"
Team:Freiburg/Project/modeling
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
| - | <table class="imgtxt"> | + | <table id="Fig1" class="imgtxt"> |
<tbody><tr> | <tbody><tr> | ||
<td> <img id="bild" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/bc/Freiburg2013_AktivierungGraphik_fertig.png"> </td> | <td> <img id="bild" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/bc/Freiburg2013_AktivierungGraphik_fertig.png"> </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| - | <td> <b | + | <td> <b >Fig. 1: Transcriptional Activation via dCAS-VP16:</b><br> The dCAS-VP16 fusion protein is guided to the desired DNA |
sequence by a co-expressed crRNA and tracrRNA. The binding of the gene recognition complex leads to an expression of SEAP. </td> | sequence by a co-expressed crRNA and tracrRNA. The binding of the gene recognition complex leads to an expression of SEAP. </td> | ||
| Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
| - | <table class="imgtxt"> | + | <table id="Fig2" class="imgtxt"> |
<tbody><tr> | <tbody><tr> | ||
<td> <img id="bild" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/f/fd/Freiburg2013_Repression_Modeling.png"> </td> | <td> <img id="bild" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/f/fd/Freiburg2013_Repression_Modeling.png"> </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| - | <td> <b | + | <td> <b > Fig. 2: Transcriptional respression via dCAS-KRAB:</b><br> The dCAS-KRAB fusion protein binds to the desired target sequence at a different loci than the tetR, that binds to tetO and is assumed to repress SEAP production. </td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</tbody></table> | </tbody></table> | ||
| Line 227: | Line 227: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
| - | <table class="gelpic"> | + | <table id="Fig3" class="gelpic"> |
<tbody><tr> | <tbody><tr> | ||
<td> <img id="bild" style="width:400px text-align:center" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/25/Freiburg2013_3D-example.png"> </td> | <td> <img id="bild" style="width:400px text-align:center" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/25/Freiburg2013_3D-example.png"> </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| - | <td> <b | + | <td> <b >Fig. 3: Example of a minimization problem.</b><br> Shown is a 3D landscape. Depending on the start position (the initial parameters), the found minimum is either a local or the global one.</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</tbody></table> | </tbody></table> | ||
| Line 245: | Line 245: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
| - | <table class="gelpic"> | + | <table id="Fig4" class="gelpic"> |
<tbody><tr> | <tbody><tr> | ||
<td> <img id="bild" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/f/fa/Freiburg2013_Lhs_design_erklaerung.png"> </td> | <td> <img id="bild" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/f/fa/Freiburg2013_Lhs_design_erklaerung.png"> </td> | ||
| - | <td> <b | + | <td> <b >Fig. 4: Illustration of the latin hypercube sampling in a two dimensional parameter space.</b><br> The number of initial parameter vectors is 5. Therefore the parameter space is divided in 25 subspaces. Shown is one possible parameter combination.</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</tbody></table> | </tbody></table> | ||
| Line 277: | Line 277: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
| - | <table class="gelpic"> | + | <table id="Fig5" class="gelpic"> |
<tbody><tr> | <tbody><tr> | ||
<td> <img id="bild" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/f/fc/Freiburg2013-Act500_fertig.png"> </td> | <td> <img id="bild" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/f/fc/Freiburg2013-Act500_fertig.png"> </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| - | <td> <b | + | <td> <b >Fig. 5: Modeling Result:</b><br> Shown are the experimental results (purple square) in comparison to the model prediction values (cyan cross) for SEAP and Cas, as well as the model prediction for not measured components </td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</tbody></table> | </tbody></table> | ||
| Line 290: | Line 290: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
| - | <table class="gelpic"> | + | <table id="Fig6" class="gelpic"> |
<tbody><tr> | <tbody><tr> | ||
<td> <img id="bild" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/1/1b/Freiburg2013_Akt500_fehler1_1.png"> </td> | <td> <img id="bild" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/1/1b/Freiburg2013_Akt500_fehler1_1.png"> </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| - | <td> <b | + | <td> <b >Fig. 6: Different error values plotted in increasing order.</b><br> </td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</tbody></table> | </tbody></table> | ||
