Team:Calgary/Sandbox/Notebook/Journal/Reporter
From 2013.igem.org
(Week 1) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<h2>Week 1: May 1 - May 3</h2> | <h2>Week 1: May 1 - May 3</h2> | ||
- | <p> | + | <p>We examined three problems related to ferritin. Firstly, we investigated protein isolation of ferritin. We are considering the protocols created by Santambrogio et al. (1993), as they have been used by multiple other authors as well. This paper uses precipitation followed by column chromatography, and verification with spectroscopy, PAGE and SDS-PAGE (Levi 1994). Alternatively, we may consider using his-tags for Ni-NTA column purification. |
+ | Secondly, we examined the feasibility of using magnetism to manipulate ferritin. Commercial horse spleen ferritin was tested on a Dynabead rack, and as expected, it did not move, as the core should not be magnetic. We must thus synthesize magnetoferritin wherein the native ferrihydrite core is converted to magnetite--a paramagnetic material which can be attracted to magnetic fields (Jordan et al. 2010, Wong et al. 1998). We were able to attain some general knowledge of magnetism in nano-scale material, including a basic understanding of blocking temperatures, superparamagnetism and magnetic moments, all magnetism-related measurements. But we are ill-equipped to model this system theoretically in terms of calculated forces. We also explore the possibility of alternative magnetic particles, in the case ferritin is too small to exhibit magnetic forces significant enough to move proteins. Magnetosomes were found to be much larger, but unviable due to the complexity of their creation. The CCMV virus may also be an option, although there is currently little known about it and therefore further research into this topic is required. (Lohsse et al. 2011). | ||
+ | Because we also intend to scaffold proteins to ferritin as in our TALE DNA-binding proteins, we looked into fusions to both C- and N-terminals of ferritin. The N- and C- termini of ferritin subunits are present on the outside and inside of the nanoparticle respectively, and therefore N-terminal fusions are an obvious choice to ensure TALEs are present on the exterior of the nanoparticles (Dorner et al. 1985). | ||
+ | </p> | ||
<h2>Week 2: May 6 - May 10</h2> | <h2>Week 2: May 6 - May 10</h2> |
Revision as of 15:25, 30 August 2013
Ferritin Journal
Week 1: May 1 - May 3
We examined three problems related to ferritin. Firstly, we investigated protein isolation of ferritin. We are considering the protocols created by Santambrogio et al. (1993), as they have been used by multiple other authors as well. This paper uses precipitation followed by column chromatography, and verification with spectroscopy, PAGE and SDS-PAGE (Levi 1994). Alternatively, we may consider using his-tags for Ni-NTA column purification. Secondly, we examined the feasibility of using magnetism to manipulate ferritin. Commercial horse spleen ferritin was tested on a Dynabead rack, and as expected, it did not move, as the core should not be magnetic. We must thus synthesize magnetoferritin wherein the native ferrihydrite core is converted to magnetite--a paramagnetic material which can be attracted to magnetic fields (Jordan et al. 2010, Wong et al. 1998). We were able to attain some general knowledge of magnetism in nano-scale material, including a basic understanding of blocking temperatures, superparamagnetism and magnetic moments, all magnetism-related measurements. But we are ill-equipped to model this system theoretically in terms of calculated forces. We also explore the possibility of alternative magnetic particles, in the case ferritin is too small to exhibit magnetic forces significant enough to move proteins. Magnetosomes were found to be much larger, but unviable due to the complexity of their creation. The CCMV virus may also be an option, although there is currently little known about it and therefore further research into this topic is required. (Lohsse et al. 2011). Because we also intend to scaffold proteins to ferritin as in our TALE DNA-binding proteins, we looked into fusions to both C- and N-terminals of ferritin. The N- and C- termini of ferritin subunits are present on the outside and inside of the nanoparticle respectively, and therefore N-terminal fusions are an obvious choice to ensure TALEs are present on the exterior of the nanoparticles (Dorner et al. 1985).
Week 2: May 6 - May 10
Enter Text Here
Week 3: May 13 - May 17
Enter Text Here
Week 4: May 20 - May 24
Enter Text Here
Week 5: May 27 - May 31
Enter Text Here
Week 6: June 3 - June 7
Enter Text Here
Week 7: June 10 - June 14
Enter Text Here
Week 8: June 17 - June 21
Enter Text Here
Week 9: June 24 - June 28
Enter Text Here
Week 10: July 1 - July 5
Enter Text Here
Week 11: July 8 - July 12
Enter Text Here
Week 12: July 15 - July 19
Enter Text Here
Week 13: July 22 - July 26
Enter Text Here
Week 14: July 29 - August 2
Enter Text Here
Week 15: August 5 - August 9
Enter Text Here
Week 16: August 12 - August 16
Enter Text Here
Week 17: August 19 - August 23
Enter Text Here
Week 18: August 26 - August 30
Enter Text Here
Week 19: September 2 - September 6
Enter Text Here
Week 20: September 9 - September 13
Enter Text Here
Week 21: September 16 - September 20
Enter Text Here
Week 22: September 23 - September 27
Enter Text Here
Week 23: September 30 - October 4
Enter Text Here