Biosafety System AraCtive

Overview

Biosafety-System AraCtive.

The Biosafety-System araCtive <bbpart>BBa_K1172909</bbpart> is an improvement of the Biobrick <bbpart>BBa_K914014</bbpart> by changing the first promoter into the rhamnose promoter P_Rha, integration of the alanine racemase <bbpart>BBa_K1172901</bbpart> and usage of the repressor AraC to regulate the transcription of the Barnase behind the P_BAD promoter. Because of the tight repression of this promoter, this system has the lowest basal transcription of the Barnase and is therefore the most active and attractive one.

Genetic Approach

Rhamnose promoter P_Rha

The promoter P_Rha (<bbpart>BBa_K914003</bbpart>) naturally regulates the catabolism of the hexose L-rhamnose. The advantage of the operon for further usage is its solely positive regulation. The regulon consists of the promoter P_RhaT, which regulates the expression of the protein RhaT for the uptake of L-rhamnose and the two operons rhaSR and rhaBAD.
The operon rhaSR rencodes the two transcriptional activators RhaS and RhaR, who are responsible for the positive activation of the L-rhamnose catabolism, while the operon rhaBAD encodes the genes for the direct catabolism of L-rhamnose.
When L-rhamnose is present, it acts as an inducer by binding to the regulatory protein RhaR. RhaR regulates his own expression and the expression of the regulatory gene rhaS by repressing or, in the presence of L-rhamnose, activating the operon rhaSR. Normally, the expression level is modest, but it can be enhanced by a higher level of intracellular cAMP, which increases in the absence of glucose. So, in the presence of L-rhamnose and a high concentration of intracellular cAMP, the activator protein RhaR is expressed on higher level, resulting in an activation of the promoter P_rhaT for an efficient L-rhamnose uptake and an activation of the operon rhaBAD. The L-rhamnose is than broken down into dihydroxyacetone phosphate and lactate aldehyde by the enzymes encoded by rhaBAD (Wickstrum et al., 2005).
A brief schematic summary of the regulation is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: The catabolism of L-rhamnose in E. coli is turned off in general but inducible by L-rhamnose. The induction activates the transcription of the genes rhaS and rhaR, which regulate the L-rhamnose catabolsim by positive activation of the rhamnose uptake (rhaT) and its metabolization (rhaBAD).

Dihydroxyacetone phosphate can be metabolized in the glycolysis pathway, while lactate aldehyde is oxidized to lactate under aerobic conditions and reduced to L-1,2,-propandiol under anaerobic conditions.
This degradation of L-rhamnose can be separated in three steps. In the first step the L-rhamnose is turned into L-rhamnulose by an isomerase (gene rhaA). L-rhamnulose is in turn phosphorylated to L-rhamnulose-1-phosphate by a kinase (gene rhaB) and the sugar phosphate is finally hydrolyzed by an aldolase (gene rhaD) to dihydroxyacetone phosphate and lactate aldehyde (Baldoma et al., 1988).
For our Safety-System the rhamnose promoter P_Rha is used to control the expression of the repressor AraC and the essential alanine racemase, because this promoter has an even lower basal transcription then the arabinose promoter P_BAD. This is needed to tightly repress the expression of the alanine racemase (alr) and thereby take advantage of the double-kill switch. Although the rhamnose promoter P_Rha is characterized by a very low basal transcription it can not be used for the control of the toxic RNase Ba (Barnase), which ist needed for the alanine racemase (alr), the other part of the double-kill switch. In conclusion this promoter is the best choice for the first part of the Biosafety-System, as it is tightly repressed in the absence of L-rhamnose, but activated in its presence.

Repressor AraC

The araC gene is naturally found in E. coli and is coding for the 32 kDa AraC protein, which regulates the expression of the genes required for the uptake and catabolism of the pentose L-arabinose. The genes for the catabolism of arabinose are under the control of the arabinose promoter P_BAD, which is both positively and negatively regulated by the repressor AraC. Naturally in the presence of L-arabinose the expression of those genes is activated, while it is repressed in its absence. In addition the AraC protein regulates its own transcription under the control of the so called P_C promoter. Compared to the P_BAD promoter the P_C promoter and the associated araC gene are therefore transcribed in opposite direction (Schleif, 2010).

