Team:Calgary/Project/OurSensor/Reporter

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 10: Line 10:
<p>For our project we needed a reporter system. After careful consideration, we set upon an <span class="Yellow"><b>enzyme/catalyst reporter</b></span> as our preliminary modelling of green fluorescent protein (GFP) output indicated it would not provide a strong enough signal for a portable device. GFP would provide a constant signal that would not increase in intensity over time. The fluorescent output of GFP would also require the device to have the ability to excite the protein with the appropriate wavelength of light. This would add to both the complexity and cost of the device, making it harder to offer a portable and cheap solution.</p>
<p>For our project we needed a reporter system. After careful consideration, we set upon an <span class="Yellow"><b>enzyme/catalyst reporter</b></span> as our preliminary modelling of green fluorescent protein (GFP) output indicated it would not provide a strong enough signal for a portable device. GFP would provide a constant signal that would not increase in intensity over time. The fluorescent output of GFP would also require the device to have the ability to excite the protein with the appropriate wavelength of light. This would add to both the complexity and cost of the device, making it harder to offer a portable and cheap solution.</p>
-
<p>We decided that an enzyme with a colour output would be more suitable and easier to implement in the field. Many common enzymes were analyzed for this purpose, however from the conversations we had with industry we realized we would need a fast reporter for it to fit into their existing infrastructure. With this realization in mind we searched for a reporter ensitive, but rapid as well. One example is <span class="Yellow"><b>horseradish peroxidase.</span></b> This enzyme has high enzymatic activity and is commonly used in many biological applications. One problem with its use however is that it cannot be effectively produced within <i>E. coli</i>. There are other common enzymes that do not have this issue such as alkaline phosphatase. These enzymes however are often multimeric which presents an issue with our <i>in vitro</i> strip system.  If the enzymes are not able to assemble correctly with the rest of our proteins, the device will be ineffective. We also modelled the activities of some of these common reporters based on literature review in order to aid in informing us of the appropriate reporter for our system. Upon further investigation, we found <span class="Yellow"><b>two candidates</span></b></class>: the ampicillin resistance enzyme <span class="Yellow"><b>beta-lactamase</span></b> and <span class="Yellow"><b>ferritin</span></b>, a protein which can be chemically modified to become a strong catalyst. Why two different reporters? Characterizing two reporter systems, both of which have their own key advantages, gives us <span class="Yellow"><b>flexibility</span></b> in our platform technology to meet the different criteria that <i> will </i> exist for different detection systems. In addition, during our characterization, if one reporter does not act as it is meant to, we have the ability to focus on the other reporter for our system. Click the links below to learn more about these two systems:</p>
+
<p>We decided that an enzyme with a colour output would be more suitable and easier to implement in the field. Many common enzymes were analyzed for this purpose, however from the conversations we had with industry we realized we would need a fast reporter for it to fit into their existing infrastructure. With this realization in mind we searched for a reporter ensitive, but rapid as well. One example is <span class="Yellow"><b>horseradish peroxidase.</span></b> This enzyme has high enzymatic activity and is commonly used in many biological applications. One problem with its use however is that it cannot be effectively produced within <i>E. coli</i>. There are other common enzymes that do not have this issue such as alkaline phosphatase. These enzymes however are often multimeric which presents an issue with our <i>in vitro</i> strip system.  If the enzymes are not able to assemble correctly with the rest of our proteins, the device will be ineffective. We also modelled the activities of some of these common reporters based on literature review in order to aid in informing us of the appropriate reporter for our system. Upon further investigation, we found <span class="Yellow"><b>two candidates</span></b></class>: the ampicillin resistance enzyme <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Project/OurSensor/Reporter/BetaLactamase">beta-lactamase</a> and <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Project/OurSensor/Reporter/PrussianBlueFerritin">ferritin</a>, a protein which can be chemically modified to become a strong catalyst. Why two different reporters? Characterizing two reporter systems, both of which have their own key advantages, gives us <span class="Yellow"><b>flexibility</span></b> in our platform technology to meet the different criteria that <i> will </i> exist for different detection systems. In addition, during our characterization, if one reporter does not act as it is meant to, we have the ability to focus on the other reporter for our system. Click the links below to learn more about these two systems:</p>
<section id="ButtonsSection">
<section id="ButtonsSection">

Revision as of 01:43, 29 October 2013

Reporter

For our project we needed a reporter system. After careful consideration, we set upon an enzyme/catalyst reporter as our preliminary modelling of green fluorescent protein (GFP) output indicated it would not provide a strong enough signal for a portable device. GFP would provide a constant signal that would not increase in intensity over time. The fluorescent output of GFP would also require the device to have the ability to excite the protein with the appropriate wavelength of light. This would add to both the complexity and cost of the device, making it harder to offer a portable and cheap solution.

We decided that an enzyme with a colour output would be more suitable and easier to implement in the field. Many common enzymes were analyzed for this purpose, however from the conversations we had with industry we realized we would need a fast reporter for it to fit into their existing infrastructure. With this realization in mind we searched for a reporter ensitive, but rapid as well. One example is horseradish peroxidase. This enzyme has high enzymatic activity and is commonly used in many biological applications. One problem with its use however is that it cannot be effectively produced within E. coli. There are other common enzymes that do not have this issue such as alkaline phosphatase. These enzymes however are often multimeric which presents an issue with our in vitro strip system. If the enzymes are not able to assemble correctly with the rest of our proteins, the device will be ineffective. We also modelled the activities of some of these common reporters based on literature review in order to aid in informing us of the appropriate reporter for our system. Upon further investigation, we found two candidates: the ampicillin resistance enzyme beta-lactamase and ferritin, a protein which can be chemically modified to become a strong catalyst. Why two different reporters? Characterizing two reporter systems, both of which have their own key advantages, gives us flexibility in our platform technology to meet the different criteria that will exist for different detection systems. In addition, during our characterization, if one reporter does not act as it is meant to, we have the ability to focus on the other reporter for our system. Click the links below to learn more about these two systems: