Team:Heidelberg/Outreach

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 98: Line 98:
             <div id="memberdesc" class="panel panel-default" style="text-align:justify; margin-top:30%; max-width:100%; max-height:100%;">
             <div id="memberdesc" class="panel panel-default" style="text-align:justify; margin-top:30%; max-width:100%; max-height:100%;">
                 <div class="panel-heading"><h3></h3></div>
                 <div class="panel-heading"><h3></h3></div>
-
                 <div class="panel-body">As our project is designed to provide knowledge to a broader spectrum of people, we believe that it is of very high priority to inform the public about our project and to receive feedback and personal perceptions from the society. Hence, we build our concept for the interaction with the public upon four pillars: First, interaction and cooperation with experts from multiple scientific fields, second, interaction with the society in general and third, the young generation in particular. Finally, a close cooperation with artists is the fourth pillar. We round off our human practice advance by bringing together these four pillars under the roof of a talk evening on our future with synthetic biology, allowing interaction and discussion among them.
+
                 <div class="panel-body">Our project is designed to provide knowledge to a broader spectrum of people by creating a framework for <i>in vivo</i> peptide synthesis by NRPS including a design-tool for customization of the desired peptides. Therefore, we believe that it is of very high priority to inform the public about our project and to receive feedback and personal perceptions from the society. Hence, we build our concept for the interaction with the public upon four pillars: First, interaction and cooperation with <b>experts from multiple scientific fields</b>, second, interaction with the <b>society in general</b> and third, the <b>young generation</b> in particular. Finally, a close <b>cooperation with artists</b> is the fourth pillar. We round off our human practice advance by bringing together these four pillars under the roof of a <b>talk evening</b> on our future with synthetic biology, allowing interaction and discussion among them.
-
 
+
<br /><br />
-
We highly value interaction with scientists or experts of different scientific areas as a crucial point within the work for a project as a student team. Though we may work hours and hours doing in the lab on our specific field of interest, it may be the words of someone who is not at all involved that lead the project to a better outcome. Hence we discussed our project with multiple experts in order to obtain different feedback concerning various aspects of our work. Our reference persons (whom we are very thankful for sparing their time with us) were: Prof. Dr. Rainer Zawatzky, safety representative of the DKFZ for scientific input and safety concerns, Dorothea van Aaken, pedagogue for environmental education and representative of the BUND for safety concerns, the secular humanists Heidelberg for ethical input, the Federal German Armed Forces for safety concerns and finally TBM Edelmetal Recycling (a company in gold recycling) for technical input. </div>
+
As conclusion, we believe that our Human Practice advance is well-established on different levels of interaction, as we searched the dialogue with various groups within the society. Furthermore, we strongly believe that we could open up people’s minds to synthetic biology and that we were able to clarify several misunderstanding or misconceptions. This impression is not only our belief, but was also the major feedback we received during our work for Human Practices. In addition to that, the exchange of impression was also very valuable for us and the advance within our project: Often the truth is as an object on a round table, if seen from one position it may clearly be identified as one contour, but from another point of view, it may be something completely different. Choosing the dialogue with people from different backgrounds would then be similar to moving around the table and to understand the nature of the object at the center at least a little better.
 +
</div>
             </div>
             </div>
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 11:04, 4 October 2013

Human Practice

Talk Evening 24th October 2013, 6pm @ BioQuant, Heidelberg

Experts

Prof. Dr. Rainer Zawatzky

Dorothea van Aaken

ABC Unit of German Armed Forces

TBM Edelmetall Recycling
GeneralPublic

Introductory Talks

Secular Humanists
Young Generation

Essay Competition
Art & Science

Not invented by Nature

Project by Joanna

Our project is designed to provide knowledge to a broader spectrum of people by creating a framework for in vivo peptide synthesis by NRPS including a design-tool for customization of the desired peptides. Therefore, we believe that it is of very high priority to inform the public about our project and to receive feedback and personal perceptions from the society. Hence, we build our concept for the interaction with the public upon four pillars: First, interaction and cooperation with experts from multiple scientific fields, second, interaction with the society in general and third, the young generation in particular. Finally, a close cooperation with artists is the fourth pillar. We round off our human practice advance by bringing together these four pillars under the roof of a talk evening on our future with synthetic biology, allowing interaction and discussion among them.

As conclusion, we believe that our Human Practice advance is well-established on different levels of interaction, as we searched the dialogue with various groups within the society. Furthermore, we strongly believe that we could open up people’s minds to synthetic biology and that we were able to clarify several misunderstanding or misconceptions. This impression is not only our belief, but was also the major feedback we received during our work for Human Practices. In addition to that, the exchange of impression was also very valuable for us and the advance within our project: Often the truth is as an object on a round table, if seen from one position it may clearly be identified as one contour, but from another point of view, it may be something completely different. Choosing the dialogue with people from different backgrounds would then be similar to moving around the table and to understand the nature of the object at the center at least a little better.