Figure 2: Positive regulation of the arabinose promoter P_BAD. When L-arabinose is present the dimer-structure of AraC is relaxed and the AraC protein functions as activator. The activation can additionally be enhanced by the CRP-cAMP-complex.

Figure 3: Negative regulation of the arabinose promoter P_BAD. In the absence of L-arabinose AraC functions as repressor by forming a dimer, which inhibits the binding of the RNA-polymerase.

Naturally in the absence of L-arabinose the AraC protein is found in its repressor conformation, binding to the O₂-region and I₁-region. Binding two AraC proteins to this domains is leading to a protein-protein-interaction of AraC forming a dimer. This AraC is responsible for the tight repression of the P_C and the P_BAD promoter by forming a DNA-loop to inhibit the initiation of the RNA-polymerase (see Figure 3 above).
When L-arabinose is present in the media the operon changes to the active form. Following this conditions the araC protein functions as activator by binding to the I₁- and I₂-region of the operator region. This causes transcription of the genes behind the P_BAD and the P_C promoter. Depending on the intracellular level of cAMP the transcription of both the genes behind the promoters P_BAD and P_C can even be enhanced. In the absence of glucose the cell reaches a high level of cAMP as a signal molecule. CAMP binds as the typically CRP-cAMP complex binds in front of the AraC activator and increases the binding affinity of the RNA-polymerase, so that the genes behind the P_BAD promoter are expressed on higher levels. Beside the transcription affinity of the P_BAD promoter the AraC protein also regulates the genes araE and the operon consisting the genes araFGH, which are necessary for an efficient uptake of L-arabinose (Cass, 1988).
The auto-regulation of the araC gene itself works both in the presence and absence of L-arabinose. In presence of L-arabinose the DNA-loop which prevents also the transcription of the P_BAD promoter also inhibits the transcription of araC. When L-arabinose is present and the AraC concentration is high enough, its auto-regulates its own transcription by dimerization between the araO₁- and the araO₂-region. This leads to an other DNA-loop, inhibiting solely the transcription of the genes behind the P_C promoter (Hamilton, 1988).
For our Biosafety-System we decided to use the arabinose P_BAD promoter, because this promoter is really tight regulated by AraC, and shows no basal transcription in the complete absence of AraC. Additional this promoter is repressed by glucose and basal transcription is activated in the presence of cAMP.

Alanine racemase Alr

The alanine racemase Alr (EC 5.1.1.1) from the gram-negative enteric bacteria Escherichia coli is a racemase, which catalyses the reversible conversion of L-alanine into the enantiomer D-alanine (see Figure 4). For this reaction the cofactor pyridoxal-5'-phosphate (PLP) is typically needed. The constitutive expressed alanine racemase (alr) is naturally responsible for the accumulation of D-alanine, which is an essential component of the bacterial cell wall, because it is used for the crosslinkage of peptidoglykan (Walsh, 1989).
The usage of D-alanine instead of a typically L-amino acids prevents cleavage by peptidases. However a lack of D-alanine causes to a bacteriolytic characteristics. In the absence of D‑alanine dividing cells will lyse rapidly. This perception is used for our Biosafety-Strain, a D-alanine auxotrophic mutant (K-12 ∆alr ∆dadX). The Biosafety-Strain grows only with a plasmid containing the alanine racemase (<bbpart>BBa_K1172901</bbpart>) with a complementation of the D-alanine auxotrophy. Consequently the alanine racemase is essential for bacterial cell division. This approach guarantees a high plasmid stability, which is extremely important when the plasmid contains a toxic gene like the Barnase. In addition this construction provides the possibility for the implementation of a double kill-switch system. Because if the expression of the alanine racemase is repressed and there is no D-alanine-Supplementation in the media, cells will not grow.

Figure 4: The alanine racemase (<bbpart>BBa_K1172901</bbpart>) from E. coli catalyses the reversible conversion from L-alanine to D-alanine. For this isomerisation the cofactor pyridoxal-5'-phosphate is necessary.

