Team:UniSalento Lecce/Human Practices

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 249: Line 249:
             </div>
             </div>
                           <br/>
                           <br/>
-
<img style="margin-left:80px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/e2/Single_class_survey_UniSalento_Lecce.jpg" alt="" width="80%">
+
<img style="margin-left:10px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/e2/Single_class_survey_UniSalento_Lecce.jpg" alt="" width="100%">
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>

Revision as of 09:29, 3 October 2013

Human Practices

We thought to share and spread our experience through our University. We organized a seminar for the students from the faculties of Biological Sciences, Biotechnologies and Environmental Sciences, where we talked about iGEM, Synthetic biology and Our project.


We also found interesting to interview some students from previous years' edition, and to broadcast the interviews during the seminar.
Here the video (subbed in italian) :



We must thank Lisa Oberding, from Calgary 2012 team, Yuta Otsuka from UT-Tokyo 2012 team and Luciano Morosi from Buenos Aires 2012 team for their contribution! Thank you guys!

Synthetic biology: the survey

To analyze how much synthetic biology, its applications and its ethical implications are known in our academic world, we decided di submit a short survey. We submitted it to professors, researchers, doctoral students and non graduate students. Here the survey and the results.
In 1974, the Polish geneticist Wacław Szybalski used the term "synthetic biology", writing:
"Let me now comment on the question "what next". Up to now we are working on the descriptive phase of molecular biology. ... But the real challenge will start when we enter the synthetic biology phase of research in our field. We will then devise new control elements and add these new modules to the existing genomes or build up wholly new genomes. This would be a field with the unlimited expansion potential and hardly any limitations to building "new better control circuits" and ..... finally other "synthetic" organisms, like a "new better mouse". ... I am not concerned that we will run out of exciting and novel ideas, ... in the synthetic biology, in general."

A) Did you know the term Synthetic Biology (as an evolution of the concept of Genetic Engineering)?


1. I know it and i know about its applications.
2. I have some ideas, but not so clear.
3. I never heard about it.

B) Given the possibility to engineer an organism to perform a given function in a controlled way, which perspectives can be profiled, in your opinion?


1. I have great expectations for applications in Human health.
2. I think that this kind of research will never come out of laboratories.
3. I think it may profile scenarios of genetic pollution.
4. I have no idea.

C) “Everything you can imagine, Nature has already created”, quoting A. Einstein. You think that:


1. Researchers are arrogant when they think of improving nature.
2. It is important that science could take advantage of theoretical knowledge for applicative uses.
3. The efforts of research could never overcome the efficiency of natural systems.
4. I have no interest in these implications.

D) In which field you think that Synthetic Biology may have better applications?


1. Environmental (e.g. Bioremediation, Biosensors)
2. Biomedical (e.g. New Therapies, Diagnostics)
3. Food and Agriculture (e.g. Product improvement, Toxicology)
4. Energetic (e.g. Renewable resources, Improved biomass)




Single categories: the answers!




Back to Top