Team:Marburg/Notebook:October
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 258: | Line 258: | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
<p>To demonstrate the production of antibodies in the induced cultures 2.1 and 4.2 a Western Blot should be performed. For this purpose, the cells were harvested and the pellet was separated from the supernatant. After that, a TCA precipitation was performed. All samples were stored at -20°C.</p> | <p>To demonstrate the production of antibodies in the induced cultures 2.1 and 4.2 a Western Blot should be performed. For this purpose, the cells were harvested and the pellet was separated from the supernatant. After that, a TCA precipitation was performed. All samples were stored at -20°C.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="notebooky-entry"> | ||
+ | <h2 class="title"> | ||
+ | <a name="22-10-2013">22.10.2013</a> | ||
+ | </h2> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- Cell disruption --> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="experiment sonification"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="soni">Cell disruption by means of sonication</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="investigator"> | ||
+ | <span class="inv">Investigator:</span> | ||
+ | <span class="inv-names">Franzi</span> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <span class="aim">Aim:</span> | ||
+ | <span class="aim-desc">Find the best buffer for sonication disruption method. | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>To examine whether the PBS buffer or the IP buffer is best for disruption by means of sonication, we performed a sonication with both buffers. Afterwards a TCA precipitation was made and a SDS-PAGE was carried out.</p> | ||
+ | <p>Result: We gained higher amounts of protein by using the IP buffer. Consequently, all following cell disruptions by sonication were performed with IP buffer.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> |
Revision as of 11:05, 28 October 2013