Terminator

Terminators are essential for the end of an operon. In procaryots two types of terminators exist. The rho-depending and the rho-independing terminator. Rho-independing terminators are characterized by their stem-loop forming sequence. In general the terminator-region can be divided into four regions. Starting with a GC-rich region, which performs the stem and is followed by the loop-region. The third region is made up from the opposite part of the stem, so that this region concerns also a high GC-content. The terminator region closes with a poly uracil region, which destabilizes the binding of the RNA-polymerase. The stem-loop of the terminator causes a distinction of the DNA and the translated RNA. Consequently the binding of the RNA-polymerase is cancelled and the transcription ends after the stem-loop (Carafa et al., 1990).
For our Bioafety-System araCtive the terminator is necessary to avoid that the expression of the genes under control of the Rhamnose promoter P_Rha, like the Repressor AraC and the Alanine-Racemase (alr) results in the transcription of the genes behind the Arabinose promoter P_BAD, which contains the toxic Barnase <bbpart>BBa_K1172904</bbpart> and would lead to cell death.

Figure 5: Stem-loop structure of the terminator <bbpart>BBa_B0015</bbpart>, which is used for the Biosafety-System araCtive. The terminator is used to make sure that solely both the repressor AraC and the alanine racemase Alr are expressed but the transcription of the toxic RNase Ba (Barnase) is avoided.

Arabinose promoter P_BAD

The arabinose promoter P_BAD controls the expression of the genes, which are necessary for the catabolism of the pentose arabinose. The expression is regulated by the activator and repressor AraC. The genes of this operon convert the pentose to xylose, which can be catalyzed into fructose-1,6-diphosphate and subsequently becomes so part of the glycolysis. The conversion of L-arabinose is realized in three steps. First the isomerase (gene A) catalyses the reaction from L-arabinose into the isomer L-ribulose. In the second step the Ribulose-kinase (gene B) phosphorylates the L-ribulose to L-ribulose-monophosphat. For this reaction ATP is needed. At least the L-ribulose-monophosphate is converted to D-Xylose-5-phosphat by the L-ribulose-5-phosphate-epimerase (gene D, Schleif, 2010).

Figure 6: Overview of the arabinose regulon from E. coli. The transcription of the genes araBAD, which are coding for the enzymes of the L-arabinose catabolism are positivly upregulated and negativly inhibited by the AraC protein, which additionally autoregulates his own transcription.

For our Safety-System we used the arabinose promoter P_BAD for the regulation of the toxic gene product Barnase. As this promoter has very low basal transcription and as the expression of the genes behind this promoter is strict depending on the presence of AraC for activating the transcription, it is possible to use the arabinose promoter P_BAD to control the expression of a toxic gene product without causing cell death.

RNase Ba (Barnase)

The Barnase (EC 3.1.27) is a 12 kDa extracellular microbial ribonuclease, which is naturally found in the gram-positive soil bacteria Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and consists of a single chain of 110 amino acids. The Barnase (RNase Ba) catalyses the cleavage of single stranded RNA, whereat the hydrolysis of the dinucleotides has the highest affinity to the structure GpN. In the first step of the RNA-degradation a cyclic intermediate is formed by transesterification and afterwards this intermediate is hydrolysed yielding in a 3'-nucleotide (Mossakowska et al., 1989).

Figure 7: Enzymatic reaction of the RNA-cleavage by the RNase Ba. First the transesterifiaction by the Glu-73 residue is performed and then this cyclic intermediat is hydrolized by the His-102 of the Barnase.

