Team:Calgary/Project/OurSensor/Modelling

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(11 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
width: 300px;
width: 300px;
margin: 5px;
margin: 5px;
 +
min-height: 330px;
}
}
Line 23: Line 24:
background: #EBA059 !important;
background: #EBA059 !important;
}
}
 +
 +
#Button1 img{
 +
margin-top: 50px;
 +
}
#Button2{
#Button2{
Line 43: Line 48:
<h1>Modelling</h1>
<h1>Modelling</h1>
-
<p>The questions which the modelling team set out to answer were inspired by the questions the biologists were asking in the wetlab. We had to select a reporter enzyme that would be effective and durable for our lateral flow strip system. As we scrutinized how reporters, the detector, and other biological devices could merge together in our sensor, we realized these modular protein components could be assembled in many configurations. We were eager to learn the optimal configuration in which they could be combined to be most effective in our prototype.</p>
+
<p>The questions which the modelling team set out to answer were <span class="Yellow"><b>inspired by the questions</span></b> the wetlab groups were asking. We had to select a reporter enzyme that would be effective and durable for our lateral flow strip system. As we scrutinized how reporters, the detector, and other biological devices could merge together in our sensor, we realized these modular protein components could be assembled in many configurations. We were eager to learn the optimal configuration in which they could be combined to be most effective in our prototype so that we could <span class="Yellow"><b>inform the direction of our experiments</b></span> in the wetlab. We aimed to understand how the system would work so that we could develop the best system possible to impact the lives of those this system could impact.</p>
-
<p>To reduce the number of wet lab experiments to develop our sensor, we followed a two-pronged modelling approach to help answer some of these questions. First, we used spatial models in Autodesk Maya in which we assembled and animated 3D protein structures for insight into they’d function in prototype. Also, we analyzed the kinetic properties of several common reporter enzymes, culminating in our selection of two novel reporters. Finally, we deployed a quantitative Mathematica prototype model to test how amounts of target DNA versus detector proteins would influence sensitivity of our lateral flow strip.</p>
+
<p>To reduce the number of wet lab experiments to develop our sensor, we followed a <span class="yellow"><b>two-pronged modelling approach</b></span> to help answer our questions. First, we used spatial models in Autodesk Maya in which we assembled and animated 3D protein structures for insight into their function in the prototype. Also, we analyzed the kinetic properties of several common reporter enzymes, culminating in our selection of two novel reporters. Finally, we deployed a quantitative Mathematica prototype model to test how amounts of target DNA versus detector proteins would influence sensitivity of our lateral flow strip, and a Scilab differential model to predict how our final system would function.</p>
<section id="ButtonsSection">
<section id="ButtonsSection">
Line 51: Line 56:
<a href="https://2013.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:Calgary/Project/OurSensor/Modelling/SpatialModelling">
<a href="https://2013.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:Calgary/Project/OurSensor/Modelling/SpatialModelling">
<div id="Button1" class="Button">
<div id="Button1" class="Button">
-
<h2>Spatial Model</h2>
+
<h2>Spatial<br>Modelling</h2><br>
-
<img style="width:85%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/f/f8/Calgary_Spatial_Icon.png">
+
<img style="width:90%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/f/f8/Calgary_Spatial_Icon.png">
<p></p>
<p></p>
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 01:14, 20 October 2013

Modelling

The questions which the modelling team set out to answer were inspired by the questions the wetlab groups were asking. We had to select a reporter enzyme that would be effective and durable for our lateral flow strip system. As we scrutinized how reporters, the detector, and other biological devices could merge together in our sensor, we realized these modular protein components could be assembled in many configurations. We were eager to learn the optimal configuration in which they could be combined to be most effective in our prototype so that we could inform the direction of our experiments in the wetlab. We aimed to understand how the system would work so that we could develop the best system possible to impact the lives of those this system could impact.

To reduce the number of wet lab experiments to develop our sensor, we followed a two-pronged modelling approach to help answer our questions. First, we used spatial models in Autodesk Maya in which we assembled and animated 3D protein structures for insight into their function in the prototype. Also, we analyzed the kinetic properties of several common reporter enzymes, culminating in our selection of two novel reporters. Finally, we deployed a quantitative Mathematica prototype model to test how amounts of target DNA versus detector proteins would influence sensitivity of our lateral flow strip, and a Scilab differential model to predict how our final system would function.