Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Biosafety/Biosafety System

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 80: Line 80:
==Theory==
==Theory==
-
Our three biosafety systems are all based on an induced repressor system. As shown in the illustration below an inducer activates a promoter which expresses the repressor gene which delays a second promoter in front of a gene. This inducer can be a substrate like L-rhamnose or a product which the organism produces and delays the expression of a gene. This is an advantage because the organism only produces products when it is necessary so the metabolic stress is lower. This delay can be executed in different ways. For example the repressor araC in our [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Biosafety/Biosafety_System_S araCtive] system regulates negatively the pBAD promoter by building up a dimer, which builds a DNA loop and inhibits the binding of the RNA-polymerase. So this example stands for a structural change of the DNA. This function can be found in our [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Biosafety/Biosafety_System_L Lac of Growth] system.
+
Biosafety is an important aspect of Synthetic Biology, because it deals with the interaction of the environment and mankind. Several studies deal with the interaction of genetically modified bacteria and natural wild types. Mostly with the result that genetically modified bacteria does not influence the environment, but there is always a risk remaining. Because the genetically modified bacteria are adapted to the excellent conditions of the laboratory, the natural bacteria will outlast this modified strains in nature. So the genetically modified bacteria will not survive because of these evolutionary disadvantage. But there is no guarantee that there is really no interaction and that their release does not effect the equilibrium of the environment. To avoid these problems we also thought of a cell free fuel cell based on enzymes, but this is even more complex and would not be as efficient because of the limited activity of the enzymes. So the questions was, how will an approach as our microbial fuel cell, with genetic modified bacteria for a higher production of energy find application outside the laboratory, without effecting the nature?<br>
 +
 
 +
 
<br>
<br>
Another example for a second way the repressor acts is a direct interaction between the repressor and the operator. The repressor and the operator build a complex which the RNA polymerase can’t overcome. So the repressor blocks the RNA polymerase.
Another example for a second way the repressor acts is a direct interaction between the repressor and the operator. The repressor and the operator build a complex which the RNA polymerase can’t overcome. So the repressor blocks the RNA polymerase.

Revision as of 02:27, 5 October 2013



Biosafety System


Overview

IGEM Bielefeld 2013 Biosafety E.coli bewaffnet safe 2..png

Biosafety is an essential aspect when taking part in iGEM especially when you work with living organisms which could possibly get out of your application by damage or incorrect handling. In order to counter this problem there exist useful systems to prevent the bacteria from escaping or killing the bacteria when they are outside of the application. To complement this archive we constructed not only one system but also three systems which differ in leakiness and strength. For this approach we combined two common Biosafety-ideas, an auxotrophy and a toxic gene product, in one device. So the constructed Biosafety-System takes the best of this two approaches and is characterized by a double kill-swtich system. This double kill-switch mechanism provides additional a higher plasmid stability and a higher resistance towards undesirable mutations. In one sentence: Our Biosafety-System is safe!







Theory

Biosafety is an important aspect of Synthetic Biology, because it deals with the interaction of the environment and mankind. Several studies deal with the interaction of genetically modified bacteria and natural wild types. Mostly with the result that genetically modified bacteria does not influence the environment, but there is always a risk remaining. Because the genetically modified bacteria are adapted to the excellent conditions of the laboratory, the natural bacteria will outlast this modified strains in nature. So the genetically modified bacteria will not survive because of these evolutionary disadvantage. But there is no guarantee that there is really no interaction and that their release does not effect the equilibrium of the environment. To avoid these problems we also thought of a cell free fuel cell based on enzymes, but this is even more complex and would not be as efficient because of the limited activity of the enzymes. So the questions was, how will an approach as our microbial fuel cell, with genetic modified bacteria for a higher production of energy find application outside the laboratory, without effecting the nature?



Another example for a second way the repressor acts is a direct interaction between the repressor and the operator. The repressor and the operator build a complex which the RNA polymerase can’t overcome. So the repressor blocks the RNA polymerase.

FigureX:...
FigureX:...
FigureX:...

Results

Figure X: sepcific production rate.
Figure X: sepcific production rate.
Figure X: sepcific production rate.


References

  • Autoren (Jahr) Titel [Link|Paper Ausgabe: Seiten].









Contents