In Bacillus amyloliquefaciens the activity ot the Barnase (RNase Ba) is inhibited intracellular by the Inhibitor called barstar. Barstar consists of only 89 amino acids and binds with a high affinity to the toxic Barnase. This prevents the cleavage of the intracellular RNA in the host organism (Paddon et al., 1989). Therefore the Barnase naturally acts only outside the cell and is translocated under natural conditions. For the Biosafety-System araCtive we modified this aspect by cloning only the sequence responsible for the cleavage of the RNA, but not the signal sequence of the native Barnase, which is essential for the extracellular transport.
As shown in Figure 8 below, the transcription of the DNA, which encodes the Barnase produces a 474 nt RNA. The translation of the RNA starts about 25 nucleotides downstream from the transcription start and can be divided into two parts. The first part (colored in orange) is translated into a signal peptide at the amino-terminus of the Barnase coding RNA. This part is responsible for the extracellular translocation of the RNase Ba, while the peptide sequence for the active Barnase starts 142 nucleotides downstream from the transcription start (colored in red).
For the Biosafety-System araCtive we only used the coding sequence (<bbpart>BBa_K1172904</bbpart>) of the Barnase to prevent the extracellular translocation of the toxic gene product. Translation of the barnase gene leads to a rapid cell death if the expression of the Barnase isn't repressed by the repressor AraC of our Biosafety-System.

Figure 8: Sequence of the signal peptide amino terminal of the RNase Ba (Barnase). The Biobrick <bbpart>BBa_K1172904</bbpart> does not include the signal sequence for the extracellular translocation, but only the coding sequence for the mature enzyme.

Biosafety-System araCtive

Combining the gene described above with the Biosafety-Strain K-12 ∆alr ∆dadX results in a powerful device, allowing us to control the bacterial cell division. The control of the bacterial growth is possible either active or passive. Active by inducing the P_BAD promoter with L-arabinose and passive by the induction of L-rhamnose. The passive control makes it possible to control the bacterial cell division in a defined closed environment, like the MFC, by continously adding L-rhamnose to the medium. As shown in the figure below, this leads to an expression of the essential Alanine-Racemase (alr) and the araC repressor, so that the expression of the RNase Ba is repressed.

Figure 9: Biosafety-System araCtive in the presence of L-rhamnose. The essential alanine racemase (Alr) and the repressor AraC are expressed, resulting in a repression of the expression of the RNAse Ba. Consequently the bacteria show normal growth behaviour.

In the event that bacteria exit the defined environment of the MFC or L-rhamnose is not added to the medium any more, both the expression of the alanine Racemase (Alr) and the AraC repressor decrease, so that the expression of the toxic RNase Ba (Barnase) is not inhibited as strongly as before. The cleavage of the intracellular RNA by the Barnase and the lack of synthesized D-alanine, caused by the repressed alanine racemase inhibit the cell division and makes sure that the bacteria can only grow in the defined area.

Figure 10: Active Biosafety-System araCtive outside of a defined enviroment and decreased concentrations of L-rhamnose. Both the expression of the alanine racemase (Alr) and AraC repressor are reduced and ideally completely shutdown. In contrast the expression of the RNase ba (Barnase) is sligthly turned on, leading to cell death by RNA cleavage.

Results

Characterization of the arabinose promoter P_BAD

First of all the arabinose promoter P_BAD was characterized to get a first impression of its basal transcription rate. Therefore the bacterial growth was investigated under the pressure of the unrepressed P_BAD promoter on different carbon source using M9 minimal medium with either glucose or glycerol. The transcription rate was identified by fluorescence measurement of GFP <bbpart>BBa_E0040</bbpart> from behind the P_BAD promoter using the BioBrick <bbpart>BBa_I13541</bbpart>.
As shown in Figure 12 below, the bacteria adapted better on glucose then on glycerol. This is caused by the fact, that glucose is the more powerful energy source of this two, because it posses more carbon atoms in comparison to glycerol. For the investigation of the basal transcription the fluorescence measurement, shown in Figure 13, is more interesting.
It can be seen that both the wild type E. coli K-12 and the Biosafety-Strain E. coli K-12 ∆alr ∆dadX ∆araC show about the same fluorescence on glucose (blue and black curve) but differ on glycerin. This can be explained by the fact that glucose itself represses the arabinose promoter P_BAD, while glycerol does not. In the presence of glucose the intracellular concentration of cAMP is low to repress the inefficient catabolism of arabinose, so that the glucose is catabolized first by the bacteria resulting in an optimal growth. In the absence of glucose intracellular cAMP increases, which enhances the transcription of the most operons for alternative catabolic pathways. This causes, that the expression of GFP under the control of the P_BAD promoter decreases on glycerol. Another different can be seen between the wild type (orange curve) and the Biosafety-Strain K-12 ∆alr ∆dadX ∆araC (red curve). The Biosafety-Strain shows lower expression then the wild type, but has about the same growth rate, according to Figure 11. The reason for this characteristic is caused by the deleted AraC protein in the Biosafety-Strain. Because the AraC protein functions not only as are repressor but also as an activator the transcription rate decreases in the Biosafety-Strain.

