Team:Valencia-CIPF/Safety

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 38: Line 38:
<li><b>Regarding our microorganisms</b>
<li><b>Regarding our microorganisms</b>
 +
<br>
 +
The two organisms used in our lab were <i>E. coli</i> and <i>S. cerevisiae</i>.
 +
<br></br>
 +
<i>E. coli</i> is a gram-negative enterobacterium naturally found in the colon of warm-blooded organisms. It can be a potential pathogen for humans, as some strains are the cause of serious food poisoning in humans. The strain used in our lab was DH5 alpha, which belong to the risk group 1, so good laboratory practises were applied to avoid possible contaminations.
 +
<br></br>
 +
<i>S. cerevisiae</i> is a unicellular yeast. The strain used was BY4741, which is in risk group 1.
 +
<br></br>
 +
Our construct does not raise any safety issues. It can neither give pathogenicity to the microorganisms where it is inserted nor encode for any toxin.
 +
<br></br>
 +
The devices used in our project should also represent no hazard for public health or environmental safety, and it should not suppose a problem due to the fact that it is a decorative device and it does not require to be manipulated. In any case, it could involve an ethic problem since yeast is a widely well-known microorganism, but it will be genetically modified.
 +
<br></br>
 +
<li><b>Management of chemicals</b>
<li><b>Management of chemicals</b>
 +
<br>
 +
We got separated racks for every kind of chemical product used, besides ensure all products were properly labelled.
 +
<br></br>
 +
In addition, we had a special and isolated room for the use of EtBr, as it is highly mutagenic and dangerous for users. This room was fully equipped with special glasses and gloves to prevent contamination of the rest of the lab by this reactant. Special bins were also used for the gels.
 +
<br></br>
 +
<li><b>Is there a local biosafety group, committee or review board at your institution?</b>
<li><b>Is there a local biosafety group, committee or review board at your institution?</b>
<li><b>Our project... trying to imagine a safer world</b>
<li><b>Our project... trying to imagine a safer world</b>

Revision as of 17:58, 4 October 2013



Safety

  1. Concerning our institution.
    The Polytechnic University of Valencia (as well as the Catholic University and CIPF) has a solid manual of good laboratory practices, covering several aspects such as signalling, cleaning, waste management, security, emergency situations and more. Our team has worked according to this manual and under the supervision of the experts in the lab.

  2. Safety in the lab.
    As in every lab, conventional protection is used: gloves, lab coat and glasses if necessary. Such items of equipment avoid contaminations and also protect the worker and the environment.


    Figure 1. Gloves, glasses and lab coat.


    Concerning management of waste, chemical and biological waste must be managed properly before disposal.

    When biological residues are produced, like petri dishes with microorganisms, they must be autoclaved before being discarded in the classical way.

    In the case of chemical waste, it must be stored in special tanks to be managed by specialist on a monthly basis together with all similar waste produce in in the same campus or organization.


    Figure 2. Container for a chemical waste.


    In spite of the lack of safety experts in our team, we have been lucky to work in a laboratory where all protocols and equipments were ready to ensure safety.

  3. Regarding our microorganisms
    The two organisms used in our lab were E. coli and S. cerevisiae.

    E. coli is a gram-negative enterobacterium naturally found in the colon of warm-blooded organisms. It can be a potential pathogen for humans, as some strains are the cause of serious food poisoning in humans. The strain used in our lab was DH5 alpha, which belong to the risk group 1, so good laboratory practises were applied to avoid possible contaminations.

    S. cerevisiae is a unicellular yeast. The strain used was BY4741, which is in risk group 1.

    Our construct does not raise any safety issues. It can neither give pathogenicity to the microorganisms where it is inserted nor encode for any toxin.

    The devices used in our project should also represent no hazard for public health or environmental safety, and it should not suppose a problem due to the fact that it is a decorative device and it does not require to be manipulated. In any case, it could involve an ethic problem since yeast is a widely well-known microorganism, but it will be genetically modified.

  4. Management of chemicals
    We got separated racks for every kind of chemical product used, besides ensure all products were properly labelled.

    In addition, we had a special and isolated room for the use of EtBr, as it is highly mutagenic and dangerous for users. This room was fully equipped with special glasses and gloves to prevent contamination of the rest of the lab by this reactant. Special bins were also used for the gels.

  5. Is there a local biosafety group, committee or review board at your institution?
  6. Our project... trying to imagine a safer world