
 <p>The following was done 22 h after the last medium change (58 h after transfection) with technical triplicates.</p>
 <ul>
@@ Line 1,638: / Line 1,663: @@
 <p>Measurement was aborted, as the SEAP concentration was too high.</p>
-<h3>10.08.13</h3>
+<h2>10.08.13</h2>
-   <h5>Repeat of SEAP measurement</h5>
+   <h3>Repeat of SEAP measurement</h3>
 <p>Cell supernatant was diluted 1:10 with DMEM that was heated for 30 min at 65 °C and measurement was repeated.</p>
 <div id="floathleft">
 		<table class="gelpic">
 			<tr>
-				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://wiki.uni-freiburg.de/freigemintern/lib/exe/fetch.php?t=1376237891&w=500&h=291&media=wiki:laborbuecher:michael:10.08.13_results_seap_assay.png"> </td>
+				<td> <img class="gelpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/7/7f/29_hormon_freiburg_13.png"> </td>
 			</tr>
 			</table>