Http://2013.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Sandbox/Project/Detector/ProofofConceptTALEs

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 5: Line 5:
<p>
<p>
-
The TALEs are a very fundamental part of our project this year. In order to have a functioning system for <i> E. coli </i> detection, we need to have proteins that will successfully recognize and bind our DNA. However, before we can actually create and use TALEs to bind to <i> E. coli </i>DNA, we need to have a proof of concept. On the iGEM parts registry we came across TALEs that the Slovenian team synthesized for a previous project. TALEs are very large proteins and take a long time to design and synthesize. Therefore, we decided to use these TALEs to test our system. We also saw this as an opportunity to use and build upon parts made by former iGEM teams. Thus, we ordered their three TALEs: TALE A (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K782004" >BBa_K782004</a>), TALE B, and TALE D.
+
The TALEs are a very fundamental part of our project this year. In order to have a functioning system for <i> E. coli </i> detection, we need to have proteins that will successfully recognize and bind our DNA. However, before we can actually create and use TALEs to bind to <i> E. coli </i>DNA, we need to have a proof of concept. On the iGEM parts registry we came across TALEs that the Slovenian team synthesized for a previous project. TALEs are very large proteins and take a long time to design and synthesize. Therefore, we decided to use these TALEs to test our system. We also saw this as an opportunity to use and build upon parts made by former iGEM teams. Thus, we ordered their three TALEs: TALE A (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K782004" >BBa_K782004</a>), TALE B (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K782006" >BBa_K782006</a>), and TALE D.
</p>
</p>
<p>
<p>
-
  We used TALE A(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K782004" >BBa_K782004</a>) and TALE B to build our constructs and test our system, as it requires the use of two different TALE proteins. To test our TALEs, we had to synthesize the target sequences that they would recognize and bind to. We constructed a series of target sequences in order to test the binding affinity. Some sequences were directly corresponding with the TALE protein sequence, while some had certain base pair alterations. These mutations will allow us to test the binding affinity of the TALE when it encounters a non-exact target sequence. In this way, we can determine how specific these proteins really are and how they might respond in our test to DNA not belonging to enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) <i> E. coli. </i> This will help us define how specific we expect our final system to be.  
+
  We used TALE A(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K782004" >BBa_K782004</a>) and TALE B (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K782006" >BBa_K782006</a>) to build our constructs and test our system, as it requires the use of two different TALE proteins. To test our TALEs, we had to synthesize the target sequences that they would recognize and bind to. We constructed a series of target sequences in order to test the binding affinity. Some sequences were directly corresponding with the TALE protein sequence, while some had certain base pair alterations. These mutations will allow us to test the binding affinity of the TALE when it encounters a non-exact target sequence. In this way, we can determine how specific these proteins really are and how they might respond in our test to DNA not belonging to enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) <i> E. coli. </i> This will help us define how specific we expect our final system to be.  
</p>
</p>
<p>
<p>
-
  When we sequenced TALE B, we discovered that it had a small mutated segment. We expected a sequence of AGCAATGGG in the repeat variable diresidue of the second repeat. However, the sequence was actually TCCCACGAC. This means that the required target sequence at this position is a C, and not a T, as we had thought.  The two TALEs also had a kozak sequence at the front of the sequence. Instead of changing the TALE, we decided to create a new series of target sequences for the mutated TALE B to bind to. We also used PCR to remove the kozak sequence at the front of each TALE, so it would not interfere with our system.  
+
  When we sequenced TALE B (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K782006" >BBa_K782006</a>), we discovered that it had a small mutated segment. We expected a sequence of AGCAATGGG in the repeat variable diresidue of the second repeat. However, the sequence was actually TCCCACGAC. This means that the required target sequence at this position is a C, and not a T, as we had thought.  The two TALEs also had a kozak sequence at the front of the sequence. Instead of changing the TALE, we decided to create a new series of target sequences for the mutated TALE B (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K782006" >BBa_K782006</a>) to bind to. We also used PCR to remove the kozak sequence at the front of each TALE, so it would not interfere with our system.  
</p>
</p>
<p>
<p>
-
Having target sequences created for both TALE A(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K782004" >BBa_K782004</a>) and TALE B, we assembled a target sequence construct, to be used in our system. Special primers were synthesized and used to create a linear PCR product, containing both the A and B target sequences. We then put it into a pSB1C3 backbone by switching out RFP.   
+
Having target sequences created for both TALE A(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K782004" >BBa_K782004</a>) and TALE B (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K782006" >BBa_K782006</a>), we assembled a target sequence construct, to be used in our system. Special primers were synthesized and used to create a linear PCR product, containing both the A and B target sequences. We then put it into a pSB1C3 backbone by switching out RFP.   
</p>
</p>

Revision as of 00:21, 20 September 2013

Registry TALEs

The TALEs are a very fundamental part of our project this year. In order to have a functioning system for E. coli detection, we need to have proteins that will successfully recognize and bind our DNA. However, before we can actually create and use TALEs to bind to E. coli DNA, we need to have a proof of concept. On the iGEM parts registry we came across TALEs that the Slovenian team synthesized for a previous project. TALEs are very large proteins and take a long time to design and synthesize. Therefore, we decided to use these TALEs to test our system. We also saw this as an opportunity to use and build upon parts made by former iGEM teams. Thus, we ordered their three TALEs: TALE A (BBa_K782004), TALE B (BBa_K782006), and TALE D.

We used TALE A(BBa_K782004) and TALE B (BBa_K782006) to build our constructs and test our system, as it requires the use of two different TALE proteins. To test our TALEs, we had to synthesize the target sequences that they would recognize and bind to. We constructed a series of target sequences in order to test the binding affinity. Some sequences were directly corresponding with the TALE protein sequence, while some had certain base pair alterations. These mutations will allow us to test the binding affinity of the TALE when it encounters a non-exact target sequence. In this way, we can determine how specific these proteins really are and how they might respond in our test to DNA not belonging to enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) E. coli. This will help us define how specific we expect our final system to be.

When we sequenced TALE B (BBa_K782006), we discovered that it had a small mutated segment. We expected a sequence of AGCAATGGG in the repeat variable diresidue of the second repeat. However, the sequence was actually TCCCACGAC. This means that the required target sequence at this position is a C, and not a T, as we had thought. The two TALEs also had a kozak sequence at the front of the sequence. Instead of changing the TALE, we decided to create a new series of target sequences for the mutated TALE B (BBa_K782006) to bind to. We also used PCR to remove the kozak sequence at the front of each TALE, so it would not interfere with our system.

Having target sequences created for both TALE A(BBa_K782004) and TALE B (BBa_K782006), we assembled a target sequence construct, to be used in our system. Special primers were synthesized and used to create a linear PCR product, containing both the A and B target sequences. We then put it into a pSB1C3 backbone by switching out RFP.

With the TALEs ordered from the registry and our correct TALE target sequences, we have been able to demonstrate a proof of concept by binding TALE proteins with DNA. Next, we will use our designed TALEs to bind to the DNA of EHEC E. coli .