Figure 11: Characterization of the bacterial growth of the Biosafety-Strain K-12 ∆alr ∆dadX ∆araC containing the plasmid <bbpart>BBa_I13541</bbpart> with GFP (<bbpart>BBa_E0040</bbpart>) under the control of the P_BAD promoter. The M9 medium was supplemented with 5 mM D-alanine. It could be demonstrated, that the bacteria grow faster on M9 minimal medium glucose than on M9 minimal medium glycerol.

Figure 12: Characterization of the fluorescence of the Biosafety-Strain K-12 ∆alr ∆dadX ∆araC containing the plasmid <bbpart>BBa_I13541</bbpart> with GFP (<bbpart>BBa_E0040</bbpart>) under control of the P_BAD promoter. The Biosafety-Strain was cultivated on M9 minimal medium with 5 mM D-alanine supplemented.

The effect that glucose represses the transcription of the P_BAD promoter becomes more clear by analysis of the specific production rate, as shown in Figure 13. The specific production rate was thereby calculated via equation (1) :

With the specific production rate of GFP it can be demonstrated that the building of GFP differs extremely between the cultivation on glucose and glycerol. The specific production rate is constantly very low, when using glucose as carbon source, but shows a constant higher level in the cultivation with glycerol.
Because the specific production rate was calculated between every single measurement point, the curve in Figure 13 is not smoothed and so the fluctuations have to be ignored, as they do not stand for are real fluctuations in the transcription or expression of GFP. They are caused by the growth curve and the fluorescence curve. And as neither of this curves are ideal, the fluctuations are caused. Nevertheless this graph shows clearly the difference between the two carbon sources.

Figure 13: Specific growth rate of GFP behind the P_BAD promoter by the use of different carbon sources.

Characterization of the Biosafety-System araCtive

The Biosafety-System araCtive was characterized on M9 minimal medium using glycerol as carbon source. As for the characterization of the pure arabinose promoter P_BAD above, the bacterial growth and the fluorescence of GFP <bbpart>BBa_E0040</bbpart> was measured. Therefore the wild type and the Biosafety-Strain E. coli K-12 ∆alr ∆dadX containing the Biosafety-Plasmid <bbpart>BBa_K1172909</bbpart> were cultivated once with the induction of 1% L-Rhamnose and once only on glycerol.
As shown in Figure 14, it is obviously that the bacteria, who were induced with 1 % L-rhamnose (blue and black curve) grow significant slower than on pure glycerol (orange and red curve). This is attributed to the high metabolic pressure of the induced bacteria. The expression of the repressor AraC and the alanine racemase (Alr) simultaneously causes a high outlay of the cells, so that they grow slower then the uninduced cells, who expresses only GFP. Additional the arabinose promoter P_BAD is tightly regulated, so that the expression even with a small amount of the repressor AraC is not that high and therefore not as stressful.
Comparing the bacterial growth with the fluorescence in Figure 15, it can be seen that the fluorescence seems to follow the same trend than the bacterial growth. The uninduced cells shows approximately an exponential rise of fluorescence, while in comparision the fluorescence of the induced bacteria increases only slowly.

Figure 14: Characterization of the bacterial growth of the Biosafety-System on M9 minimal medium glycerol. The Figure compares the wild type K-12 and the Biosafety-Strain K-12 ∆alr ∆dadX containing the Biosaftey-Plasmid <bbpart>BBa_K1172909</bbpart> and the induction by 1% L-rhamnose to pure glycerol.

