Team:Heidelberg/Delftibactin/DelH

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 32: Line 32:
                   <li class="month_tab" id="august"><a href="#" style="width:100px; text-align:center">August</a></li>
                   <li class="month_tab" id="august"><a href="#" style="width:100px; text-align:center">August</a></li>
                   <li class="month_tab" id="september"><a href="#" style="width:100px; text-align:center">September</a></li>
                   <li class="month_tab" id="september"><a href="#" style="width:100px; text-align:center">September</a></li>
-
                   <!--<li class="month_tab" id="october"><a href="#" style="width:100px; text-align:center">October</a></li>-->
+
                   <li class="month_tab" id="october"><a href="#" style="width:100px; text-align:center">October</a></li>
                   <li><a href="#" id="forwards">&raquo;</a></li>
                   <li><a href="#" id="forwards">&raquo;</a></li>
                 </ul>
                 </ul>
Line 256: Line 256:
We obtained the correct <i>E. coli</i> BL21 DE3 strain as well as NEB <i>E. coli</i> turbo cells, which significantly overexpress the lac repressor. We found the lacZ-controlled expression of the latter to be very leaky when compared to <i>E. coli</i> BL21 DE3.
We obtained the correct <i>E. coli</i> BL21 DE3 strain as well as NEB <i>E. coli</i> turbo cells, which significantly overexpress the lac repressor. We found the lacZ-controlled expression of the latter to be very leaky when compared to <i>E. coli</i> BL21 DE3.
Since the Gibson assembly of DelH using the HPLC purified primers also exclusively resulted in mutated clones, we developed two new cloning strategies to avoid expression of DelH. The first strategy uses a weak promoter and ribosomal binding site, the second introduces DelH in a ccdB helper construct. Lastly, we continued working on the mutagenesis approach to eliminate the mutation in clone C5. It was sent for sequencing... </p>
Since the Gibson assembly of DelH using the HPLC purified primers also exclusively resulted in mutated clones, we developed two new cloning strategies to avoid expression of DelH. The first strategy uses a weak promoter and ribosomal binding site, the second introduces DelH in a ccdB helper construct. Lastly, we continued working on the mutagenesis approach to eliminate the mutation in clone C5. It was sent for sequencing... </p>
 +
                                </div>
 +
                              </div>
 +
                            </div>
 +
                            <div class="item october first">
 +
                              <img src="data:image/png;base64,"/>
 +
                              <div class="container">
 +
                                <div class="carousel-caption scrollContent2" data-spy="scroll" data-target="#navbarExample" data-offset="0">
 +
                                  <h1>Week 25</h1>
 +
                                  <p style="font-size:10pt; text-align:justify; position:relative; margin-left:6%;">...</p>
                                 </div>
                                 </div>
                               </div>
                               </div>

Revision as of 22:47, 28 October 2013

Del H. This nasty 18 kb fragment.

Facing the challenge to clone 18 kbp of genomic DNA from D. acidovorans.

Heidelberg ga delf.png
Thanks to