Prussian Blue Ferritin

What is Ferritin?

Ferritin is a ubiquitous iron storage protein found in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes allowing cells to keep iron in a soluble and non-toxic form. Ferritin across different species has very similar architecture and function. This is in despite of variations at the primary structure level (Harrison and Arosio, 1996). The 450 kDa protein shell consists of 24 subunits that can be composed of both heavy and light chains (Lawson et al., 1991) (Figure 1). Inside of this shell is room for an iron core composed of up to 4500 Fe (III) atoms stored as ferrihydrite phosphate (Ford et al., 1984). The goal of our project is to make use of this natural nanoparticle as both a scaffold and a reporter system.

How can Ferritin be a Reporter?

Iron has naturally attracted attention for its ability to participate in Fenton chemistry. In this reaction iron acts as a catalyst in order to cause the disproportionation of hydrogen peroxide into oxygen-radical species (Figure 2). The resulting hydroxyl radical can cause the oxidation of common horseradish peroxidase substrates such as 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) and 3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) to produce a colourimetric output. The standard iron core of ferritin however is not very suitable for catalyzing this process. The catalytic activity of ferritin can be increased by synthesizing ferritin with a magnetite core. The synthesis of this ”magnetoferritin” however is time consuming and is prone to disruption due to oxidation.

An alternative to increasing the catalytic activity of ferritin would be to provide the necessary ferrous ions for the Fenton chemistry via the iron complex Prussian blue. This compound could act as a surface modification agent to give the ferritin core a Prussian blue surface. Prussian blue has previously displayed high catalytic activity and is believed to act as a source of negative charge at appropriate pH levels in order to yield an affinity with positively charged peroxidase substrates such as TMB (Zhang et al., 2010).

Synthesizing Prussian Blue Ferritin

The creation of Prussian blue ferritin is a relatively simple process that involves the surface modification of the iron core of normal ferritin. In order to accomplish this purified ferritin is combined with the compound potassium ferrocyanide under acidic conditions in order to produce the iron complex Prussian blue (Zhang et al., 2013). This chemical reaction can be seen below:

The chemical process can easily be observed as there is a visible colour change from the colour of ferritin to the blue colour of Prussian blue ferritin (Figure 4). This reaction takes place overnight and then the Prussian blue ferritin is collected via dialysis. For this process we made use of commercial horse spleen ferritin. Based on our research we do not anticipate that this will display altered properties from that of the human ferritin that we will be producing in our E. coli.

Kinetic Testing of Prussian Blue Ferritin

The next step in moving forward with Prussian blue ferritin as a potential reporter was to determine the kinetic characteristics of the catalyst. This is necessary in order to understand how our reporter will react over time in relation to different substrate concentrations. Based on previous data (Zhang et al., 2013) it had been seen that the catalytic activity can be fit to Michealis-Menten kinetic models allowing us an opportunity to evaluate the Prussian blue ferritin as a reporter. Our analysis composed of varying both the chromogenic substrate (TMB or ABTS) concentration and the hydrogen peroxide concentration.

Our kinetic analysis also included a comparison of Prussian blue horse spleen ferritin to regular horse spleen ferritin for both TMB and ABTS (Figures 5, 6). For both of these substrates we can see that normal ferritin has a very low catalytic activity. This is excellent news as it means that our Prussian blue modification is an effective modification to create a strong catalyst. It also means that the presence of unmodified ferritin is not active enough to pose a significant risk for producing spurious results in our system.

Optimization of Prussian Blue Ferritin Reaction Conditions

The next step of our process was to determine the optimal conditions in which our Prussian blue ferritin reporter could operate. This is a very important step in determining how we will move forward with creating a portable sensor device. The first variable tested was pH. For this variable we can see that the lower the pH the higher the activity of Prussian blue ferritin in the case of the ABTS substrate. As we raise the pH for this substrate we see that the activity drastically drops off. We did not test below a pH of 2 as the ferritin subunits would dissociate at this point. For the TMB substrate however we see that the activity has a much higher relative activity at a neutral pH compared to the ABTS substrate. This would be beneficial in our system as it means the substrate solution can be a lot friendlier to the other proteins present on the strip.

The next variable we tested was the effect of temperature on the Prussian blue ferritin. For both substrates we can see that the as the temperature increases. Armed with this information we know that if can increase the incubation temperature of our system when we add the substrate solution we can potentially decrease the amount of time it will take our system to produce a signal from the presence of our target DNA.

Does Prussian Blue Ferritin Work on a Strip?

After doing the kinetic analysis of our Prussian blue ferritin it was necessary to think in terms of our actual device. There are many factors that we must balance in order to design the most optimal system. How much Prussian blue ferritin will give us a positive result that we can see with the naked eye? Which substrate will give us a result the fastest? What substrate colour is the easiest to see (Figure 11)?

In order to test our Prussian blue ferritin in a strip environment we blotted varying concentrations of Prussian blue ferritin onto nitrocellulose; the material which will make up our strip system. From the results below it became readily obvious that TMB produced a much more distinct and identifiable colour compared to ABTS (Figures 12, 13). It was also able to detect the reaction of TMB when only 5 nanograms of Prussian blue ferritin was present. We anticipate that this detection limit could be improved given more refined methods of applying the protein to the nitrocellulose. We also decided based on the results of this experiment and previous experiments we have decided that TMB is the optimal substrate for our system. We could potentially explore more sensitive substrates to see if they interact with Prussian blue ferritin differently or are more sensitive with our system. We also tested Prussian blue ferritin in a basic prototype housing. You can see the results of this experiment on the Prototype page.

So can our Recombinant Ferritin become Prussian Blue Ferritin?

YES