Figure 15: Characterization of the fluorescence of the Biosafety-System araCtive. The Figure compares the wild type K-12 and the Biosafety-Strain K-12 ∆alr ∆dadX containing the Biosafety-Plasmid <bbpart>BBa_K1172909</bbpart> and the induction by 1% L-rhamnose to pure glycerol.

From the Figure 15 above it can not be clearly seen if the expression of the repressor AraC does effect the transcription of GFP or not. The slower growth of the bacteria is a first indication that the repressor AraC and the alanine racemase (Alr) are highly expressed, but the growth of the bacteria shows nearly the same trend as the fluorescence. So it could be possible that the repressor does not effect the expression level of GFP under the control of the arabinose promoter P_BAD. This becomes more clear by the calculation of the specific production rate of GFP by equation (1) . As shown in Figure 17 below the specific production rate differs clearly between the uninduced Biosafety-System and the Biosafety-System induced by 1% L-rhamnose. The production of GFP in the presence of L-rhamnose (red curve) is always lower than in its absence (orange curve), so that the expression of GFP is repressed in the presence of L-rhamnose.
Because the specific production rate of GFP was calculated between every single measurement point, the curve in Figure 16 is not smoothed and so the fluctuations have to be ignored, as they do not stand for are real fluctuations in the transcription or expression of GFP. They are caused by the growth curve and the fluorescence curve. And as neither of this measured curves are ideal, the fluctuations are the result. Nevertheless it can be demonstrated, that the production of GFP is reduced significantly in the presence of L-rhamnose and AraC respectively. So the Biosafety-System araCtive works.

Figure 16: Specific production rate of GFP for the Biosafety-System araCtive, calculated from equation (1). The production rate of GFP of the uninduced bacteria is significant higher compared to the bacteria induced with 1% L-rhamnose. The Biosafety-System AraCtive works.

Conclusion of the Results

The expression level of GFP is increased in the absence of L-rhamnose and decreased in its presence. In Figure 17 the specific production rates of GFP after 7,5 hours are compared within the Biosafety-System araCtive. On one hand it can be seen that the expression level of GFP behind the P_BAD promoter decreases in the uninduced Safety-Strain (orange bar) compared to the uninduced second part of the Biosafety-System <bbpart>BBa_I13541</bbpart> (purple bar). This is caused by the basal transcription of the first part of the Biosafety-System containing the AraC repressor, who causes a tighter repression of the P_BAD promoter, while there are no sufficient amounts of AraC by the characterization of the second part only.
On the other hand Figure 17 demonstrates, that the induction of the Biosafety-System with L-rhamnose leads to a tight repression of the expression of GFP (red bar). Therefore the second part of the Biosafety-System, which contains normally the toxic RNase Ba <bbpart>BBa_K1172904</bbpart> can be used as a kill-switch regulated bythe pentose L-rhamnose.

Figure 17: Comparision of the specific production rate of GFP. Shown are the induced (1% L-rhamnose) Biosafety-System araCtive, the uninduced Biosafety-System araCtive and the second part of the Biosafety-System (P_BAD - GFP only).

In comparison to the other Biosafety-Systems it becomes clear, that the Biosafety-System araCtive would be probably the best choice of our three Biosafety-Systems, because of its tight repression by the P_BAD promoter of the second part. And although the Biosafety-System works there are still some optimization remaining.
First the advantage of the double-kill switch system could be optimized by a tighter repression of the alanine racemase. This was tried by cultivation in M9 minimal medium with glucose to obtain a tighter repression of the L-rhamnose promoter P_Rha. In this cultivation a tighter repression of both parts of the Biosafety-System was observed, but did not significantly improve the double-kill switch mechanism. This might be caused by the fact, that the preculture was supplemented with L-rhamnose and D-alanine. Although the cells were washed several times before cultivation, it is possible that the bacteria store D-alanine and L-rhamnose for some time, as observed for D-alanine in the D-alanine-auxotrophic strain. Additional also the alanine racemase (Alr) could accumulate because of the induction. This could be reason for the survival of the Biosafety-Strain in the absence of L-rhamnose.
Furthermore glucose does not occur in this amounts in nature, so that the repression of the rhamnose promoter P_Rha should be ensured by alternative carbon sources and a corresponding higher intracellular cAMP concentration and not by glucose. So another improvement of the Biosafety-System could be to adjust the plasmid copy number. The plasmid pSB1C3 we used for the Biosafety-System araCtive <bbpart>BBa_K1172909</bbpart> is a high copy plasmid, resulting in 100 – 300 copies of the plasmid in each cell. Therefore it could be worthwhile to clone the Biosafety-System into a medium (15 – 20 copies) or even a low copy plasmid (2 – 12 copies) to take advantage of the double-kill switch on one hand, and to reduce the metabolic pressure triggered by the plasmid on the other hand. Moreover the lower plasmid copy number might simplify the integration of the Barnase instead of GFP. Nevertheless the Biosafety-System araCtive we constructed can already be used as a single kill-switch Biosafety-System and is characterized by a higher plasmid stability compared to common Biosafety-Systems.

