Team:TU-Eindhoven/Preparation

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Construct Design)
(General Design)
Line 16: Line 16:
===General Design===
===General Design===
-
'''In the lab we wished to compare a number of different proteins which led to the design of a general construct in which only the specific protein sequence would need to be adapted for each of the proteins we wished to test. The general constuct can be regarded as follows:'''
+
In the lab we wished to compare a number of different proteins which led to the design of a general construct in which only the specific protein sequence would need to be adapted for each of the proteins we wished to test. The general constuct can be regarded as follows:
<pre>Official iGEM Restriction Sites - FNR Promoter - RBS - M - G - S - S - 6-His Tag - Thrombine Cleavage Site - NheI Restriction Site - Protein Sequence - XhoI Restriction Site - Terminator - Official iGEM Restriction Sites - HindIII Restriction Site</pre>
<pre>Official iGEM Restriction Sites - FNR Promoter - RBS - M - G - S - S - 6-His Tag - Thrombine Cleavage Site - NheI Restriction Site - Protein Sequence - XhoI Restriction Site - Terminator - Official iGEM Restriction Sites - HindIII Restriction Site</pre>

Revision as of 10:02, 24 July 2013

Preparation

Before a start could be made on the lab work it was of course of importance that detailed protocols and plannings were made alongside other preperations. The aim of this page is to provide an overview of these initial steps leading up to the lab work.

Contents

Construct Design

To be able to start work in the lab, DNA constructs, which will form the basis of all our lab work, were designed using GenomeCompiler and oredered at GeneScript. As these constructs will be the basis for such a large part of our labwork it seemed logical for us to go into the details of their design.


General Design

In the lab we wished to compare a number of different proteins which led to the design of a general construct in which only the specific protein sequence would need to be adapted for each of the proteins we wished to test. The general constuct can be regarded as follows:

Official iGEM Restriction Sites - FNR Promoter - RBS - M - G - S - S - 6-His Tag - Thrombine Cleavage Site - NheI Restriction Site - Protein Sequence - XhoI Restriction Site - Terminator - Official iGEM Restriction Sites - HindIII Restriction Site

The general construct was devised in this way to enable us to use this construct for almost all lab experiments meaning no other constructs will have to be designed and ordered seperatly. We will use the EcoRI restriction site in the official iGEM restriction site in combination with the HindIII restriction site to transfer the entire construct from the pUC57-Simple vector in which the construct has been ordered to the pBR322 vector in which we can perform anaerobic experiments, testing the FNR promoter. We can use the NheI and XhoI restriction sites to transfer the protein sequence from the pUC57-Simple vector to the standard pET28a expression vector. Within the pET28a vector the proteins will be brought to expression aerobically allowing for protein purification, quantification and finally CEST imaging. Other parts of the general construct such as the His Tag, Thrombine Cleavage Site and the Terminator sequence have been included to optimise transcription and ultimatly expression.

Protein Design

We will be testing the CEST contrast of 10 different proteins during the course of this project. Alongside this the fluorescent protein EGFP will be used as a control protein for all the experiments. The proteins we will use are mostly consisting of repeating sequences with large numbers of Arginine and Lysine aminoacids. These repeating sequences were chosen for their good CEST qualities McMahonDIACESTM.T. McMahon, New "Multicolor" Polypeptide Diamagnetic Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (DIACEST) Contrast Agents for MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 60, 803-812 (2008).

Of the 10 proteins 4 were preexisting protein and did not need any adaptations (although being rather short we lined multiple repeats of these proteins together.) The remaining 6 were not naturally occurring proteins, and were based on a repeating sequence of either 2, or 4 aminoacids. As these repeating sequences all used the same aminoacids it was of utmost importance to vary the codon sequence as best we could whilst also adhering to the E.coli occurrence frequencies of each codon. To help achieve this goal, a small program was written in Python. Here the E.coli occurrence frequency of each codon was used to randomize the protein sequence whilst maintaining a low Tm for the entire protein and reducing the risk of hairpin forming and dimer forming within the protein. This way we managed to find the in our eyes optimal DNA sequence for both the DNA synthesis and the protein expression later on.

References