| Line 308: | Line 308: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
| - | <table class="gelpic"> | + | <table id="Fig7" class="gelpic"> |
<tbody><tr> | <tbody><tr> | ||
<td> <img id="bild" src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/4/47/Freiburg2013_Rep100_1.png"> </td> | <td> <img id="bild" src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/4/47/Freiburg2013_Rep100_1.png"> </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| - | <td> <b | + | <td> <b >Fig. 7: Modeling Result:</b><br> Shown are the experimental results (purple square) in comparison to the model prediction values (cyan cross) for SEAP and Cas, as well as the model prediction for not measured components </td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</tbody></table> | </tbody></table> | ||
| Line 321: | Line 321: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
| - | <table class="gelpic"> | + | <table id="Fig8" class="gelpic"> |
<tbody><tr> | <tbody><tr> | ||
<td> <img id="bild" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/d9/Rep100_Fehler1.png"> </td> | <td> <img id="bild" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/d9/Rep100_Fehler1.png"> </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| - | <td> <b | + | <td> <b >Fig. 8: Different error values plotted in increasing order.</b><br> </td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</tbody></table> | </tbody></table> | ||
Revision as of 16:20, 3 October 2013
Modeling our dCAS
Introduction
We used a thermodynamic approach to model and characterize our system. It is based on various ordinary differential equations (ODE) that describe the behaviour of our network. Due to the limited measurment possibilities and the unwritten law, that you should at least measure half of the number of components of your network we started by using a small network with a limited amount of different components.
The Networks
1. dCAS-VP16
Our network includes four different components dCas-VP16, a RNA complex (tracr/cr RNA), a RNA-dCas-VP16 complex and the Secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP). DCas-VP16 binds the RNA-complex and the whole complex binds the DNA, which leads to the production of SEAP.
 |
| Fig. 1: Transcriptional Activation via dCAS-VP16: The dCAS-VP16 fusion protein is guided to the desired DNA sequence by a co-expressed crRNA and tracrRNA. The binding of the gene recognition complex leads to an expression of SEAP. |
Setting up the ODE
According to the graphical reaction network the ODE can be set up.
Cas9 is constitutively expressed by the CBh promoter and degraded proportional to the current concentration. It is used to build the DNA recognition complex and produced during complex decay.
The RNA-complex is build linearly. The production constant can be seen as production constant of the lower expressed RNA, because this expression limits the complex building. It is assumed that the RNA is degraded after DNA recognition complex decay and therefore the complex decay does not lead to more RNA.
The DNA recognition complex is built, when Cas9 and RNA meets and degraded proportional to the current DNA recognition complex concentration.
There is a leaky SEAP production and one that depends on the current concentration of the Cas9/RNA Complex. This dependency is assumed to follow the Monod-kinetic. Because of the long half time (T2 > 500 h) of SEAP we can neglect the SEAP decay [2, 3].
| The parameters are: | |
|---|---|
| k1: linear production rate of Cas9 k2: Cas9 degradation rate k3: tracr/crRNA production rate k4: tracr/crRNA degradation rate k5: gene recognition complex building rate |
k6: cr/trRNA /Cas9 degradation rate k7: SEAPs leaky production rate k8: Complex dependent SEAP production rate k9: |
Sources
(1) Lagarias, J. C., J. A. Reeds, M. H. Wright, and P. E. Wright.
(1998). Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions." SIAM Journal of Optimization, Vol. 9, Number 1,
112–147
.
(2) Müller K, Engesser R, Metzger S, Schulz S, Kämpf MM, Busacker M, Steinberg T, Tomakidi P, Ehrbar M, Nagy F, Timmer J, Zubriggen MD, Weber W.
(2013). A red/far-red light-responsive bi-stable toggle switch to control gene expression in mammalian cells. Nucleic acids research 41:e77.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3627562&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
.
(3) Müller K, Engesser R, Metzger S, Schulz S, Kämpf MM, Busacker M, Steinberg T, Tomakidi P, Ehrbar M, Nagy F, Zubriggen MD, Weber W.
(2013). A red / far-red light-responsive bi-stable toggle switch to control gene expression in mammalian cells Supplementary Information . Design and parameterization of the mathematical model.
The Code Files