References

• Baldoma L and Aguilar J (1988) Metabolism of L-Fucose and L-Rhamnose in Escherichia coli: Aerobic-Anaerobic Regulation of L-Lactaldehyde Dissimilation [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC210658/pdf/jbacter00179-0434.pdf|Journal of Bacteriology 170: 416 - 421.].
• Carafa, Yves d'Aubenton Brody, Edward and Claude (1990) Thermest Prediction of Rho-independent Escherichia coli Transcription Terminators - A Statistical Analysis of their RNA Stem-Loop Structures [http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0022283699800059/1-s2.0-S0022283699800059-main.pdf?_tid=ede07e2a-2a92-11e3-b889-00000aab0f6c&acdnat=1380629809_2d1a59e395fc69c8608ab8b5aea842f7|Journal of molecular biology 216: 835 - 858].
• Cass, Laura G. and Wilcoy, Gary (1988) Novel Activation of araC Expression and a DNA Site Required for araC Autoregulation in Escherichia coli B/r [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC211425/pdf/jbacter00187-0394.pdf|Journal of Bacteriology 170: 4174 - 4180].
• Hamilton, Eileen P. and Lee, Nancy (1988) Three binding sites for AraC protein are required for autoregulation of araC in Escherichia coli [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC279856/pdf/pnas00258-0029.pdf|Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85: 1749 - 53].
• Mossakowska, Danuta E. Nyberg, Kerstin and Fersht, Alan R. (1989) Kinetic Characterization of the Recombinant Ribonuclease from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (Barnase) and Investigation of Key Residues in Catalysis by Site-Directed Mutagenesis [http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/bi00435a033|Biochemistry 28: 3843 - 3850.].
• Paddon, C. J. Vasantha, N. and Hartley, R. W. (1989) Translation and Processing of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Extracellular Rnase [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC209718/pdf/jbacter00168-0575.pdf|Journal of Bacteriology 171: 1185 - 1187.].
• Schleif, Robert (2010) AraC protein, regulation of the L-arabinose operon in Escherichia coli, and the light switch mechanism of AraC action [http://gene.bio.jhu.edu/Ourspdf/127.pdf|FEMS microbial reviews 34: 779 - 796.].
• Voss, Carsten Lindau, Dennis and Flaschel, Erwin (2006) Production of Recombinant RNase Ba and Its Application in Downstream Processing of Plasmid DNA for Pharmaceutical Use [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1021/bp050417e/pdf|Biotechnology Progress 22: 737 - 744.].
• Walsh, Christopher (1989) Enzymes in the D-alanine branch of bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan assembly. [http://www.jbc.org/content/264/5/2393.long|Journal of biological chemistry 264: 2393 - 2396.]
• Wickstrum, J.R., Santangelo, T.J., and Egan, S.M. (2005) Cyclic AMP receptor protein and RhaR synergistically activate transcription from the L-rhamnose-responsive rhaSR promoter in Escherichia coli. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1251584/?report=reader|Journal of Bacteriology 187: 6708 – 6719.].
• Casali, N., Preston A. (2003) E. coli Plasmid Vectors - Methods and Applications [http://www.springerprotocols.com/BookToc/doi/10.1385/1592594093 |Methods in Molecular Biology 235].