"
Team:Bielefeld-Germany/HumanPractice/Biosafety Motivation
From 2013.igem.org
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| - | <p align="justify"> One important part of our project is to design safety systems. It is essential to reduce risks which could possibly endanger environment or public. Especially in Germany | + | <p align="justify"> One important part of our project is to design safety systems. It is essential to reduce risks which could possibly endanger the environment or the public. Especially in Germany the discussion about genetically modified systems is always present in the media. The German public is very critical to Synthetic Biology in food. A [http://www.gentechnikfreie-regionen.de/hintergruende/studien/umfragen.html survey] was published by "BUND" which shows that ¾ of the thousand asked Germans want etiquettes which declare if a product is produced without genetic engineering. When these consumers had the opportunity to choose between two products, one with the etiquette and one without it, they would prefer buying the one with the declaration. “Die Welt”, a big German news agency, published 2012 an [http://www.welt.de/debatte/kommentare/article112053115/Deutschland-versperrt-sich-dem-Fortschritt.html article] about the fact that Germany should use the genetic engineering and should not defeat it. The German public is frightened about genetic because they didn’t know much about it. Movies strengthen this fear when showing that genetic engineering is a huge risk which can cause a super virus which transforms humans into zombies like in “28 days later”. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
“On 20 May 2010, researchers at the J. Craig Venter Institute announced the creation of the first synthetic bacterium, whose genome had entirely been synthesized in the lab. At a press conference, biologist Craig Venter stated: “This is the first self-replicating species that we’ve had on the planet whose parent is a computer.”(ABCnews, 2010). Only a few weeks later, the movie Splice was released in the United States (US). The film tells the story of two young scientists who engineer new synthetic creatures in the lab by combining DNA from different organisms. The concomitance of Venter’s alleged breakthrough in synthetic biology (SB) and the movie’s start in the US cinemas at almost the same time can certainly be seen as pure coincidence. Although it goes without doubt that the film makers have largely been inspired by research currently done in the field of SB and even advised by a group of scientists. Nevertheless, such parallels between fiction and reality as exemplified here are very likely to influence the awareness and perception by the audience of this new and emerging field of biology” (Meyer A. et al. (2013): Frankenstein 2.0.: Identifying and characterizing synthetic biology engineers in science fiction films, In: Life Sciences, Society and Policy 2013, 9:9, doi:10.1186/2195-7819-9-9 ). | “On 20 May 2010, researchers at the J. Craig Venter Institute announced the creation of the first synthetic bacterium, whose genome had entirely been synthesized in the lab. At a press conference, biologist Craig Venter stated: “This is the first self-replicating species that we’ve had on the planet whose parent is a computer.”(ABCnews, 2010). Only a few weeks later, the movie Splice was released in the United States (US). The film tells the story of two young scientists who engineer new synthetic creatures in the lab by combining DNA from different organisms. The concomitance of Venter’s alleged breakthrough in synthetic biology (SB) and the movie’s start in the US cinemas at almost the same time can certainly be seen as pure coincidence. Although it goes without doubt that the film makers have largely been inspired by research currently done in the field of SB and even advised by a group of scientists. Nevertheless, such parallels between fiction and reality as exemplified here are very likely to influence the awareness and perception by the audience of this new and emerging field of biology” (Meyer A. et al. (2013): Frankenstein 2.0.: Identifying and characterizing synthetic biology engineers in science fiction films, In: Life Sciences, Society and Policy 2013, 9:9, doi:10.1186/2195-7819-9-9 ). | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| - | Our aim is to inform the German society that Synthetic Biology is a huge advantage which has got unused potential if it is applied responsibly. Because of this we organized a Synbioday with other German iGEM teams. We asked the public about synthetic biology and what they think about genetic engineering. The results | + | Our aim is to inform the German society that Synthetic Biology is a huge advantage which has got unused potential if it is applied responsibly. Because of this we organized a Synbioday with other German iGEM teams. We asked the public about synthetic biology and what they think about genetic engineering. The results of our survey are listened [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Human_Practice/Day_of_Synthetic_Biology here]. </p> |
Revision as of 20:14, 4 October 2013
Biosafety Motivation
Abstract
One important part of our project is to design safety systems. It is essential to reduce risks which could possibly endanger the environment or the public. Especially in Germany the discussion about genetically modified systems is always present in the media. The German public is very critical to Synthetic Biology in food. A [http://www.gentechnikfreie-regionen.de/hintergruende/studien/umfragen.html survey] was published by "BUND" which shows that ¾ of the thousand asked Germans want etiquettes which declare if a product is produced without genetic engineering. When these consumers had the opportunity to choose between two products, one with the etiquette and one without it, they would prefer buying the one with the declaration. “Die Welt”, a big German news agency, published 2012 an [http://www.welt.de/debatte/kommentare/article112053115/Deutschland-versperrt-sich-dem-Fortschritt.html article] about the fact that Germany should use the genetic engineering and should not defeat it. The German public is frightened about genetic because they didn’t know much about it. Movies strengthen this fear when showing that genetic engineering is a huge risk which can cause a super virus which transforms humans into zombies like in “28 days later”.
“On 20 May 2010, researchers at the J. Craig Venter Institute announced the creation of the first synthetic bacterium, whose genome had entirely been synthesized in the lab. At a press conference, biologist Craig Venter stated: “This is the first self-replicating species that we’ve had on the planet whose parent is a computer.”(ABCnews, 2010). Only a few weeks later, the movie Splice was released in the United States (US). The film tells the story of two young scientists who engineer new synthetic creatures in the lab by combining DNA from different organisms. The concomitance of Venter’s alleged breakthrough in synthetic biology (SB) and the movie’s start in the US cinemas at almost the same time can certainly be seen as pure coincidence. Although it goes without doubt that the film makers have largely been inspired by research currently done in the field of SB and even advised by a group of scientists. Nevertheless, such parallels between fiction and reality as exemplified here are very likely to influence the awareness and perception by the audience of this new and emerging field of biology” (Meyer A. et al. (2013): Frankenstein 2.0.: Identifying and characterizing synthetic biology engineers in science fiction films, In: Life Sciences, Society and Policy 2013, 9:9, doi:10.1186/2195-7819-9-9 ).
Our aim is to inform the German society that Synthetic Biology is a huge advantage which has got unused potential if it is applied responsibly. Because of this we organized a Synbioday with other German iGEM teams. We asked the public about synthetic biology and what they think about genetic engineering. The results of our survey are listened here.
